Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Are you a smoker? (Page 8)

 
This topic comprises 12 pages: 1  2  3  ...  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12 
 
Author Topic: Are you a smoker?
Lyle Romer
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1400
From: Davie, FL, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 04-18-2010 11:37 AM      Profile for Lyle Romer   Email Lyle Romer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
I don't think such a system would work. Such a system would be heavily dependent on keeping as many smokers in the program as possible when odds are more likely a growing number of people would drop out of it.
Such a system would not be voluntary. My idea would be that you must present your cards to get charged the premium/tax in order to buy cigarettes. Of course the cost per pack to insure smokers would be quite high but if you are going to deliberately ingest something that makes it orders of magnitude more likely that you will need expensive medical care then you should pay for that right, not me in my insurance premium.

I know the same can be said for obesity but until you get to morbidly obese levels, the risks of major medical issues doesn't go up anywhere near as high as smoking makes it go.

Hey, I've got an idea......instead of us non-smoking, in decent shape people subsidising smokers and other high risk behavior people's medical care through our insurance premiums, let's return to the way things were 30 years ago when my parents had "major medical" coverage (which was cheap) for the unlikely things like terminal diseases, major illnesses and unlikely accidents. Normal medical care was paid out of pocket and was MUCH cheaper on a yearly basis than insurance coverage is now.

I've been to a Doctor maybe 5 times in the last 10 years (and once was to get a tetanus booster shot). Even if it was $250 a visit my care would have cost under $1300 for 10 years. Instead it has cost me/my employer thousands PER YEAR. I would imagine that there are a very high percentage of middle aged and younger people that would end up spending under $100 per month on major medical coverage and out of pocket regular care.

Of course now it will be illegal for me to do that and I'd have to pay a fine starting a few years from now.

 |  IP: Logged

Sean McKinnon
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1712
From: Peabody Massachusetts
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 04-18-2010 12:16 PM      Profile for Sean McKinnon   Author's Homepage   Email Sean McKinnon   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If smoking was put to a national vote and outlawed all together it would really suck for me but it would sit a lot better than a quasi governmental agency making up "laws" as they go along without any taxpayer input. I don't disagree with the bans so much as I disagree with how they were implemented. As I said earlier in this thread I feel that the free market system would take care of this issue in itself. If there is a large enough market for non smoking establishments they will be created. If enough non smokers choose not to patronize smoking establishments then business owners will have to go non smoking to stay in business.

What I find interesting is that they villify cigarettes for hurting the health of smokers and non smokers through second hand smoke. I don't drink so I see alcohol the same way. Alcohol use harms the liver and other parts of the body. It can cause cancer of the mouth, liver, throat, and stomach which also puts a burden pn the country's health care system. Some alcoholics due to thier disease are unable to hold down a steady job with health insurance so when they get sick from alcohol related illness they have to be treated at emergency rooms on the public dime. Smoking in and of itself does not affect one's ablility to hold down a job or pay for health insurance. Alcohol also hurts people who choose not to use it through drunk driving, alcohol related assault, etc...

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 04-18-2010 04:20 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm not really a fan of outlawing anything outright, but most smokers themselves cannot be considerate so they must be forced to be. They do not care if someone else might be bothered by their smoke. So why should it matter who gets bothered, smokers or non-smokers? Either way, someone will be bothered. Let's bother the minority. But I agree with Sean, it should be put to vote. I believe it was on the ballot 4 or so years ago here in Colorado and the ban passed.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 04-18-2010 06:54 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Lyle Romer
Such a system would not be voluntary. My idea would be that you must present your cards to get charged the premium/tax in order to buy cigarettes.
I wasn't clear in what I was saying. My term "drop out" of the system basically means the smokers would give up the habit because it was too expensive. And then the smokers who have been smokers for the long term still have some considerable chance of developing lung cancer anyway. That also turns out to be one the justificiations some people I know use to continue smoking.

quote: Lyle Romer
I know the same can be said for obesity but until you get to morbidly obese levels, the risks of major medical issues doesn't go up anywhere near as high as smoking makes it go.
That's not true. Lots of fairly thin people drop dead of massive heart attacks. You don't have to be obese to have high cholesterol and clogged arteries.

quote: Sean McKinnon
If there is a large enough market for non smoking establishments they will be created. If enough non smokers choose not to patronize smoking establishments then business owners will have to go non smoking to stay in business.
The problem is many non-smokers have simply tolerated smokers in places like bars and restaurants because they didn't want to get involved in any confrontation. There's at least a few smokers who get angry and even violent if someone nearby says their smoke is bothering them. It's either that or the person complaining about the smoke is called a pussy for having problem with it. This cultural factor is part of why the smoking bans are implemented. But even they don't entirely remove the element of confrontation. I've seen militant smokers raise all kinds of hell when told they couldn't smoke at Harlows, a local bar that has to have a non-smoking policy due to its entrance being in a hotel lobby.

quote: Sean McKinnon
I don't drink so I see alcohol the same way. Alcohol use harms the liver and other parts of the body. It can cause cancer of the mouth, liver, throat, and stomach which also puts a burden pn the country's health care system.
That's true, but far fewer people in the US die of alcohol abuse. The CDC says 13,000 Americans die every year from medical problems related to long term alcohol abuse. When you count alcohol related accidents and drunk driving deaths the toll is still well under 50,000. Roughly 400,000 Americans die annually due to long term smoking habits. Another 38,000 die every year from heart and lung disease acquired through second hand smoke. A non-smoker in a bar may have a greater chance of dying from second hand smoke than he does from the booze he's drinking.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 04-18-2010 08:31 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
And it's dubious to say that alcohol and second-hand smoke are comparable in that you drinking alcohol near me doesn't give me liver disease.

 |  IP: Logged

Sean McKinnon
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1712
From: Peabody Massachusetts
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 04-18-2010 10:28 PM      Profile for Sean McKinnon   Author's Homepage   Email Sean McKinnon   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You're right chris it is dubious to compare smoking to alcohol. I would assume that you would have to be around someone smoking a pack a day every day for a few years before you had any negative affects from it. A smoker doesn't get cancer from his/her first cigarette so I suppose neither would someone exposed to second hand smoke. On the other hand all it takes i getting hit by one drunk driver to kill not only you but anyone else in your vehicle.

Or let's look at it this way you are driving in a car with me smoking (Let's say I have smokes a whole pack before getting in the car) you have never been previously exposed to second hand smoke as uncomfortable as this may be it is unlikely that you will die from it. Now I am driving this same car and drinking a beer (after drinking let's say only 12 beers not 20 lsike the smokes) what are the chances you walk out of the car alive and not seriously injured?

So more people die a year from smoking but those deaths are after years and years and many hundreds of thousands of cigarettes. Whereas alcohol related death can occur after only a few drinks or can kill someone who has never had a drink in thier life.

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-18-2010 10:37 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I am a kind of cigarette smoking nihilist. I smoke WHEN and IF I decide to smoke.

I can smoke one cigarette and not smoke again for 2 years. I control when I want to smoke. Tobacco does not control me.

I never smoked until I was 18. My father would have beat the shit out of me if he ever caught me smoking... Literally. He beat the shit out of me for lesser things and he promised me an even more severe beating if he caught me smoking. Then he died. It was about a year after that when I figured that, since he couldn't beat the shit out of me anymore, I could smoke if I wanted to.

The first pack of cigarettes I ever smoked was a pack of Gauloises I picked up while in Paris. I only did it because I could. The old man couldn't do anything because he was dead. Besides, it was legal. (Far be it from me to break the law... [Roll Eyes] )

A few years later, I was smoking an average of two packs of Newports per day. Sometimes I would smoke more. That didn't include the joints I would smoke. What the fuck? Who was going to stop me?

I tried to quit a few times, mainly because I thought that was what I was supposed to do. I'd quit for a year then take it back up again. I think I quit two or three times. I don't know for sure. I never really counted.

I would smoke anything. I smoked Marlboro or Winston. I smoked lights or menthols with equal enjoyment. I went through a phase where I only smoked Dunhills and there was a time when I smoked Chesterfield Kings. The ones I liked the best were hand rolled cigarettes made from tobacco I got right out of the fields in North Carolina. (Or, at least, that is what the guy who sold the stuff to me said.)

Then there came a time when I just decided I was done smoking. I don't know... I was bored with it. Smoking didn't float my boat anymore. I only smoked because I was addicted. It took about a year to get down from 2+ packs of cigarettes per day to about half of a pack per day. I'm not certain but maybe my wife had a lot to do with it. After that, I started taking Wellburtin and chewing Nicorette. It took me about 4 months to totally quit. I didn't touch another cigarette for about 4 or 5 years.

Right now, I couldn't care less whether I smoke or don't smoke. In the last year, I have probably smoked about 6 to 10 cigarettes. I don't even remember. If I want to smoke, I'll cop a ciggy. If I don't want to smoke I won't. It took many years for me to come to this place in my life but, looking back, I can't understand, for the life of me, how anybody could let tobacco rule their life. (Mind you, tobacco DID rule my life for nearly 20 years!)

As I see it now, I don't see why a person can't smoke a single cigarette, a pack of cigarettes or even a whole carton of cigarettes if he wants to. But I also don't see why a person HAS to smoke a cigarette if he doesn't want to. If he enjoys smoking, why not? But, if he is smoking just to satisfy a habit, it makes no fucking sense!

Somebody who can't smoke a single cigarette just because he wants to smoke a single cigarette and not feel compelled to smoke the whole pack is a weakling in my book.

Somebody who smokes a cigarette just because he thinks other people will look upon him as "cool" or "though" is just as much a weakling.

Right now, I could take a smoke out of your pack, light it, take a drag from it, inhale it and hand the burning cigarette to you and I would not want to smoke another because I just don't fucking care about tobacco anymore.

As far as I am concerned, I could take it or leave it. If tobacco ceased to exist tomorrow, I would not miss it. If the skies opened up and it rained cigarettes, I would not care. I might smoke one just to see what they tasted like. (They'd probably taste like shit because they've been all over the ground.)

Yes, I know tobacco is addictive. I've been addicted. Honestly, I can't understand why people feel like they have to smoke when they don't really want to. Shouldn't you smoke because you enjoy it?

Bottom line: Smoke if you want. Don't smoke if you don't want. It's no skin off my ass.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 04-19-2010 03:38 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Smoking does not intoxicate and impair your judgment and reaction times like alcohol does, so comparisons are really hard between the two.

It is a person's own choice whether to smoke or not, I just wish (in my fantasy world) that nobody desired to smoke via their own free will.

 |  IP: Logged

Joshua Waaland
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 800
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 04-19-2010 09:05 AM      Profile for Joshua Waaland   Email Joshua Waaland   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I used to smoke during different times in my life. I had my first cigarette when I was about 10. I smoked a lot in high school and then stopped when I met my wife in college. It is hard sometimes when I drink or am stressed out to not want a cigarette. I know they say in constricts your blood vessels and should make you more anxious but it always had a calming effect on me.

We put it to a vote here in our county a few years ago and the voters put a ban in place against smoking in public places like restaurants and bars.

 |  IP: Logged

Sean McKinnon
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1712
From: Peabody Massachusetts
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 04-19-2010 12:28 PM      Profile for Sean McKinnon   Author's Homepage   Email Sean McKinnon   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That's my whole point Joe. Both nicotine and alcohol are addictive drugs that cause health problems not only to the person who chooses to use them but also can cause health problems to people around them who choose not to drink or smoke. My point is that alcohol addiction also causes severe mental harm to friends and family members of the addicted person that smoking in most cases does not. Smoking harms both the smoker and people around them but it does it very slowly over a long period of time. Alcohol also causes health problems to the heavy drinker slowly over a long period of time but due to it's intoxicating properties and it's impairment of judgement and motor skills it has the potential to harm both the user and the general public in a more immediate and catastrophic nature. How many cigarettes does it take to get lung cancer? I don't know but would guess more than 12. How many beers does it take to cause a drunk driving accident?

What I am trying to say is that these are two addictive substances that cause long term health problems for the user and can affect the health and well being of those around the user. however alcohol can have a more immediate life ending effect on the user and public where smoking takes many years to kill. Smoking has turned socially unacceptable (which is fine IMO even though I smoke I try very hard not to harm or inconvenience those who choose not

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 04-19-2010 04:28 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't see nicotine and alcohols as being somehow equal (or alcohol being worse) in terms of deadly nature. And the annual death toll really speaks to that.

Not everyone who drinks alcohol chooses to drive drunk. Not everyone who drinks alcohol gets addicted to it and becomes an alcoholic, much less a terminal alcoholic who dies of it.

I don't know the numbers on it, but I would be willing to bet there are significantly more adults in the United States who drink than smoke. Yet the medical death toll from alcohol related liver failure is only 3%-4% of the death toll from cigarettes. The reason for this is pretty simple: cigarettes are more addictive than alcohol. It's easy to drink in moderation. Most drinkers are only occasional drinkers. A person has to binge drink and do so on pretty much on a daily basis to develop a physical dependency, or addiction, to alcohol. It doesn't take nearly as much effort to get addicted to nicotine. A new smoker can be addicted to nicotine in as little as a couple of weeks of smoking regularly.

Certainly alcoholism and drunk driving are both serious problems. This weekend here in Lawton some older fellow west of town cutting the grass on his riding lawn mower was run over and killed by a 26 year old man who lost control of his vehicle. This accident happened in the middle of the day. The dude driving the car was drunk. The story was all over the news. Violent, tragic deaths are often news-worthy items. The many thousands who die of lung cancer, COPD, smoking attributed heart disease and emphysema don't make the TV newscasts. You only read about their passing in the obituary section if you look for it -or even read stuff printed on dead trees anymore.

 |  IP: Logged

Sean McKinnon
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1712
From: Peabody Massachusetts
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 04-19-2010 06:56 PM      Profile for Sean McKinnon   Author's Homepage   Email Sean McKinnon   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree that there are more persons addicted to nicotene than to alcohol but in terms of harm reduction there are more medical options for weening ones self off of nicotene than thier is for alcohol. I am sure a lot more people die from smoking related illness than alcohol related illness but more people also die in auto accidents than from handguns. Some people smoke everyday for 60 years and don't develop canver or emphysema, a lot of people drink everyday and don't get into drunk driving accidents. I just do not see differentiating between deadly addictive drugs. This country has a tendency to do just that to say one thing is ok and another is not. Remember in the 30's you could smoke anywhere you wanted anytime you wanted but having a drink of alcohol was a crime.

Also it may be easy for some to drink in moderation but if someone suffers from the disease of alcoholism it is impossible. Active alcoholics cannot choose to stop drinking once they have started the same way some people can. It is a proven medical fact. Look it up in the DSM Four.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 04-19-2010 07:01 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I do not believe that alcoholism is a disease. I'll give it "self-inflicted condition", at best. I wonder what "disease" people who are addicted to nicotine have?

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 04-19-2010 09:24 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Alcoholism isn't necessarily self-inflicted, though. For instance, genes related to enzymes involved in alcohol metabolism are linked with alcoholism tendencies.

quote: Sean McKinnon
Both nicotine and alcohol are addictive drugs that cause health problems not only to the person who chooses to use them but also can cause health problems to people around them who choose not to drink or smoke.
The problem with making such a statement is that one who is around someone who smokes is automatically affected by the smoke. The nicotine will be sent to me through the air. The same isn't true of alcohol.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 04-19-2010 10:21 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Sean McKinnon
I am sure a lot more people die from smoking related illness than alcohol related illness but more people also die in auto accidents than from handguns.
On average 17000 Americans die in alcohol related car accidents yearly, which is roughly 40% of all auto accident deaths in the United States. But that doesn't really have anything to do with 400,000 Americans dying annually of their smoking habits.

Here's an interesting statistic: 430472 deaths as of March, 2010. That toll is the sum total of all American military deaths in combat from World War I, World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War and the wars we have been fighting in the middle east over the last 20 years. That series of conflict spans almost 100 years. Yet it takes only one year for nearly as many Americans to die from a smoking habit. And when you factor in the second hand smoking deaths then smoking surpasses that combat deaths total.

quote: Sean McKinnon
I just do not see differentiating between deadly addictive drugs.
I do. Especially when the death tolls are radically different in scale.

Nicotine via cigarette use is the world's most deadly drug. It kills more people than any other drug. A lot more people. In the United States, cigarettes are the 2nd leading cause of death. Heart disease deaths from poor diet and sedentary lifestyle is the top cause. The top two causes of deaths in the US are preventable causes. But the food industry and America's tradition of camping out on its collective big butt is a broad (no pun intended) and complex problem. The issue with nicotene isn't complex. The tobacco cigarette is the specific culprit, one that is easy to attack and worthy of being attacked.

quote: Randy Stankey
As I see it now, I don't see why a person can't smoke a single cigarette, a pack of cigarettes or even a whole carton of cigarettes if he wants to. But I also don't see why a person HAS to smoke a cigarette if he doesn't want to. If he enjoys smoking, why not? But, if he is smoking just to satisfy a habit, it makes no fucking sense!
I think addictions may affect different people to varying degrees. I'm not going to call a smoker a weakling if he wants to quit smoking but cannot due to his addiction to nicotene. I've never been addicted to nicotene so I don't personally know how hard it is to quit. Based on what I've seen it sure as hell doesn't look easy.

Differences of addiction severity could lie in individual personality and will power. Body chemistry and genetics could be involved. It took my parents seeing my maternal grandfather dying of lung cancer to quit smoking and the sight of that disease process convinced them to quit cold turkey. My boss' older brother had a collapsed lung and spent a week in the hospital due to an illness stemming from his smoking habit. That guy has wanted to quit smoking ever since, but more than 10 years later he's still smoking like a chimney stack.

I've often seen comparisons of nicotene addiction being as intense as heroin addiction. That really sucks. That statistic, the death tolls and lots of other info has been commonly available for many years now. I guess the folks I would label as "weakling" or "dumb ass idiot" are the teens and other young people who start smoking now despite all the warnings.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 12 pages: 1  2  3  ...  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.