Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Volume Levels, is level 7 too high? (Page 4)

 
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
Author Topic: Volume Levels, is level 7 too high?
Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-03-2002 08:56 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually they very much apply as it is garbage in = garbage out
And that is one of many films that the this was true for another was Mummy2 Twister Fast and Furious all stayed over the 80% modulation point for extended peroids

 |  IP: Logged

Tom Fermanian
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 101
From: Sainte Adele, Quebec, Canada
Registered: Dec 2001


 - posted 02-03-2002 08:58 PM      Profile for Tom Fermanian   Email Tom Fermanian   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Re on't touch that Dial
I never said that this was smart, this is just a reality check, what you say that none of higher echelon are in their theatres, you're right, and yeah they do get complaints and do give out refunds for many different things .On Vacation once, I was in a first run theatre (circuit owned) watching a picture,Friday night first showing, film went "misframed" between trailers and feature. I went out and mentioned this to an attendant,4- 5 minutes later no change!!, I go back complain again offering to adjust it for them, They say sorry! no one allowed in the booth except employees! What happened next!, They Stop the show and refund everyone Wow!

------------------

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Turner
Film Handler

Posts: 87
From: Chula Vista, CA, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 02-03-2002 09:03 PM      Profile for Tim Turner   Email Tim Turner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 

I can imagine exactly what happened there! The projectionist probably went home for the night, and noone knew how to adust the frame!

 |  IP: Logged

Ray Derrick
Master Film Handler

Posts: 310
From: Sydney, Australia
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 02-05-2002 01:53 AM      Profile for Ray Derrick   Email Ray Derrick   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad, I am not so sure your eq vs loudness theory is valid. Consider for example an eq which is set say 3dB too high (above flat) at the high and low ends, but is 3dB deficient (below flat) in the midrange, say between 800Hz and 5kHz. It could still read the same total SPL of 85dBC as the flat response, but would sound a bit soft, because human hearing is most sensitive around 3kHz, falling off either side of that. So bad eq will not necessarily mean "sounds louder", it could equally result in "sounds softer". Just a little food for thought here.

------------------
Ray Derrick
President/Chief Engineer
Panalogic Corporation Sydney, Australia
Phone: 61 (0)2 9894 6655 Fax: 61 (0)2 9894 6935

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-05-2002 02:20 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A bad EQ sounds "harsher" and people associate "harsher" with "louder" and ask the projectionist to turn it down because it hurts their ears.


 |  IP: Logged

Oscar Neundorfer
Master Film Handler

Posts: 275
From: Senoia, GA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 02-05-2002 06:47 AM      Profile for Oscar Neundorfer   Author's Homepage   Email Oscar Neundorfer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I suppose it depends on the definition of "harsher". Bad EQ does not necessarily mean harsher, at least according to my definition, although certain poor EQ practices can certainly result in "harsher" sound. My thinking is that peaks in response in the 1kHz to 3kHz range will most likely be perceived as harsh.

Also high frequency horn speakers tend to be a bit hard sounding at best, and it does not take too much peaking in the response at just the right frequencies to grossly accentuate that. They can take on a real "in-your-face" type of sound that I, and I am sure others, find objectionable.

Regardless of the reason, if people are consistently asking the projectionist to turn it down, then it IS too loud no matter what the fader is set to, and no matter what the artistic aspirations of the producer/director/mixer might be. Personally, as a paying customer(which is what I usually am), if it is hurting my ears, then I don't really give a flying damn why, I just want the volume lowered to a reasonable level so I can enjoy the movie I paid to see and hear! As a technical person, I am certainly interested in the reasons for the sound problems, and I would want to do whatever I could to help the theater correct the problems. But when I have paid my money, I do not expect to have my ears hurt.

Just to give some perspective, when we were in a different location, we had a very nice screening room. The sound system was tuned beautifully, and I could achieve over 120dB spl in that room. I could play films with levels approaching and occasionally exceeding that level. I could listen there at high levels easily and my ears did not complain. So I do not necessarily mind high spl as long as it does not hurt. (I do understand that excessive levels at long term exposure can cause hearing damage. I am not talking about that kind of hurt).

The bottom line is that IF the theater acoustics are good, and IF the system tuning is done properly, and IF the amplifiers are capable of providing sufficient power, and IF the film is mixed well, and IF the film audio content is not horrible sounding, THEN you may be able to run the film at reference level with no problems or complaints. Unfortunately many theaters and many films simply do not allow this happy set of events to occur.

And ultimately, what is more important - having the fader set to 7 or having customers who want to give you their money because they like the presentations at your theater?

------------------
Oscar Neundorfer
Chief Engineer
SMART Devices, Inc.

oscar@smartdev.com

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-05-2002 06:51 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Ray, your math is certainly valid, but I find the biggest problem is people who EQ to the magic curve and then walk away from the job, insisting that is the best it can ever get. Low end is rarely the problem (unless the bonehead tech rolls it off because "that's the subwoofer's job", which in turn is like turning up the midrange and high frequencies). In my experience, the problem with customer complaints always comes from the upper midrange frequencies. (Typically from 3-8Khz where sibilance is most prevalent.) Room volume and acoustics will ultimately dictate how steep or shallow that rolloff needs to be. Although generally a very minor change is necessary, I've never heard a good sounding auditorium where listening and ultimately trusting one's ears was not part of the process. An RTA is a tool, not a magic box for a tech to cheat his way to achieving the best possible sound. Surely you agree with those points.

Also Joe really does have the bottom line here. If the customers think it sounds great and continue to patronize that theater because of the "great sound", who really cares? Honestly now, we're in this to get people out of their homes, away from the DVD and to make money. I'm not agreeing with your fictional example that an EQ should be deficient between 800hz and 5Khz, but if that particular example of yours happens to sound fantastic in a particular auditorium and the customers are happy, it really does not matter how the end result was achieved. Some auditoriums have such a horrible echo or poor surround speaker type and placement that the surrounds must be played lower than reference. Is that wrong to turn them down? Of course not, and most every tech will agree. On the other hand, some auditoriums can really benefit from having the surrounds 1/2 to 1db louder, but in that instance you will see techs losing their mind. This is just foolish. What sounds right to the customers in a particular auditorium repeatedly film after film after film is what counts and continues to sell those tickets. (I clarify this because if only one film sounds good, then the EQ is no good.)

Also I think directors and sound mixers would rather have a room that did not look razor perfect on the RTA, received no customer complaints ...only praise and was played at (or very close to) reference 85db levels than an auditorium which is a perfect picture of the instructional manual that has to be played several db lower, losing it's impact in order to keep customer complaints down. That's not the way for us to make customers want to run out to their local cinema instead of waiting for the DVD release. That's just people being hard headed and stubborn.


 |  IP: Logged

Oscar Neundorfer
Master Film Handler

Posts: 275
From: Senoia, GA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 02-05-2002 07:08 AM      Profile for Oscar Neundorfer   Author's Homepage   Email Oscar Neundorfer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad said this:"...but I find the biggest problem is people who EQ to the magic curve and then walk away from the job, insisting that is the best it can ever get."

He is SO right.

My experience has been that at almost every THX house I have been in, it sound like this is exactly what has happened. The tuning was done, the gear was packed up, and the technician went home. No listening. No fine tuning to pick up what the instruments can't. No subjectivism at all. I am an engineer, and I tend to like objective measurements. But I have also learned that ultimately, you stow the test equipment that plugs in, and use the test equipment that comes attached to the sides of your head. It DOES NOT MATTER what the rta says if it still sounds bad.

------------------
Oscar Neundorfer
Chief Engineer
SMART Devices, Inc.

oscar@smartdev.com

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Macaulay
Film God

Posts: 2321
From: Toronto, Canada
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 02-05-2002 07:59 AM      Profile for Dave Macaulay   Email Dave Macaulay   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Supposedly there is a standard now for trailer level, that the trailer sound level can't be louder than the actual film sound level... Are producers just increasing the film level to get their trailer level higher?
I've been in films where the ridiculously loud sound at 7 can't be just an EQ problem. And the trailers were excrutiating.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-05-2002 08:29 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
You probably were in an auditorium with a poor EQ, crappy speakers, poor speaker placement and aiming, no baffle wall, poor acoustics and so forth.

The trailer standards thing is a joke. I've only seen a decrease of about 2db. That's nowhere near enough.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 02-05-2002 10:46 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here are some links to information about the trailer loudness and the TASA standard:
http://www.boxoff.com/issues/feb01/tasa.html
http://www.mpaa.org/jack/2001/2001_05_09.htm
http://www.dolby.com/press/meter.html
http://www.dolby.com/press/wb.pr.0101.AMPAS.html
http://www.usatoday.com/life/health/doctor/lhdoc200.htm
http://www.hps4000.com/pages/general/sound_levels.pdf
http://media-services.com/newsletters/ABjun01.htm#story6
http://www.editorsguild.com/newsletter/SepOct01/ioan_allen_one.html
http://www.editorsguild.com/newsletter/NovDec01/ioan_allen_two.html
http://www.thx.com/professional_services/guidelines.pdf


------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

David Favel
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 764
From: Ashburton, New Zealand
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 02-05-2002 04:49 PM      Profile for David Favel   Email David Favel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I SET MY LEVELS ACCORDING TO MY AUDIENCE.
A ROOM FULL OF GRANNIES WILL BE PLAYED AT "5.5" HOWEVER AT MY LATE & LOUD SESSIONS "8" IS THE NORM.
A FULL AUDITORIUM FOR ME WILL ALWAYS BE CRANKED UP HALF A NOTCH.

HOWEVER 5 MINUTES IN THE AUDITORIUM WILL GIVE ME A GOOD INDICATION OF THE CORRECT LEVEL.

I HAVE TRAINED MY USHERS TO BE AWARE OF SOUND & PICTURE PROBLEMS & REPORT DIRECTLY TO THE BOX ANY CONCERNS.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Aston
Film Handler

Posts: 54
From: Albrighton, Shropshire, UK
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 02-05-2002 06:20 PM      Profile for Frank Aston   Email Frank Aston   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think we're finally getting a concensus which indicates that sound, which is too loud/harsh/distorted/injurous etc, is bad for business.

Now we have to get away from the stereotypical view that older audiences like it quiet. The simple fact is that mature cinemagoers, like all genuine movie enthusiasts, prefer the sound to be appropiate to the image.

Too often, levels are set by projectionists who are only interested in the latest 'popcorn' movie. There's a noticable reluctance to print-check films like The Others, Gosford Park or A Beautiful Mind yet a positive clamour for Monsters Inc and Black Hawk Down.

Cheers,

Frank.


 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-05-2002 06:47 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
David F.,

Welcome to the Forums, but there's no need to SHOUT!

(Pretty ironic, in this thread about sound volume)

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Macaulay
Film God

Posts: 2321
From: Toronto, Canada
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 02-05-2002 07:40 PM      Profile for Dave Macaulay   Email Dave Macaulay   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad, I don't think the auditorium setup and EQ is always responsible.
I've set up reasonable size rooms with decent acoustic treatment, adequate amps, modern correctly sized screen and surround speakers (either JBL or EAW), with no frame rattles. Setup is with the recommended SPL on all channels, RTA using an R2 and multiplexer, with no radical EQ applied.
I don't trust the RTA entirely and I'll do a listening test to check for any oddities or harshness.
With the fader at 7 some soundtracks are just too frigging loud. Not distorted or harsh, loud.
At 7 there are some trailers that are really painful. I can't recall the film but the trailer had some opera stuff, a soprano singing something dramatic. I was not the only one covering my ears!
Setting 7 on the fader is supposed to give us the level the director wants us to hear.
I've had personal experience with a director who must be partially deaf, we would set up the opening screenings he came to at his "official" level and deal with any complaints - but no show after he left was as loud.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.