Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Your choice of five films this year. (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
Author Topic: Your choice of five films this year.
John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 04-29-2004 12:07 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This month's American Cinematographer (May 2004 issue) has several articles about "Van Helsing". Allen Daviau ASC is the cinematographer, and the VFX are by ILM's Scott Squires and Ben Snow. Some pretty good production values on set.

Edit: Kodak just put an article on-line:

http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/newsletters/inCamera/apr2004/vanhelsing.shtml

quote:
Van Helsing
How Allen Daviau, ASC Created a Fantasy Look
Get ready for a breathtaking journey to the past. The year is 1898, and Dr. Abraham Van Helsing is in Transylvania in Eastern Europe, determined to find and defeat Count Dracula. It’s not an uncommon theme.

More than 200 motion pictures in almost a dozen languages have featured Dracula in their titles during the relatively short history of film. Many other movies have focused on Frankenstein, Wolf Man and Hyde. All of those scary fictional characters, their minions and adversaries have roles in Van Helsing.

“My first impressions when I read the script were that it’s a homage to the Universal Studios horror films of the 1960s, and a huge opportunity to entertain and involve the audience in a compelling adventure,” says Allen Daviau, ASC.

His connection to Van Helsing began with a phone call from executive producer Sam Mercer. They had met when Daviau lensed Congo in 1995. Van Helsing was a different type of story for the cinematographer who has earned Oscar nominations for E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, The Color Purple, Empire of the Sun, Avalon and Bugsy, in addition to rendering images for such memorable films as The Falcon and the Snowman and Fearless.

Mercer outlined the story and asked Daviau if he was interested in reading the script and meeting with the film’s director Stephen Sommers. Daviau explains that he was a childhood fan of the genre. He saw most of Universal’s 1960s monster films more than once, and can still recite the stories, describe the moods, and comment on the “tremendous” performances.

He met Sommers and producer Bob Ducsay on the same day. Sommers has written and directed such thrillers as The Scorpion King, The Mummy and The Mummy Returns. Ducsay edited three of the director’s previous films.

Kidding with the genre
In the early Dracula movies, Van Helsing was an older, professorial scientist who was determined to bring Dracula down. In Sommers’ screenplay, Van Helsing is a younger man hired by the Vatican. He is accompanied by a monk who is a scientific whiz. Van Helsing meets Dr. Frankenstein, his hapless servant Igor and the monster they created. He also confronts the Wolf Man, and battles with Hyde in the belfry and on the street in front of the church at Notre Dame. Anna Valerious is also at the hub of the story. Her family spawned Dracula 400 years ago, and none of them can pass through the gates of heaven while the vampire is alive and claiming victims. Dracula and three of the vampire’s beautiful brides come onto the scene a little later.

“There’s a joy in Steve’s writing,” Daviau says. “He doesn’t mind kidding with the genre, but there is also tremendous depth in the characters. They are people you can understand and that helps to sweep the audience into the story.”

During pre-production they viewed a number of the older Dracula, Frankenstein, etc. films, including some of the more obscure ones that Daviau had never seen before. He also referenced his own laser disk collection and found inspiration in the original Dracula, photographed by Karl Freund in 1931.

They made an early decision to be true to the story and the mood. They decided the script called for an almost monochrome look with night and interior lighting mainly motivated by torches, oil lamps and sometimes colder, blue moonlight. There are occasional splashes of color in scenes like a costume ball for vampires.

“Allan Cameron (production designer) and I suggested composing Van Helsing in Academy widescreen ratio 1.85:1 with faster spherical lenses,” Daviau says. “It’s a homage to 1930s movies with vertical castles and towers. There are also scenes with people flying. Vertical space gave us more freedom to tell the story. We shot a few tests, showed them to Stephen (Sommers) and he agreed.”

During Daviau’s first meeting with Ducsay, they discussed the possibility of finishing the film in a digital intermediate process, which would enable the cinematographer to put final painterly touches on an almost monotone look. He shot a test that was scanned and converted to digital files at EFILM in Los Angeles. Daviau timed the film, and experimented with the look in collaboration with digital intermediate colorist Steven Scott.

Additional testing was done in conjunction with Industrial Light & Magic Co., which ultimately provided many visual effects shots, including wire removal and seamless compositing of blue screen elements with the flying vampire’s brides.

Torchlight
“Kodak introduced the VISION2 (500T 5218) film while we were in pre-production,” Daviau says. “I shot a test, and decided it had the right characteristics for a digital intermediate process, including an extended contrast range and minimal grain.”

They scouted locations in Prague and found architecture, including castles, high walls, streets and interior settings in an old cathedral that were right for the look and mood of the film. While scouting, Daviau realized how important having the right torchlight was going to be in very large interiors. His gaffer, Larry Wallace, took charge of that situation by assembling some experts who helped design a torchlight with a dimmer control and built-in flicker circuit. They used standard light bulbs that were dipped in orange dye that acted like a CTO filter.

The torchlight was designed to operate with the 220 volt, 50 cycles electrical system used in Europe, for torch lit scenes in Anna Valerious’ castle and several other locations. Daviau also combined the lamps with real torches with flames in many scenes.

Sommers cast Hugh Jackson as Van Helsing, Kate Beckinsale as Anna Valerious, Richard Roxburgh, a Shakespearian actor from Australia, as Dracula, Shuler Hensley as Frankenstein, Will Kemp as the Wolf Man, supported by a talented ensemble cast. Daviau shot costume and make-up tests with the main cast before leaving for Prague.

“Most of the costumes are black, brown and dark grey, because those were the colors used in that time and place,” Daviau says. “Gabriella Pescucci, the costume designer was fabulous. She designed a dark brown leather coat for Van Helsing. It had a luminous glow that is visible in very contrasty scenes. We had most characters dressed in black in most scenes. The 5218 (film) has an incredible contrast range that really helped in those situations.”

Daviau consulted with cinematographer Dean Semler, ASC, ACS, who had filmed XXX in Prague, about locations and for advice on augmenting his American camera crew.

“Dean had good things to say about Barrandov Studios and the lab they operate, which provided great film dailies and a screening room,” he says. “We built a few sets in the studio, including a cave with various shafts leading to the outside and some castle interiors that were not shot on location.”

About half of the film was shot in and around Prague, and the rest on sets in Los Angeles. Daviau notes that at the beginning of spring, they worked with assistant director Artist Robinson to schedule shooting at dusk and dawn when the sun was low on the horizon.

“Near the end of our time in the Czech Republic, we were shooting in a Transylvanian village that Allan (Cameron) designed outside of Prague,” Daviau recalls. “We used a Cablecam for an exciting scene where the three brides of Dracula shock everybody by attacking in daytime. They were flying around, snatching people off the ground and biting their necks. We pre-visualized those shots and flew the Cablecam with tremendous whirls and twirls and barrel rolls. It required quite a rig.”



Dramatic
A dramatic Cablecam point-of-view shot shows the audience a scene from the perspective of one of Dracula’s brides as she flies into the village from the next town. The shot begins high on a hill. She plunges into the village, weaving to avoid buildings, while chasing Van Helsing across the square towards the church. In another shot, Van Helsing fires an arrow and the Cablecam tracks with it to its destination. Key grip Jim Shelton also employed 30 and 50 foot Technocranes for additional dynamic camera moves. The basic Panavision package used by operators Paul Babin and Tom Connole included Panaflex Platinum and XL cameras and an ARRI 435 mainly for ramping slow-motion shots, and a complete set of Primo prime and zoom lenses. The second unit led by cinematographer Josh Bleibtreu carried a similar camera package.

“The vampire’s costume ball was staged in a former cathedral,” he says. “It was absolutely fantastic, but there were priceless 400- to 600-year-old paintings in the small lofts and altars that we used for lighting positions, so we had to be very careful. Allan Cameron dressed it to resemble a great ballroom in a castle. He gave us places to hide lamps, including torchlights with flicker circuits that kept the light in subtle motion.”

They viewed film dailies every day. Daviau explains that it gave everyone a much better idea of how visual nuances worked when a film print was magnified and projected on a big screen. Ducsay also watched every foot of dailies. Daviau notes that there are many ways that a video transfer can miss the mark, particularly when you’re shooting at low light levels and shadow details are important.

They shot big interior scenes on stages at the old Hughes aircraft construction plant where the Spruce Goose was built near Los Angeles, including about two weeks of bluescreen shots for visual effects sequences of Dracula’s brides flying. They also filmed interior scenes that were supposed to be in Dracula’s palace on a big exterior lot at an old McDonnell Douglas plant in nearby Downey, California.

“We had torches and fire fixtures that provided flame sources,” Daviau recalls. “There was a huge bridge nearby that we used as a platform for some big Bebee lights. I’m a big believer in the big light theory, because that puts the law of Inverse Square on your side. When you have big lamps far away, there is a consistency in lighting throughout the scene that looks and feels believable without unexplained shadows. It’s an old fashioned way of lighting that worked for Van Helsing because the new stock enabled us to use real flames in conjunction with the cold moonlight.”

Daviau tried to avoid shooting wider open than T2.8, because he believes that’s where the lenses work best, especially when there are actors moving around. On some big night exteriors, he opened up to T2.0. The cinematographer used very little filtration or diffusion. Daviau says he had that flexibility, because he knew it would be relatively easy to fine-tune the images while he was timing at EFILM.

“I believe Steve Sommers has succeeded in creating a story that will scare the audience and make them laugh at the same time, and that isn’t easy to do,” he concludes.




[ 04-29-2004, 01:34 PM: Message edited by: John Pytlak ]

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Price
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1714
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-29-2004 02:34 PM      Profile for Ian Price   Email Ian Price   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually I think that many of those films will flop. But I'm betting the Shrek 2 will work in the box office. I'm not going to see it.

I think you're dead wrong about Harry Potter 3. There is a strong base of interest and I'm hoping that the new director will inject some life in to the series.

 |  IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 04-29-2004 02:51 PM      Profile for Darryl Spicer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Scratch Sky Captain off of my list. Release date hase been moved to September 17th do to the opening of Spiderman 2 5 days later.

Sky Captain

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Wilbert
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 590
From: Bellingham, WA, USA
Registered: Mar 2002


 - posted 04-29-2004 04:21 PM      Profile for Adam Wilbert   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Wilbert   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
NOOO!!! Sky Captain has been the only summer movie I've been looking forward to since I saw the trailer on LOTR:ROTK. Whats it about KD? Flying space robots a la Iron Giant. Thats good enough for me. If I had $150 Mil to blow, i'd prove you all wrong.

-Adam

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-29-2004 05:47 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I was standing in back of the audience the night we debuted the first trailer for Harry Potter/Azkaban. You could hear and feel a wave of excitement go over the audience. The extra 6 months wait was a good idea. It'll do fine.

Shrek 2: Will do fine. Although the teaser trailer left something to be desired. (That's the only trailer we've been able to get as yet. The poster is cool though.)

King Arthur: Scoff if you want, but I was saying all the same stuff last year about Pirates. I still wouldn't bet the rent, but if the movie is "there" it'll do fine.

Day After Tomorrow: Ehhhh, probably will disappoint after a huge opening.

Garfield: Absolutely will flop. The comic strip hasn't been reliably funny in years. This movie is about 10 years too late.

Alien Vs. Predator: Probably a disappointment overall, but again will have a giant opening weekend. In fact I think it'll have one of the best opening weekends of the summer, followed by one of the largest drops.

Van Helsing: A mid-level hit at best, but you never know...it could pull in the Mummy crowd, if that happens it'll be fine. The kids are excited for this one.

I Robot: I think this will flop. Looks stupid, according to my teenage staff. Anything the kids say "looks stupid" is bound for failure.

The movies I'm pulling for are Stepford Wives, Manchurian Candidate, Bourne Supremacy, The Village, and Terminal. Hopefully they won't get lost among all the kid-stuff.

 |  IP: Logged

Kamakshipalya Dhananjay
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 190
From: Bangalore, India
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 05-01-2004 12:11 AM      Profile for Kamakshipalya Dhananjay   Email Kamakshipalya Dhananjay   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Let me rearrange that list in terms of release dates :

1. Van Helsing. May-7

2. Shrek 2. May-21

3. The Day After Tomorrow. May-28

4. Harry Potter And The Prisoner of Azkaban. June-4

5. Garfield. June-11

6. Around The World in 80 Days. June-16

7. King Arthur. July-7

8. I, Robot. July-16

9. Alien V Predator. Aug-13

10. Skycaptain And The World Of Tomorrow. Sep.17

Why do we really need to say anything now ? These dates are fast approaching and we only need wait. And we will see these movies in the list will succumb - and we will have a blockbuster 'movie-making-sham' this summer.

So, like that Bride clearing names off her diary, lets start with

VAN HELSING, Appointment-May.7

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Allen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 688
From: Evansville, IN, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 05-05-2004 05:20 PM      Profile for Brad Allen   Email Brad Allen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In this part of the world, Shrek 2 & Harry P will rule.

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Greco
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1180
From: Plant City, FL
Registered: Nov 2003


 - posted 05-09-2004 03:58 PM      Profile for Richard Greco   Email Richard Greco   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Kamakshipalya Dhananjay
10. Van Helsing.
A sheer nonsense. These kind films have always been. Only that few films really preserved the deceitful tradition of making you feel there is something really in such films. Van Helsing will not be one of them. In fact, if people are waiting for the realisation that they have been watching trash all along and expecting more of it, this film could just be the flick that will deliver this sacred realiastion to the masses.

Well.......

Your first WRONG guess is Van Helsing
Currently on boxofficemojo.com, the US estimates are 54.6 million. Adding to that the 53 million dollars overseas and you've got yourself 107.6 million dollars on opening weekend worldwide. The official numbers are out tomorrow but as I expected, your first disappointment is a success.

Now if you had said New York Minute as a flop, I'd believe you...

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 05-09-2004 04:17 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"Van Helsing" is NOT out of the woods for ending up as a box office disappointment.

First, the critical response has not been great. Last time I checked, Rotten Tomatoes had it running at around 20% positive on word of mouth. Sounds certified rotten to me.

Even with the movie making $50+ million opening weekend, please consider this movie cost around $180 million to make. Throw in another $50+ million in marketing costs and you have quite a bit of ground the show has to make up to break even.

Look for a massive percentage drop-off in attendance next weekend. I would not be surprised to see theaters removing it by the end of the month.

 |  IP: Logged

Ron Lacheur
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 650
From: British Columbia, Canada
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 05-09-2004 08:49 PM      Profile for Ron Lacheur   Email Ron Lacheur   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've never really understood the importance of a big opening weekend and movies not making back what they produced.

Eventually, all movies make back what they cost. Look at Showgirls, a flop on it's initial run, but theaters started running it for midnight showings and it gained cult status, and made big profits.

 |  IP: Logged

Kamakshipalya Dhananjay
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 190
From: Bangalore, India
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 05-10-2004 12:55 AM      Profile for Kamakshipalya Dhananjay   Email Kamakshipalya Dhananjay   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, VAN HELSING seems more like a 3 day movie and I am sure Monday numbers will prove that. Please see BOXOFFICEPROPHETS.Com which certifies the weekend take as rather disappointing.

When adjusted for inflation, both Mummy 1 & 2 earned more than $54 Million. And with a production budget alone of 160 million and a worldwide marketing budget of not less than 50 million, VAN HELSING is quite unlike a 'Boxoffice'. Also, it has had a disturbing internal multiplier of 2.7. And I predict it will drop by not less than 80 % next weekend.

So, I still maintain it is going to find it difficult to breach that 100 million mark.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 05-10-2004 01:06 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Ron Lacheur
I've never really understood the importance of a big opening weekend and movies not making back what they produced.
Well, it kinda has to do with the price of borrowing money --in other words, making interest payments.

It may not be all that big a deal for a movie studio to not get an immediate return on a movie that cost $20 million or $30 million to make. But when the production and marketing costs equal near a quarter billion dollars, a great deal of it has to be made back immediately otherwise it puts the studio in quite a hurt-locker.

Much of the funding for most films is done with a lot of borrowed money that gathers interest on a daily basis. This is one of the big reasons why the studios flood the theatrical market with many thousands of prints (and honestly, the exhibitors should sue the living shit out of Hollywood for this practice --or at least negotiate some better rental terms). They want as much of that box-office gross to come back to them as fast as possible. It lessens their amount of interest payments. In fact, some studios gamble so far in advance that their fortunes depend a great deal on the relative speed of the return coming back to them. It's especially important with the daily changes in stock prices, values of stock options, etc.

If "Van Helsing" takes its time to break even, heads will roll over at Universal. No question about it. It is not really enough for the film to break even during the DVD release. Six months worth of interest payments on a possible nine-figure sum of borrowed money is pretty big, even with the Fed prime rate down near a 40 year low.

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Lockridge
Film Handler

Posts: 20
From: Indiana, USA
Registered: Jul 2002


 - posted 05-10-2004 07:03 PM      Profile for Tim Lockridge   Email Tim Lockridge   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I really think that the Village could be one of the summer's biggest grossers. The Sixth Sense and Signs both grossed more than 200mil in the US, and Unbreakable -- though deemed a disappointment -- passed 90mil and has since developed a cult following.

Simply put, M. Night is one of the hottest directors in Hollywood right now, and he really has a knack for late-summer boxoffice success. I think the Village will easily be in this summer's top five... and will end up near the top of the year's list too.

Of course, we can't forget about Spiderman 2... which probably has the largest built-in audience of the year, and whose predecessor is the #5 grossing film of all time -- behind only two Star Wars, ET, and Titanic.

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Fuentes
Mmmm, Dr. Pepper!

Posts: 1168
From: Corpus Christi, TX United States
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 05-11-2004 02:08 PM      Profile for Jeremy Fuentes   Email Jeremy Fuentes   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Kamakshipalya Dhananjay
So, I still maintain it is going to find it difficult to breach that 100 million mark.
quote: Richard Greco
the US estimates are 54.6 million. Adding to that the 53 million dollars overseas and you've got yourself 107.6 million dollars on opening weekend worldwide.
What am I missing here, besides production cost, which was not discussed or even mentioned in your predictions for the top 10 disappointments.

 |  IP: Logged

Kamakshipalya Dhananjay
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 190
From: Bangalore, India
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 05-12-2004 12:55 AM      Profile for Kamakshipalya Dhananjay   Email Kamakshipalya Dhananjay   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, my prediction is only for North American Tally. So, I maintain still that Van Helsing will not breach the 100 million mark for North America. This was billed to be the first big disappointment of the Summer. So is it.

After the Monday numbers, anybody here not convinced yet that VAN HELSING will not climb the 100 million mark ?

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.