Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » Barco Series 4 (Page 4)

 
This topic comprises 8 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8 
 
Author Topic: Barco Series 4
Tom Bert
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 134
From: Belgium
Registered: Apr 2010


 - posted 06-28-2019 03:08 AM      Profile for Tom Bert   Email Tom Bert   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Marco Giustini
what is the RAID kit made of?
It was an add-on board (HW RAID controller) and is now a new add-on board (running a new RAID controller that adds SSD support to ICMP): https://www.barco.com/nl/support/spare-parts/r9801854

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 06-28-2019 03:39 AM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think the storage limitations of the existing models are now easy to overcome with the direct play feature. As far as I see, recent versions even allow to use direct play in SPLs.
Admittedly, playing from local RAID storage after a full ingest incl. file check should still be the preferred method. But these checks can and should be done ahead of time on the external storage media as well.

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 06-28-2019 05:06 AM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks Tom - interesting that SSD drives require new RAID controller board. Not being sarcastic here, I just didn't know that.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-28-2019 07:20 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It might be that they are not only going to SSD but also to larger 4TB drives that caused the requirement.

Carsten, the Direct Play feature is pretty cool. I was shocked when it worked, without incident off of USB2.0 in one of my tests. Since I was using extension cables on a particular installation, I wanted to put it through its paces with USB3.0 (25-foot cables, active). Perfect. So, for yucks, I plugged the USB 2.0 cable into the CRU drive and still perfect!

As I said before, there is a lot I like about the ICMP. I just need its reliability to get better and that includes things like "ingest" where I've seen it not recognize anything plugged into the USB ports until it was power cycled.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 07-05-2019 12:04 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Tom Bert
The use of any non-validated drives (like before) is not allowed and damages will not be covered under warranty when we see use of such non-approved drives in the logs.
I can't speak for any other jurisdiction, but my understanding (disclaimer - IANAL) is that under California law (BPC § 22907), warranty claims involving non-manufacturer approved parts can only be refused if the non-approved part(s) caused the problem that the warranty claim is being made in respect of.

So, for example, if a non-approved model of hard drive draws more amps than the IMS's power supply is designed to provide and that fries the power supply, that would be legitimate grounds for refusing a warranty claim. But if a media block battery dies while a server in warranty has non-approved drives in use, that would not be permissible grounds for refusing the claim (unless the manufacturer could prove, on a balance of probabilities, that the non-approved drives caused the battery failure).

On a more general level, I would hope that all manufacturers would apply common sense in this sort of situation: using anything less than a very solid and irrefutable reason for refusing a warranty claim - especially given the price of warranty extensions on major capital cinema equipment - will start to have an effect on sales figures pretty quickly, I'd have thought.

 |  IP: Logged

Alan Gouger
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 501
From: Bradenton, FL, USA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 07-05-2019 01:20 PM      Profile for Alan Gouger   Author's Homepage   Email Alan Gouger   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A few things that are not working if using the ICMP that work otherwise.

Using the ICP Enigma Control Program the Convergence feature not working.

If you have a need to create a custom pcf file, maybe your art house, if bumping any of the following by one digit, contrast, brightness, color, any transition between trailers or feature you get a bright orange flash between transitions.

If creating a custom pcf file and placing it in a macro the ICMP will not recall it you must manually select it during playback. It is then lost again if there are any content transitions.

HDMI input, I realize this input is not a priority but worth mentioning. If creating a custom pcf file most features are not working, contrast, brightness, color saturation. Storing the custom pcf is allowed but it will not recall it.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 07-05-2019 05:12 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah...the ICMP is definitely a mixed bag.

As to warranty, I would think that they could claim that if say you had skipping/freezing during playback without using a an approved drive, they could (and likely would) deny any warranty claim of a defective server since you chose to use non-approved parts. They never claimed it worked with EVERY drive, just specific drives.

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 07-05-2019 05:52 PM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, as long as they allow you to buy their recommended drives through general IT supply, I have no problem with that. That said, it seems as if the original 1TB drive, the 2.5" Cinemastar C5K1000, have gone out of production, they are nearly impossible to find. The 2TB Seagate ST2000NX0253 is no trouble to source, though.

Alan - I guess the ICMP was never built to fully support the original TI tool set.

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 07-05-2019 06:19 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In California, the law came about because of string of scandals involving auto dealerships trying to wriggle out of warranty claims because aftermarket parts were used, even if they were totally irrelevant to the warranty claim. There was even one case in which the timing belt of a nearly new car broke, and the dealership refused to cover the repair under warranty, because they found a non-approved model of bulb in one of the headlights.

So that law was created to ensure a healthy, competitive market in aftermarket parts. But my understanding (and again, IANAL) is that it doesn't just apply to automobiles, but to all equipment warranties: the use of an aftermarket part that is not approved by the equipment manufacturer is only valid grounds for refusing a warranty claim if that part directly caused the problem that is the subject of the claim.

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 07-06-2019 08:26 AM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Similar laws are also applicable in the EU, but you need to be careful if they apply to you as a business. Consumers are generally well protected, but a lot of those laws don't count for business deals.

Then, it's also most often the little guy v.s. the giant. If the giant doesn't honor your warranty, what are you going to do as a single screen? Close up shop while you await the outcome of a trial that could last years?

Please note that I'm not implying Barco is such a party. Up until now they've been relatively fair regarding warranty cases. I know that some have had other experiences, but at least for us, they've never made a great deal out of broken parts that were clearly still under warranty.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 07-06-2019 09:42 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The provision about non-approved parts and warranties is both in the California Business Code and consumer legislation. Businesses use automobiles as well as consumers, so the scandals of the 1980s resulted in the protection being applied to both.

quote: Marcel Birgelen
Then, it's also most often the little guy v.s. the giant. If the giant doesn't honor your warranty, what are you going to do as a single screen? Close up shop while you await the outcome of a trial that could last years?
It's more likely that you would make a mental note to avoid buying products and/or warranty extensions from that manufacturer in the future, and advise that course of action to anyone who will listen to you.

Likewise, I am not targeting Barco specifically here: in fact, their response to warranty claims has been consistently better than that of most of the manufacturers whose products I service. I have never known them to refuse a claim for a projector that is in warranty for any reason. In fact, they will sometimes offer to ship more parts than are needed, just in case, in order to expedite a repair (an example being a DP4K-19B that I currently have out of action with a suspected bad CCB: they are sending a backplane as well, even though I didn't ask for one). My only issue with Barco/Cinionic is that sometimes they don't respond to emailed help requests until you follow them up with a phone call.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 07-07-2019 11:16 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I also think the 90-day parts warranty is a bit pathetic. Is that all they think that the part should operate? 90-days? How about at least a year on parts, like the others.

 |  IP: Logged

Jarod Reddig
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 513
From: Hays, Ks
Registered: Jun 2011


 - posted 07-09-2019 09:11 PM      Profile for Jarod Reddig   Email Jarod Reddig   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
90 days is indeed pathetic.

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 07-09-2019 09:45 PM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Guttag
I also think the 90-day parts warranty is a bit pathetic. Is that all they think that the part should operate? 90-days? How about at least a year on parts, like the others.
To be fair, I've gotten some leeway from them on this in the past. But indeed, the 90 day part warranty on non-consumables is pretty idiotic.

I think they're legally on thin ice there as well, at least within the E.U. and they know it and henceforth usually don't make a big deal out of it, when something fails after day 101 for example.

Although b2b contracts allow you to reduce the 2 year minimum warranty to something lower, the law states that despite that, terms should still be reasonable. You could state that a 90-day warranty on a 10K Euro/USD item isn't entirely reasonable.

But it's their way of pushing you to buying into extended warranties, which, since their recent price adjustments, start to make more sense too.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 07-10-2019 06:28 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
How about the 90-day warranty on a light-engine? Those are much more than $10K...even for the 6E!

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 8 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.