|
|
|
|
Author
|
Topic: D-Cinema...post your pros and cons of the different equipment
|
|
|
Justin Hamaker
Film God

Posts: 2253
From: Lakeport, CA USA
Registered: Jan 2004
|
posted 08-02-2011 01:43 PM
I have been using the NEC NC2000S Series 2 projector for almost a year, along with the GDC server and MasterImage 3D.
For the most part I've found the NEC projector to be stable and have had no major problems. We do have the occasional freeze where a trailer seems to get "stuck" during playback and the projector has to be rebooted - but this has been less of an issue since installing the 3.0 updates.
The DCC software for the NEC projector is not very intuitive, but I have become fairly comfortable with it over the year. One example is that rather than having a "Save" button to save setting, you click the "Entry" button. As I said, not very intuitive.
I have found the GDC server to be very stable. I don't recall a single problem over the year. The GUI is functional, but not very pretty. And access to some of the commands is awkward. For example, it take too many "clicks" to get to the screen where you can manually execute automation cues. However, I did see considerable improvements when we went from version 7.7a to 7.7b. Hopefully this will improve even more with future updates, although I understand that the Cinedigm LMS with substantially change the GDC interface.
The MasterImage 3D does it's job. It's been running virtually non-stop for a year with no issues beyond cleaning the polarization disk. We did have a bug or something get sucked into the disk and result in it needing to be changed. That is probably the most serious issue/disadvantage I've come across with the MasterImage unit.
Right now I have two of five screens with the setup described above. Very shortly I will be getting the other three screens converted to the same - minus the 3D. Because I have never worked with any other equipment, I have no basis for comparison.
I did help install a RealD unit at another location and I will say the one advantage to MasterImage is that it can easily be moved to another 3D capable screen.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joris Springer
Film Handler
Posts: 83
From: Almere, Flevoland, The Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2007
|
posted 09-15-2011 05:58 PM
We use at my work a Barco DP2k32B for the largest theater combined with Master Image and DoReMi server. A Barco DP100 for the 2nd largest combined with DoReMi and Master Image and for the smallest theater we have a Barco DP90 combined with Master Image.
Personally I think the DP2k32B is just awesome, we don't have the small screen but just use the communicator software and despite for a small glitch (screen needs to be put in focus after every bulb change) it just works perfectly (though the DoReMi is one of their first 3D capable ones and so it is very slow when uploading movies through USB, I mean seriously, a Pentium 4 processor...)
The DP100 on the other hand is wel, a problem child, think it is running on engine number 9! (no joke) It runs quite hot and it does not like that we switched it to 6.5K bulbs because well, a CLO of 5.5 is not what we wanted, now it runs at 10, still not enough but better. The machine is just one of the first ones (2004) and it is on the list of being replaced but it just takes time. And well, it has earned it's retirement after all it has been through you could say. The DoReMi is however also slow since it is the same one as in the other theater.
The DP90 is working quite great actually, never had any real problems besides with the DLPS which keeps on giving the "atleast one could not be found" error once in a while, sometimes a reboot can fix it but sometimes it means the DLPS needs to be replaced. Think we are with that one already at number 4. Also here the DoReMi is just very slow so hope to get new ones soon .
I am glad however that we no longer have Xpandd, not because of the picture quality but because people just kept on destroying the glasses here in my city.
We don't have a TMS yet so we still need to upload all by moving the HDD from one theater to the other one and well, sometimes it means that it is just a real tight squeeze . But we are getting there slowly.
What I mostly like about the Barco's however is their lamp house, exchanging bulbs is just very easy and very fast. Hard to make a mistake there and all the room you can wish for when you replace them. Not like the Vic5's we have running here .
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carsten Kurz
Film God
Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009
|
posted 12-12-2011 06:33 AM
Aside from 4k, ShowVault is also a better choice if you want to have an option on HighFrameRate 3D. The costs for ShowVault + IMB is not higher than for a plain-vanilla DCP-2k4, and it splits the possible replacement/upgrade cost for the future between Server/SMS and IMB.
With the limited options of Dual HDSI, I would consider conventional servers outdated already now. Dolby has their SMS/IMB solution ready, Barco, Christie, etc.
Although I would prefer if the Doremi had a Gigabit-Interface following DCOSA , not their, well, proprietary, PCI-e port.
- Carsten
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 10 pages: 1 2 3 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|