Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Volume Levels, is level 7 too high? (Page 6)

 
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
Author Topic: Volume Levels, is level 7 too high?
Bernard Tonks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 619
From: Cranleigh, Surrey, England
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 02-11-2002 09:57 AM      Profile for Bernard Tonks   Email Bernard Tonks   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The worst film for complaints I had was for that fire fighting disaster epic BACKDRAFT (1991), so many in fact that in desperation we finished up riding the fader each run. Perhaps I should have tried it mono.

There were complaints of being too loud on the first day of SAVING PRIVATE RYAN, so I wound down L & R about 2db. Seemed much better to me and there were no further complaints.

Some will remember the sound problems with GIANT (1954), cue sheets were sent out with every copy in the UK.



 |  IP: Logged

Laurence Hammett
Film Handler

Posts: 16
From: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 02-11-2002 11:07 AM      Profile for Laurence Hammett   Email Laurence Hammett   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Whenever I finish adjusting an auditorium I tell the staff that "7" is:
Friday night with a full house
The Tone Deaf Director and his entourage in a sound stage
Any afternoon with Joe, the field hippy saying "Hey dude, could you turn it up, Grandma isn't here."

Everything else is around 6 and if you turn it down much more than that FOR ONE PERSON, you will ruin it for the rest of your audiences for the rest of the day because you will be down popping the corn and sweeping the theatre rather than coming upstairs to check on the levels again.

Of course I also tell them that this is true on a properly mixed feature and that some independents and non-us features vary widely.

Laurence Hammett
Field Service Technician
Southern California

GO INTO THE AUDITORIUM during the FEATURE and listen yourself. THEN adjust the volume accordingly.

 |  IP: Logged

Tom Fermanian
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 101
From: Sainte Adele, Quebec, Canada
Registered: Dec 2001


 - posted 02-11-2002 11:17 AM      Profile for Tom Fermanian   Email Tom Fermanian   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here's another one: We check in Auditorium, if it sounds right, we assume that it's ok for patrons, If we get complaints, we'll re-check and if it still seems right, we don't touch it,BUT we do tell the the person that complained that we adjusted it and enquire if it's Okay now, 99% of the time, they tell us "yes" it's much better now???? The same can be said for auditorium temperature settings??

------------------

 |  IP: Logged

Tom Sauter
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 163
From: Buffalo, NY, USA
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 02-11-2002 12:15 PM      Profile for Tom Sauter   Author's Homepage   Email Tom Sauter   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Good point, Tom. I have used this trick for a while... when running stage monitors I've had the request for "a little more 1K", looked at the EQ, found it all the way up, just waved my hand over the console, and said, "Is that better?"

Almost every time they say "yes".

 |  IP: Logged

Rory Burke
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 181
From: Burbank, CA, USA
Registered: Jun 2000


 - posted 02-11-2002 04:13 PM      Profile for Rory Burke   Email Rory Burke   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I remember the "Relic" that movie was LOUDDDDDDD!!! In all of my THX houses cept for the bigger auditoriums it would make the amps clip.......I thought to myself.....what is the problem? I took out all my a-chain and b-chain equipment and verified that every thing was properly calibrated 300 mv out of the processor 85db lcr etc etc etc and it was.....the conclusion is that movies differ and my theater no exception THX or no THX auditorium...movies are just varying at the mixing stage too much and i agree with an earlier statement that said something about fader <7.0> just being obsolete and pointless now. Most theaters tune their rooms to the 7.0 standard and that keeps our end of things somewhat standardized but now I feel some of the responsibility falls onto the mixing stage<not nescessarirly the mixer either> but for people that make more of the decisions like directors and producers. I believe Gordon addressed this in an earlier post!

Rory

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-11-2002 04:23 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't remember "The Relic" specifically, but I still find that rarely *in a properly set up auditorium* does the fader need to be altered from movie to movie, nor very far from 7. I feel there IS a fair amount of consistency from mix to mix, but obviously not every film will play at the exact same level.

To further prove my point, you multiplex guys, don't you for the most part find a fader setting for each auditorium (regardless of what it actually is) and find that *most* movies play well at it? I have.

Funny Rory, I've had some people over to my screening room lately and ran action-intensive "loud" movies at 7.5, noticeably over "reference level" and after the show when questioned was told "volume was perfect" or "could've even been turned up just a touch more". Ya gotta trust your ears when you tune those things. If a sound tech cannot obtain fantastic sound without an R2, then that tech isn't very good. That really should be a requirement from Lucasfilm before certifying the tech. IMHO the R2 just makes things easier for a good tech to get great sound. It's just a tool.

Case in point I've walked into a THX auditorium fairly recently that was just tuned by a THX tech and had to lower the fader to 3.25 so my ears wouldn't bleed. Just being in there at "5" for a couple of minutes gave me a splitting headache! After looking at the EQ to see what in the HELL that guy did to it, I saw one slider after another up and down then the next one was up and the next one was down, all the way from one end to another with few exceptions! Now you're telling me that this "THX certified sound tech" did a good job just because it showed up as a perfectly flat line on his R2? Hell no.

You "I tune with an R2 and the fader must play at 5" guys are clearly never doing any listening and fine tuning afterwards with the most important test instrument of all...your ears!


 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-11-2002 04:32 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As always I have a problem with this fine tuning by ear
Since I service many screening room and heard the level in them at "7" then you would know that a theatre playing it a "7" and didn't get complaints then something is wrong
And if the system is "tuned" for it to be at "7" all the time and you get a "properly recorded" track you probably will run out of fader before getting it turned up enough

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-11-2002 04:35 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
So you feel that even though your faders may play at 5 for most films that you need an extra 15db or so of volume on standby? What??? That's insane. I've never had a problem "running out of fader" before and here you are one of the people that are saying that 7 is way too loud.

Perhaps you would be so kind as to list a dozen "properly recorded" tracks of the last 10 years for referencing purposes?


 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-11-2002 05:14 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I remember "The Relic". We played that in our #4 house at UA Greenwood for a couple of weeks. 6.5 was the norm on the fader for movies in that auditorium. I thought the movie sounded very good at that level. Greenwood had no THX but was originally supposed to be before someone with the first name Larry and last name Jacob--- I forget the rest changed things around... adding all curved screens and stuff like that. Some of what he changed around was good while others were bad.

When I have helped open the projection booths at various theaters I have always found that the THX guys have the "WOW" reel that they listen to once after the final EQ. Every time I have seen them do this they only used the SR reel as it didn't have digital encoding on it. I guess the newer reels do.


 |  IP: Logged

Ray Derrick
Master Film Handler

Posts: 310
From: Sydney, Australia
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 02-12-2002 08:45 PM      Profile for Ray Derrick   Email Ray Derrick   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Another point to consider is the expected variation in analyser calibration. How many cinema techs can say absolutely for sure that their analyser SPL calibration is correct? How many forget to (or even don't know to) correctly install the microphone calibration files for each microphone? How many don't always use the correct mic for each channel, so that it matches it's calibration file? Don't laugh, I have seen this basic error more than a few times. I think some of the pros here would be surprised at the lack of knowledge and expertise of the "average" cinema technician, particularly when it comes to sound alignment.

Also there is the questionable practice of using only mic 1 when setting the final SPL. I think this is THX recommended practice and frankly I think it is downright foolish! Checking the individual spectral response for each microphone will usually reveal quite significant deviations from flat, even though the multi-mic averaged response is showing flat. So why set the SPL using a non-flat source and why use a mic which may not represent the true average SPL? Very bad idea, THX!!

------------------
Ray Derrick
President/Chief Engineer
Panalogic Corporation Sydney, Australia
Phone: 61 (0)2 9894 6655 Fax: 61 (0)2 9894 6935


 |  IP: Logged

Scott Christopher
Film Handler

Posts: 69
From: Adelaide, South Australia
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 02-27-2002 09:05 PM      Profile for Scott Christopher   Email Scott Christopher   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I run my faders at about 5.0 during the feature. anything above is usually too loud. I have had many elderly people come out of the cinema and comment on how it was so lovely not to be blasted away. And to back up my argument - Phillip Noyce, director of 'Rabbit Proof Fence' made comment to me and on Radio, "See this film in Digital. The best place in Adelaide in Cinema Nova" - He also told me that it was a bit loud - Not Bad, Fader set to 5.0 - EQ setting must be good.

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 02-27-2002 09:32 PM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've put little P-Touch labels on all the processors saying what their subjective fader level is. Most are 6.5, some actually stay on 7.

I feel if you have to play at 6 or below, then something has gone wrong with the alignment.

------------------
And, hey! Let's be careful out there.

~Manny.


 |  IP: Logged

Ryan Powers
Film Handler

Posts: 27
From: Charlotte, NC, USA
Registered: Nov 2001


 - posted 02-28-2002 12:56 AM      Profile for Ryan Powers   Email Ryan Powers   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I remember "The Relic"! I would put it in my top five loudest movies category. About three quarters of the way through three right side surround sound speaker blew. Other really loud movies I remember would be, Face/Off, Starship Troopers, and The Matrix. I am glad that they were played loud. Could you imagine watching The Matrix at a low volume?

As an audience member, I prefer movies to be loud, especially on action films.. It's part of the movie theater experience isn't it? Also it drowns out the people that enjoy talking during the film. I wonder what the theaters I go to play at, because It's been a long time since I have walked out of a theater thinking the sound was powerful or even close to being loud. Even the big movies this year such as Monsters Inc., Lord of the Rings, and Harry Potter where I saw it in two separate theaters played very low and unimpressive. From what I could tell, I bet they were good sounding movies. That's the frustrating part. I guess I am just spoiled from the theater I used to go to before I moved because the sound was always loud and thunderous, and that included the auditoriums that were not THX certified. I find myself going to the theater a lot less now because I know not to expect much from the sound.

My personal opinion is it is better to be on the loud side then not. It is terrible to go to a movie and have hard time hearing what the actors are saying. Good comedies are a good example. Several movies such as "There's Something About Mary" and "The Nutty Professor 2" the laughter was louder then the film. All you could do was lip read in parts.

I don't like getting up once the movie has started, unless there is a major problem. Even then, most people will just wait for someone like me to get up after a while and inform someone of the problem. I did get up and ask for the volume to be turned up on Harry Potter but wasn't surprised when I couldn't tell any difference later on. I haven't gone back and probably won't.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Aston
Film Handler

Posts: 54
From: Albrighton, Shropshire, UK
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 02-28-2002 01:28 AM      Profile for Frank Aston   Email Frank Aston   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well Tim T. You certainly started something with this topic.

There's one common misconception throughout many of the posts particularly among those who regard "The Matrix" as a new religion.

It's that mature technicians are somehow, not qualified to judge correct volume levels.

Correctly calibrated volume, when appropiate, CAN enhance the overall movie experience but, in inexperienced hands it can also ruin it. The matter shouldn't be entirely subjective. The conciencious technician will consider (a) The intentions of the film-makers and (b) The expectations of the audience. The least important aspect is what the technician likes.

For the record, I've never forgotten the thrill, as an audience member, of Roadshow presentation when the curtains (traveller?) would close following the flat/mono ads/short and trailers, there would be a minute or so of silence. And then the thunderous opening chords of the Overture in multi-channel stereo.

Seems off-topic I know, but many technicians who advocate overplaying today have sadly, never experienced this wonder.

It's ALWAYS better on the big screen.

Kind regards,

Frank.

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Turner
Film Handler

Posts: 87
From: Chula Vista, CA, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 02-28-2002 01:53 AM      Profile for Tim Turner   Email Tim Turner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah this thread gets longer and longer, every day!

Anyway Queen of the Damned is another movie thats way too loud at Level 6, My ears were about to burst! But I can see these producers were just trying to sell the soundtrack.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.