|
|
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
|
|
Author
|
Topic: The Psychology of Showing DVD/BluRay
|
Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 10-31-2010 07:56 PM
Availability is sort of a multi-track operation. Some of the studios have platter prints and "archive" prints, which are not supposed to have their heads are tails cut, but always do by the time they get here. We're a two-machine operation, and the distributors which care always make sure to ask.
Then it is a matter of timing and money. We showed Psycho in October the same reason everyone else did, it is Halloween related. As ours was only a one night show in a small market, we were pretty low priority. The places that were showing multiple nights, in bigger markets and, most likely, booked it months before we did (and we booked two months out) are going to get the good 35mm print.
Nonetheless, I believe we were the second highest grossing screen in town that night.
We got a fairly decent copy of The Big Lebowski in September, and Animal House before that. It is just there are very few prints available, and even fewer being restruck.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
David E. Nedrow
Master Film Handler

Posts: 368
From: Columbus, OH, USA
Registered: Oct 2008
|
posted 10-31-2010 09:30 PM
Martin,
Of the six "archive" prints we received for a 24-hour horror marathon on the 23rd, 5 had the heads and tails cut. One even just had the leaders masking taped on, but not taped down, so film was all over the place in the cans. That one generated a complaint call to the distributor. These prints are supposed to be changeover only, but it's clear there's some "cheating" going on.
PSYCHO came in with cut leaders, but was in very good condition. ISLAND OF LOST SOULS was uncut and looked stellar. I don't think anyone in the audience had ever seen a print of this film looking this nice. I know I hadn't. The film is a bit dark to begin with, but the density of the print was something else. And, it was struck on a very heavy base, so Universal deserves some props for this one.
-David
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|