|
|
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Your Favourite Projector and Booth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999
|
posted 08-18-2006 11:31 AM
You're absolutely right, Darryl, as usual. You have a good memory, guy. Subsequent to Mid-States taking over the theatres there (and the drive-ins really went downhill quickly after that), they kept the #2 Century head at the Circle 25, and put it on a forward-only Sword system, along with an Eprad soundhead (yeeeuck!) and Kneisley Xenex I 4k lamp.
Except for a BX-100, they installed the same setup across the street at the Family D/I.
After my 1974-75 excursions in the carbon arc days, I came back and ran these "updated" booths in the '78-'79 seasons. Even in that short time span, the theatres were but a shadow of what they were just 3 seasons prior.
Re: Sky-Vue... you're right. It was a 3k Kneisley conversion, and I'd tried my best to talk them out of doing that doghouse deal, but that's what Chakeres did in all their drive-ins. I came back to that theatre (I'd operated there in '75-'76 and in '78, I believe) to manage/operate in '89 on the "new" system (before periscope/2nd screen)... I used the carbon machine for cartoons and clocks. Yes, sir!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004
|
posted 08-20-2006 02:38 PM
Now,, since we're talking about favorite machine and booths, I have to deterr this topic a bit to some specifics of certain machines ... and that is the shutters.
Okey, we've seen the three known versions - Barrel shutters, single and the double shutters. Both the barrel and the double shutters uses the dissolving methods, whereas the single just does the cutting.
Granted, is it due to simple mechanics why the barrel shutter (still used in some of the European units, and was dearly used by Motiographs, which were excellent machines for a good number of years) was discontiuned, in as much as the double shutter with the complex transmission could have been the reason for manufacturing, but were any of these shutters better than others, or just was it other factors to use a simple shutter ...
or, you could say, that I'm asking "which was was the best, or was it a "six-of-one", "half-dozen-of-another" sort of thing?
thx-Monte
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 13 pages: 1 2 3 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|