|
|
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Upload your random pictures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 03-01-2005 01:54 AM
I guess it's an issue of public perception: doors blowing out, engines falling off the wing, a big airliner flying smack into the side of a mountain and another one ploughing a field a 300mph all make for dramatic images. Furthermore two of the disasters were both caught on camera as they happened, further adding to the negative publicity. By the same token the fact that the Hindenburg made over 20 transatlantic flights and Concordes operated for 20 years without any incident before the ones which ended their careers hasn't stopped both aircraft from becoming synonymous with, err, 'aviation safety issues'. Again, both the Hindenburg and Concorde disasters were photographed as they happened.
I suppose the fact that DC-10s are still in revenue earning service after three decades show that the design was fundamentally good and that the problems have been ironed out. They just don't inspire confidence, that's all. When I flew from Amsterdam to Minneapolis last November we arrived at the gate to find an empty stand with a sleek new Delta 777 on one side and a shiny KLM Airbus on the other. Eventually the DC-10 was pulled to our stand by a tractor. The paint was badly faded, there was soot all over the engine housings, and the thing just basically looked unloved. Compared to the two aircraft either side it looked like something out of Austin Powers, and as Jason points out they sound and feel like something out of Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines: so much so that someone in the queue in front of me asked her partner: 'Are we supposed to be getting on that thing? Is it capable of flying?'. I'm sure it was excellently maintained and all the DC-10 flights I've taken passed without any problem, but in an industry where safety is such a big issue the appearance of it just didn't inspire confidence.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 101 pages: 1 2 3 ... 96 97 98 99 100 101
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|