Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » 70mm Print Runs (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
Author Topic: 70mm Print Runs
Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 08-28-2002 06:29 PM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi Paul,

"BATMAN" was indeed in 70mm. I remember this film very much because of the problem that they had with the print when a projectionist 'ruined' a couple of minutes of film at the Waikiki #3 where the picture was playing it only Honolulu engagement in 70mm. They did continue to play the film minus the few minutes but someone who saw the movie a couple of times at another theatre in 35mm noticed the missing footage and made such a big fuss, the Honolulu Advertiser reported it on the front page and not on the entertainment section of our morning newspaper where the story actually belonged. When the news was out, Consolidated (Pacific) promptly replaced the 70mm print with a 35mm and contacted Warners Brothers with a request for a replacement reel for the 70mm print. Warner Brothers hesitated but they did send another reel containing the missing footage. I have not yet seen the movie but if they were not able to get a replacement reel for the 70mm print, I would have been forced to see this film in 35mm and would not have been a 'happy camper'.

-Claude

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 08-28-2002 06:37 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Claude wrote: "I have a couple of feet of 70mm film from "THE JAZZ SINGER" and about a couple of frames from "OUTLAND", "YES GEORGIO" and "SOUTH PACIFIC" and the color on all of them is majenta."

Any 70mm prints made on Kodak print film AFTER the early 1980's should still be looking very good, even if stored at room temperature. Even the acid environment from possible mag-stripe related vinegar syndrome should have less of a detrimental effect on the improved dyes:
http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/motion/about/chrono4.shtml
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/about/chrono3.shtml

"Outland", "Jazz Singer" and "Yes, Georgio" just predate the improved Kodak technology by a year or two.

FWIW, I have photographs of my daughter printed on a non-Kodak paper in the late 1970's that have virtually no cyan dye left, and many Kodak prints of the same age and stored identically that are almost unchanged.

For prints with the older print film dye technology, storing them cool, dry and vented (or sealed with Molecular Sieves) will help slow the fading. As always, proper washing during processing (low residual thiosulfate and correct emulsion pH) is a significant factor in long term dye stability.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 08-28-2002 06:50 PM      Profile for Bill Gabel   Email Bill Gabel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
70MM on Hollywood Blvd.

Then in the 80's

Mann's Chinese Theatres #1 DP70 (2 machines) CP200 (full boat)
#2 DP70 (2 machines) CP200 (full boat)
#3 DP70 (2 machines) CP200 (full boat)
Mann's Hollywood Theatre Simplex 35/70 prototype (1 machine) CP100
Mann's Vogue Theatre DP75 (1 machine) CP100
Mann's Fox Theatre DP75 (1 machine) CP100

Pacific's Cinerama Dome JJ2 (2 machines) CP200 (full boat)
Pacific's Hollywood Pacific #1 JJ (2 machines) CP200
#3 JJ (1 machine) CP200
Pantages Theatre DP70 (4 machines) CP100
Paramount Theatre DP70 (2 machines) CP200
UA Egyptian Theatre #1 DP70 (2 machines) CP200 (D150 screen)


Now in 2002

Mann's Grauman's Chinese #1 DP70 (2 machines)
(do not know if any of the other booths are 70mm equiped in this plex)

Pacific's El Capitan JJ3 (1 machine) DLP also
Pacific's Cinerama Dome FP75 (2 machines)
(do not know if any of the other booths are 70mm equiped in this plex)
Pantages DP70 (4 machines)

Egyptian Theatre main house DP70 (2 machines)no longer D150 equipped

AMC's Hollywood Galaxy Vic 8 (3 machines) 3 houses equipped

Yes, Batman was in 70mm. I saw the prints at Mann's Village and Bruin
and Chinese theatres.


 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 08-28-2002 08:01 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Even out in the far reaches of the Orange County suburbs (El Toro, Irvine, etc.) many neighborhood theaters had 70mm in their largest house. Off the top of my head I can think of:

SoCal's Laguna Hills Mall 3
Edwards El Toro 5 (this might have been a circa-1985 Christie??)
Edwards University
Edwards Town Center (2 of 4 screens with 70mm)
Edwards South Coast Plaza
Mann Rancho Niguel (not positive on that name)

There were probably others I'm forgetting. The booth for the El Toro 5's 70mm house had a large window the public could look through, right in front of the platters & projector. You could see everything. I was fascinated by the sight of a 70mm print running! (Who wouldn't be??!! ) The hand-lettered masking tape strip on the tail said "STAR TREK IV - SCOPE - IN GLORIOUS 70MM 6-TRACK DOLBY". The only other 70mm print they ever showed there was "Cocoon"...

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-28-2002 09:25 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Blade Runner definetly had a 70mm print (that is still available ) in Canada

 |  IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 08-28-2002 10:16 PM      Profile for Darryl Spicer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
>>Was "Batman" ever released in 70mm , as it was advertised in Auckland as 70mm but when I went to see it , it was masked Wide Screen and not in scope , this was a 7omm theatre "Regent" but it did not look 70mm to me , not in flat<<

Batman was photographed 1.85. A lot of the blowups to 70mm that were 1.85 did not fill the entire 70mm frame. So you had black area going down the frames. Theaters were told not to pull in there masking for these presentations.


 |  IP: Logged

Mike Schindler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1039
From: Oak Park, IL, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 08-28-2002 10:21 PM      Profile for Mike Schindler   Email Mike Schindler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"Theaters were told not to pull in there masking for these presentations."

Why not?

Also, I'm curious about the 6-track sound formats. Am I right in thinking that the first film to have 3 front channels and 2 surrounds is APOCALYPSE NOW? If so, was that the point at which this configuration became more common than 5 front channels and 1 surround, or did this happen later? Also, is there any way of easily finding out which movies were in which format (maybe a website or something)?


 |  IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 08-28-2002 10:25 PM      Profile for Darryl Spicer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
They felt that it would interfer with the sound reproduction in the left and right channels. At least thats what the letters always said.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 08-28-2002 10:42 PM      Profile for Paul Linfesty   Email Paul Linfesty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Then in the 80's

Mann's Chinese Theatres #1 DP70 (2 machines) CP200 (full boat)
#2 DP70 (2 machines) CP200 (full boat)
#3 DP70 (2 machines) CP200 (full boat)
Mann's Hollywood Theatre Simplex 35/70 prototype (1 machine) CP100
Mann's Vogue Theatre DP75 (1 machine) CP100
Mann's Fox Theatre DP75 (1 machine) CP100


In the early 80's, at least, the Hollywood, Vogue and Fox were all using changeovers with two projectors each, even for 70mm shows. Actually, I never saw any platter projection at any of these theatres, although I think the last time I was in one of Mann's smaller houses in Hollywood was 1984 (the Vogue).

The last time I was at the Chinese I (Harry Potter) i could only see one projector in the new upstairs booth.

If the Vogue had a DP 75, I wonder what happened to the original 70mm projectors they installed in 1959 for the LA debut of The Big Fisherman and also used for Born Free? Wasnt the DP 75 only introduced in the late 60's?


 |  IP: Logged

Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 08-28-2002 11:00 PM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, "BLADRUNNER" was exhibited in 70mm in the United States because I saw it at the Coronet Theatre in San Francisco when it was first released.

-Claude

 |  IP: Logged

Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 08-28-2002 11:56 PM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mike,

The first movie to use split surrounds the way digital sound films are mixed today was on the 70mm prints of "SUPERMAN" released in 1978. It was used again the following year in 1979 with "APOCALYPSE NOW" in the 70mm version.

-Claude


 |  IP: Logged

Paul Cassidy
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 549
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Registered: Aug 2001


 - posted 08-29-2002 01:11 AM      Profile for Paul Cassidy   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Cassidy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I thing I remember about 70mm was that when ever a 70mm film was advertised was that they were very popular , Last one being "Ben Hur" and "2001 a Space ....." the only thing that the public here missed out on was that these cinemas were not real 70mm cinemas , they used a normal 35mm screens although at the Mid City complex this was a HUGE screen , but when showing in 70mm you could see it was cropped to fit the screen and the lamp houses did not seem to be adjusted to suit the larger aperture , all the true 70mm had turned to dust by the time people became interested in Large screen format again , we had 3 true 70mm in Auckland , the "Plaza" DP70 and first Todd AO "Oklahoma" "Sound of Music" "Ryans Daughter" , the "Cinerama" although I was too late to see a 3 panel ,my first Cinerama being "The Greatest Story Ever Told" ,"Those Magnificent Men in There.....Machines" "It's a Mad Mad........" "Star Wars" and the "Embassy" with "West Side Story" ..... so for me I would like to see a true 70mm return to our city , Wellington still has a true 70mm in the "Embassy" where "lord of the Rings " Premiered in 35mm , I even used to go to the "Cinerama" to see 35mm films just to see that Huge screen masked down and there were some good 35mm shown there "kelly's Hero's" "Deliverance" "Solent Green" but I was sad to see the Curved Screen go (they said that Licence problems prevented them from using the Cinerama Lenses and Screen) I later learned that the distortion when showing 35mm was the reason but I never noticed any problems when viewing in this way ????

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 08-29-2002 01:45 AM      Profile for Michael Coate   Email Michael Coate   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
There's some interesting 70mm-related information included in the book FUTURE NOIR: THE MAKING OF BLADE RUNNER by Paul M. Sammon (Harper/1996), including an implication by the film's producer that no U.S. cities ever actually screened the film in 70mm!

Paul Linfesty wrote in response to the above quote:

quote:
The implication is wrong.

I agree. This example in the Blade Runner book illustrates just how unreliable memory can be. I mentioned it to see what type of discussion could be generated.

I found Future Noir: The Making Of Blade Runner to be an outstanding book and a must-read for any Blade Runner fan. However, like any massive research project, the final product is not free of errors. Based on the nature of how information is compiled, however, the errors can't (or shouldn't) always be attributed to the author.

One humorous subjective goof in the book (again attributed to someone's memory) that I can't resist not mentioning is an item explaining how the release date of Blade Runner was selected (June 25, 1982). Alan Ladd, it is explained, selected that date based on the good luck he felt that same date brought him with the openings of Star Wars and Alien while he was at 20th Century Fox prior to forming The Ladd Co. Well, he remembered the "25" part correctly. Alien and Star Wars were both released on the 25th of *May* in their respective years of original release!

As to whether any 70mm prints of Blade Runner actually made it to some theaters, well, we've seen a couple recollections in this thread suggesting they did. As far as newspaper advertisements go, I have notations from searches or photocopied ads with 70mm engagement notations for the following cities:

Los Angeles:
Westwood (Bruin)
Hollywood (Hollywood)
Pasadena (Hastings)

Seattle (theater ?)
San Francisco (Coronet)
Chicago (Esquire)
New York (theater ?)

VARIETY mentioned ten prints being released for Blade Runner. I listed above locations of seven (assuming the ads were correct). Gordon mentioned Toronto a few posts back; that would make eight (assuming he was referring to an original engagement and not a move-over or special screening).

A 70 also seems to have played in London, but I don't know if that print was among the ten mentioned in VARIETY.


 |  IP: Logged

Thomas Hauerslev
Master Film Handler

Posts: 451
From: Copenhagen, Denmark
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 08-29-2002 03:46 AM      Profile for Thomas Hauerslev   Author's Homepage   Email Thomas Hauerslev   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The usual amount of lists: 70mm cinema cinemas in Southern Calif and films in London, LA, Sydney, blow ups and all 65mm films.

------------------

Cheers, Thomas
www.in70mm.com
www.dp70.com
www.70mm.dk


 |  IP: Logged

Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 08-29-2002 09:43 AM      Profile for Paul Linfesty   Email Paul Linfesty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Concerning Blade Runner, I should also mention that a NY Times article on plattered projection that ran in the summer of 1982 highlighted the Criterion's new automated system in use with Blade Runner. According to the article, the platter hadn't been properly weighted for the 70mm print used for it (the first time a 70 feature had been used on the new equipment) causing it to shut down several times during opening weekend.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.