Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Get out and VOTE tomorrow!! (Page 7)

 
This topic comprises 8 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8 
 
Author Topic: Get out and VOTE tomorrow!!
Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene

Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 11-03-2004 04:54 PM      Profile for Dave Williams   Author's Homepage   Email Dave Williams   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jeremy, it's time like these I realize I should not have quit bieng a teacher. Of course I was teaching five year old deaf kids with down's syndrome, but still I WAS MAKING A DIFFERENCE DAMMIT!!!

oh back to business... on the electoral college, I thought long and hard to today about it all and came up with a few examples that I hope at least try to help out a bit with understanding it's importance...

quote: Jeremy Fuentes
Yes, but were not voting on something on the state level, we are voting on a national level. It shouldnt matter what state I live in at all. I live in this country, and the winner represents this country, not just the interests of my state or any other state. The country as a whole, so the votes should be counted as a whole.
The winner of the presidency is quite often seen as the primary figurehead, however he has very limited powers. In all actuality, he represents the states of the republic, not the members of those states.

When you vote for president, you are only voting for electors who will then cast a vote for president. It may seem like you are voting in a national election, however a national election is exactly what the framers of our government hoped to avoid.

In all reality, you never vote in a national election. You vote for matters of locality, state, and thats it. When it comes to every four years, your state is asking you to tell it how you want it to be represented at the national level.

The only requirement for states to cast electoral votes is that they be cast in washington, in person by electoral members chosen by states to vote, on a specific day. I cannot recall the day, it is in january however.

If we were to ever do away with the electoral college and just vote the majority vote for president, it would completely strip this country of the one thing that has given it such longevity.... a "republic" of "free democratic" states. To switch to an actual national election for the first time in our nations history (since the inception of our current constitution), would deprive each state of its free will to determine how it votes for the leader of the republic. This would easily lead to outward determination of states policies regarding its affairs, and the elimination of states rights, state borders, self determination of local goverments, and eventually, yes, even the elimination of individual rigts of freedom.

Take also note that your congressmen vote on hundreds of bills each year, and you trust that they are going to do the best in your interest. You don't get to vote on these bills, you send someone to do it for you. The same is for the president. You dont vote for the president... ever. You vote for someone that holds your interests dear and hope that is the person that will cast the vote the way you wish them too.

So when you think you are voting for a president, you are really voting for some person you have never met, who will then take the state vote to washington to cast it for your state. YOu never actually vote for president. You vote for the vote for president.

Ok my head hurts. I am going to bed.

CIao

Dave

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-03-2004 06:43 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I thought it was pretty interesting when several news people said that although there were millions of new young voters this year, encouraged to register by MTV, Rolling Stone and the "Vote For Change" concert tour, the youngsters did not vote in any greater numbers than in previous years.

One guy on CNN said, "Apparently these young people are more than willing to go out and see Bruce Springsteen and register to vote while at the concert, but when it comes to actually going to the polls, they can't be bothered."

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Fuentes
Mmmm, Dr. Pepper!

Posts: 1168
From: Corpus Christi, TX United States
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 11-03-2004 08:32 PM      Profile for Jeremy Fuentes   Email Jeremy Fuentes   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Dave Williams
Ok my head hurts.
Thanks for the headache inducing explanation. I dont have a headache, but I appreciate the effort you put into the explanation for me, saving me from a headache. But seriously, I was expecting a detailed explanation from you that made it clear for me how the whole thing works, and thats what I got. Thanks.

quote: Dave Williams
Jeremy, it's time like these I realize I should not have quit bieng a teacher.
Its times like these I wish I would have stayed awake in class.

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Hill
I love my cootie bug

Posts: 7595
From: Hollywood, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 11-03-2004 08:37 PM      Profile for Phil Hill   Email Phil Hill       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
quote: Dave Williams
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeremy, it's time like these I realize I should not have quit bieng a teacher.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Its times like these I wish I would have stayed awake in class.

It's time like these I wish a "teacher" would instruct our youngin's how to spell correctly.

>>> Phil

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Hipp
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1462
From: Mesquite, Tx (east of Dallas)
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 11-03-2004 11:30 PM      Profile for Chris Hipp   Email Chris Hipp   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mike Blakesley
I thought it was pretty interesting when several news people said that although there were millions of new young voters this year, encouraged to register by MTV, Rolling Stone and the "Vote For Change" concert tour, the youngsters did not vote in any greater numbers than in previous years.

I was thinking the same thing when Puff diddy faddy combs was on NBC bragging about everything he did, but he didn't really do anything except get people registered and then not vote. I'm not saying his efforts were pointless, but don't boast about something that didnt really happen.

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 11-04-2004 01:00 AM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
Wouldn't you think that many of the 18-29 year olds that voted four years ago have moved on to the 30-44 group, since they're all four years older?

Fresh faces were needed to replace them so that the 18-29 group stayed at the same level as the last election, while the 30-44 and 44-59 groups both grew slightly.

 |  IP: Logged

Rachel Craven
Madam Moderator

Posts: 2190
From: Pensacola, FL
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 11-04-2004 07:51 AM      Profile for Rachel Craven   Email Rachel Craven   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Adam Martin
Wouldn't you think that many of the 18-29 year olds that voted four years ago have moved on to the 30-44 group, since they're all four years older?

Hey, I'm in that group now, and I still will be in 4 years when the next presidential race comes up.

 |  IP: Logged

John T. Hendrickson, Jr
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 889
From: Freehold, NJ, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 11-04-2004 06:30 PM      Profile for John T. Hendrickson, Jr   Email John T. Hendrickson, Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dave Williams said:

"The only requirement for states to cast electoral votes is that they be cast in washington, in person by electoral members chosen by states to vote, on a specific day. I cannot recall the day, it is in january however."

Not so. The electors meet in the capital of each state on the second Tuesday of December after the general election. A "slate" of electors submitted by the winning party of each state are the ones who cast ballots for President and Vice President. They will most likely vote for the candidates of their party, but by law are not required to do so. Those ballots are then sealed and transmitted to the Congress in Washington. In January, the President of the Senate (the current Vice President) counts the ballots and announces the official result.

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 11-07-2004 01:17 PM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The voting age should be raised to 30. Less frustration for all concerned. [Razz]

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 11-07-2004 02:14 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
Sure. And let's revoke the rights of women and minorities while we're at it. Obviously, only white men over 30 are able to think for themselves.

People over 50 shouldn't be able to vote (or drive). Why should they care? They're almost dead anyway. [Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene

Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 11-07-2004 03:22 PM      Profile for Dave Williams   Author's Homepage   Email Dave Williams   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: John T. Hendrickson, Jr
The electors meet in the capital of each state on the second Tuesday of December after the general election. A "slate" of electors submitted by the winning party of each state are the ones who cast ballots for President and Vice President. They will most likely vote for the candidates of their party, but by law are not required to do so. Those ballots are then sealed and transmitted to the Congress in Washington. In January, the President of the Senate (the current Vice President) counts the ballots and announces the official result.

You are partially correct, and partially incorrect.

At current here is how it plays out...

United States Code, Title 3, Chapter 1, Section 7: The electors of President and Vice President of each State shall meet and give their votes on the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December next following their appointment at such place in each State as the legislature of such State shall direct.

This would put it this year on December 13. Where I erred is that the counting of the votes is on January 6th, as I originally stated that the electors meet in washington in january to place thier votes. They do in fact meet in each state, at a place determined by each state, at the date described in federal election law. There six copies of votes and certifications are each originated and sent out to their respective recipients. This is done to prevent the circumventing of votes by outside parties.

Also, while there is no constitutional provision for electors to cast votes according to thier state tally, there are 26 states that have either state law or party requirements to cast the ballots as per the state tally. The federal cannot intervene in the state affair on this matter, so they must discard or take under advisement and council any votes not in proportion to thier state tally if thier state law so demands it.

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 11-07-2004 04:44 PM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Adam Martin
Obviously, only white men over 30 are able to think for themselves.
A little bigotted today, are we, Adam? This is typical. You make a statement, and the people who claim to know better read all sorts of meaning into it that isn't there.

Please spare me the righteousness act.

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 11-07-2004 04:57 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
Then what the  - did you mean?

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-07-2004 07:21 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well obviously the words "white" and "men" didn't appear in his original post.

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 11-07-2004 07:36 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
Here's what my post meant: If Tim wants to discriminate against people under 30 (who, by the way, are eligible to be elected as Congressmen), then we might as well discriminate against the elderly, women, minorities, and anyone else who might have differing opinions or values.

I read Tim's post to suggest that voters under 30 raise questions and issues that he feels "frustrates" the process and that these issues should not be addressed or should be swept under the carpet and we should all play like they don't exist. AKA, "Those damned whippersnappers! Always causing trouble!"

I'm still waiting to find out what exactly he meant if it was indeed something that I read into incorrectly.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 8 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.