|
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Oscar 2004 -- Complete Reporting "As It Happened"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Hauberg
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 883
From: Malling, Denmark
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 03-01-2004 08:07 PM
"Worth the time, allthough a little bit boring."
I had to choose between local danish transmission or a german one, -both live (minus those 5 sec's). As Denmark has a long tradition for ruining the Oscar Galla with studio hosts, unable to shut up for a sec, resulting in noone understand neither the original spoken language or the "translation", i preferred the greman "Pro-7", whicht turned up to be a very nice partner for the nite: Not one word, while the grown-ups vere speaking. Just a very nice studiohost, using some af Your commercial time on comments. This also left room enough to present the "Seabisquit" teaser in every single break. -You saw the teater: Now watch the movie "
Plusses: Hepburn, Edwards - and Adrian Brody: I have only seen this really fine actor in Polanski's The Pianist, where he really deserved that 2003-award - but in no way excactly showing stuff for an upcoming comedian. I was so very happy, they gave the honourary Oscar to Blake Edwards. Mr Edwards may not be the hell of a speaker, but so much better for writing scenes to make us all drop down in laughter. His entrance was his trademark - and thanks for that. May his films live among us forever ! (-For Mr Laurel and Mr Hardy" -remember..?)
Crystal on autopilot ?? No way. Opening montage as well as musical presentation of the "big ones" were just great !
As someone allready mentioned: Sandra Bullock entered stage just after the "make-up award" has been handed over: What exploded in her face before getting on ???
After so many plusses, one could easy let the few minusse go, but with Crystals big numbers being almost the only entertainment, the result was a bit boring - and that is dangerous, when end of programme was about 06,40 local danish time... -and then, overall: I had a good time with plenty to watch - and the greatest surroundings, You could ask for. That Kodak place is just a beauty !
Per
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002
|
posted 03-02-2004 04:14 PM
While many consider the Super Bowl the prime event on television every year, I have always looked forward to the Academy Awards and enjoyed the show every year. Yes, they do go on and on but I have come to expect that from Oscar shows and this year was no different. Billy Crystall was a great MC as usual and I thought the show this year was excellent and although I was never able to follow the plot of "THE LORD OF THE RING" trilogy, I was rooting for it to win all of it's major awards but the film went on to win in every category it was nominated. Right now it is tied with "BEN-HUR" and "TITANIC" with eleven but the two other films were nominated for additional awards. BEN-HUR received twelve nominations and if it was not for the problem with Karl Tunberg's original screenplay, the film would be unbeaten with 12 Oscars. Karl Tunberg did get sole credit for the screen play and was nominated but most of the credit for the excellent film writing belonged to Gore Vidal, Maxwell Anderson and Christopher Fry. Had they been credited instead of Tunberg, "BEN-HUR" would have won all of it's awards like "TLOTR/ROTK" did the other evening.
As far as predicting the awards, I correctly picked 20 out of twenty four. I missed on cinematography (I picked "GIRL WITH PEARL EARRING"). Although I did not see "MASTER AND COMMANDER", "TGWPE", a film about Dutch painter Johannes Vermeer had gorgeous photography! I picked "PIRATES OF THE CARRIBBEAN" over "MASTER AND COMMANDER" for best sound editing because I thought the the "PIRATES" soundtrack was awesome. The other two were for animated Short Film and live action short film and not having seen any of the nominated movies, it was purely guess work and I was wrong.
-Claude
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|