|
|
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Film-Tech web setup
|
|
|
|
|
Gerard S. Cohen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 975
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted 01-30-2002 08:21 PM
Although Film-tech works fine with my Windows ME and MSN, while reading the thread "Opera 6 Kicks A$$" one day there was a series of loud thunderclaps. With each boom a MSN icon disappeared from the frame (skin) on my monitor screen. Then Film -tech and MSN froze. Shutting down I got the message "This program [MSN] has performed an illegal action and will be shut down." Same thing happened with a newer "Opera 6..." thread. Today my email contained a message announcing a reply to the Opera 6 thread, but when I went to delete it, The booming, deleting icons and lockup occured again. This is a pain, since I would like to follow the thread and possibly install Opera 6.0, if the comments of Film-techers are favorable.Has anyone else experienced this? My VShield and Viruscan detect nothing. I've just disabled my PopUpKiller, which is the only program I have that can generate a "boom", (when it detects and kills a popup),but that hasn't worked in many months, even when activated.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Dave Macaulay
Film God

Posts: 2321
From: Toronto, Canada
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 01-30-2002 08:55 PM
I didn't know anyone actually used MSN Explorer!From what I've heard this is a bastardized IE5 that "simplifies" internet use much like the AOL browser. If you don't need the "simplification" you should just get rid of it and use the unabridged IE, Netscape, or O*era (I don't want to blow up your system again so I won't spell it out). Unfortunately it may emulate AOL and be near impossible to remove... O*era has some great features (for example the mouse gesture control is sweet and the tabbed windows layout is addictive) and some annoying peculiarities, but once I got used to it I don't use IE unless unavoidable (Film-Tech.com was unuseable in O*era until recently). I stopped trying Netscape a long time ago, it was slow and unstable - it might be great now but I'm off it in much the same zealous way Brad loves it... Try O*era for free, you get some ads but can decide if you like it. Registering it and thus removing the ads is pretty cheap ($US39). And I agree the auto-refresh is annoying. Can the script be modified so it only refreshes if there is a change to the chatroom list rather than on a timer? At least O*era doesn't "click" when refreshing.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99
|
posted 01-30-2002 09:33 PM
Some of the complaints and suggestions here are possible, but many are not for a variety of reasons. I did not start a thread asking for opinions and troubleshooting yet because quite simply I am not finished. Having a way to see if anyone is in the chat room has always been the #1 request of members. Actually pulling that request off is requiring a lot more than I bargained for when I started hacking things. Things like this take time, and that is something I have not had much to spare of in the last couple of days. It was either shut down the site for awhile until I finished upgrading it, or keep it online and have some glitches. I chose to keep it online.Since the change of the design, quite a few problems have turned up that I have seen but have not even been addressed yet. Some of the members have already reported verified problems with the new design. The idea here is obviously to keep the site accessible by as many browsers and platforms as possible, but there does come a point as to what can be done and how much time I have to spend on trying to make every person's system in the world able to navigate the site. I am by no means finished, but I can tell you that Netscape will always work if you come to the site one day and cannot navigate because I am changing things. I design in Netscape and only once finished do I bother to check other browsers for compatibility. Technical glitch reports are very much welcome, but please do make sure to tell me what operating system you are using, what browser you are using and what kind of internet connection you have. Without that information any such report is useless, so please keep that in mind. If anyone has further ideas for improving the site, please feel free to pass them along. However please understand that it is impossible to please everyone and make everybody's system compatible. In the end I will settle with what I feel is the best compromise. As to the "ticking" noise from the chatroom monitor, that is an Internet Explorer issue. This only occurs once every 60 seconds. The ONLY way to remedy that is to make a correction to YOUR computer, or simply stop using that browser and opt for a better one. It is a simple procedure, but will take some time to put together a quick "how to" page. The chat room monitor will not be removed, so please do not ask. Way too many people requested this, I put way too much effort into making it work, and the chat room has seen an amazing increase in it's use since the implementation of the monitor frame. Most of the time all it takes to get a chat going is for one person to go into the chat room and wait. Usually another member will join in within a few minutes and I've seen the chats run for hours from there as people come and go. If you've never participated in the chat room, do step in, as I believe you will find many of the discussions quite interesting. Also, the chat room monitor should not be slowing down an internet connection any more than someone sending an "Instant Message" or an "ICQ message". The data sent is so minimal that unless the computer is really slow or a dialup connection is absurdy slow, it will not slow anything down. I am sending this post from a 26k AOL dialup and have only seen a split second flash of time that it takes to perform the refresh. If anyone is legitimately seeing a slow down, I need specific information about your setup like I listed above in order to troubleshoot.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002
|
posted 01-30-2002 11:29 PM
The "click" sound in IE can be easily turned off.On Win2K: Start Settings Control Panel Sounds and Multimedia Scroll the list down to "Windows Explorer", then highlight "Start Navigation". In the "Name:" drop-down menu, select (None). Click OK. No more clicking sound. This should also work for other versions of Windows. ------------------ - dave Avoid the meadow...
| IP: Logged
|
|
Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99
|
posted 01-30-2002 11:37 PM
Ken listen carefully as I will now quote the Large man..."Popups are evil! I wholeheartedly agree with him and there will never be popups on the site. You mine as well drop this now because you have stated you dislike the chat room monitor. Fine. But I don't need to hear it a second time, especially right after I state that it will stay. Now go back to the main page and read that yellow text that you never do. There you will find the solution to rid yourself of the chat monitor screen. By the way David, thanks for the instructions. I didn't think it would be difficult, but I didn't think it would've been quite so easy.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Beres
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 606
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 01-31-2002 09:08 AM
Brad and Joe, I love the new set up. I have two wishes to speak of at the moment: The first of which Grodon brought up. Now that I am addicted to Opera, it would be nice to have some space between the menu items on the upper right, and that is a minor thing. The other is that I woould love to see the chat status window reversed, that is white on black, rather than black on white. Is that even possible? I love the design here, and I think that the white window detracts from it a little bit, and that is even more of a minor thing. That being said, you guys, as always, are doing a fantasctic job on the site! keep up the great work!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|