Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » The Psychology of Showing DVD/BluRay (Page 4)

 
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
Author Topic: The Psychology of Showing DVD/BluRay
Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-31-2010 07:56 PM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Availability is sort of a multi-track operation. Some of the studios have platter prints and "archive" prints, which are not supposed to have their heads are tails cut, but always do by the time they get here. We're a two-machine operation, and the distributors which care always make sure to ask.

Then it is a matter of timing and money. We showed Psycho in October the same reason everyone else did, it is Halloween related. As ours was only a one night show in a small market, we were pretty low priority. The places that were showing multiple nights, in bigger markets and, most likely, booked it months before we did (and we booked two months out) are going to get the good 35mm print.

Nonetheless, I believe we were the second highest grossing screen in town that night.

We got a fairly decent copy of The Big Lebowski in September, and Animal House before that. It is just there are very few prints available, and even fewer being restruck.

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 10-31-2010 08:28 PM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't know why I didn't think of this sooner -- but why not just choose another movie?

PSYCHO isn't especially associated with Halloween. I mean, HALLOWEEN is more of an obvious choice, for example.

Why not book an actual film print of something that was appropriate, marketable and available?

 |  IP: Logged

Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-31-2010 08:57 PM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've got a board committee to deal with, it was their choice. Just like Stripes in a couple of weeks.

Thankfully, they only pick these special one off shows. If it was totally up to me, yeah, no DVD's.

 |  IP: Logged

David E. Nedrow
Master Film Handler

Posts: 368
From: Columbus, OH, USA
Registered: Oct 2008


 - posted 10-31-2010 09:30 PM      Profile for David E. Nedrow   Author's Homepage   Email David E. Nedrow   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Martin,

Of the six "archive" prints we received for a 24-hour horror marathon on the 23rd, 5 had the heads and tails cut. One even just had the leaders masking taped on, but not taped down, so film was all over the place in the cans. That one generated a complaint call to the distributor. These prints are supposed to be changeover only, but it's clear there's some "cheating" going on.

PSYCHO came in with cut leaders, but was in very good condition. ISLAND OF LOST SOULS was uncut and looked stellar. I don't think anyone in the audience had ever seen a print of this film looking this nice. I know I hadn't. The film is a bit dark to begin with, but the density of the print was something else. And, it was struck on a very heavy base, so Universal deserves some props for this one.

-David

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 10-31-2010 09:35 PM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Martin McCaffery
I've got a board committee to deal with
Ohhhhhh.

That ends that.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 11-01-2010 02:32 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: David E. Nedrow
These prints are supposed to be changeover only, but it's clear there's some "cheating" going on.
Cutting the leaders and building to 6000 foot reels for changeover operation is TECHNICALLY still changeover operation.

That of course is NOT what the studios mean, but it happens all the time.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 11-01-2010 06:48 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Some of these archives have a no-splice/no repair clause in them...if there is a problem with the print...you are to report it immediately and not necessarily repair it yourself. After all, how are they to know your splicing capability? If you want to run THEIR print, you play by THEIR rules.

Many of the "archive" prints do indeed have head/tail splices...they certainly don't want to add to that.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 11-01-2010 09:06 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Any excellent operator can peel the existing splices and return the print EXACTLY as shipped. Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Tom Petrov
Five Guys Lover

Posts: 1121
From: El Paso, TX
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 11-01-2010 02:24 PM      Profile for Tom Petrov     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Martin McCaffery
They can't watch the film they "own" on a big screen, in a theatre, with 100 other people at their house, so what is it about "owning" the DVD that makes them feel ripped off seeing one in the theatre?
Makes sence, why pay to for a movie twice if in fact alreay own it.

 |  IP: Logged

Mitchell Dvoskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1869
From: West Milford, NJ, USA
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 11-01-2010 02:41 PM      Profile for Mitchell Dvoskin   Email Mitchell Dvoskin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Martin McCaffery
They can't watch the film they "own" on a big screen, in a theatre, with 100 other people at their house, so what is it about "owning" the DVD that makes them feel ripped off seeing one in the theatre?
If "big" is important, they certainly can watch on a "big" screen at home. Front HD 1080p projectors are available these days for under 2 grand. A 12' wide screen at home, when you are sitting 18' feet back from the screen, gives you the same emotional impact as a 30' screen sitting 50 feet back.

Most people who have a problem with paying to see a DVD/BLURAY don't care if they can see it with a 100 other people. In fact, my guess is most would rather not.

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 11-01-2010 04:32 PM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You got THAT right!

 |  IP: Logged

Don Furr
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 509
From: Sun City, Ca USA
Registered: Nov 2002


 - posted 11-01-2010 06:17 PM      Profile for Don Furr   Email Don Furr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just finished running the first 10 minutes of the new Blu Ray "Sound of Music" in my screning room. 11' screen sitting 18 feet back looks pretty damn good to me....and that's on a 1080P LCD. The track is kick-ass. [beer]

Don

 |  IP: Logged

Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-01-2010 07:50 PM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mitchell Dvoskin
Most people who have a problem with paying to see a DVD/BLURAY don't care if they can see it with a 100 other people. In fact, my guess is most would rather not.
Which brings us around again to the topic of this thread. If they "own" it already, and that matters, why bother going to the theatre no matter what the format?

Oh well.

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Weigel
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1062
From: Edmond, OK, USA
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 11-01-2010 08:08 PM      Profile for Jeremy Weigel   Email Jeremy Weigel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think it just comes down the nostalgia factor. They want to re-experience it the way they first saw it, which for some is more than just seeing it on the "big" screen. Having the occasional dust specs, minor scratches, the change over cues, etc. that all add to the look and "feel" of watching film.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-01-2010 08:53 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I am quite surprised that no projector manufacturer or BluRay player maker has come up with a "film-ize" setting that puts in a few random dust specks, simulated splices, etc. I mean you can do it with cheap video editing software, why not on a $60,000 projector?

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.