Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » "Classic" movies you hate...and why (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 7 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
 
Author Topic: "Classic" movies you hate...and why
Mike Schindler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1039
From: Oak Park, IL, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 07-02-2010 08:03 PM      Profile for Mike Schindler   Email Mike Schindler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
CITIZEN KANE's importance in history aside, it still works on its own merits. If you haven't seen it, give it a shot. It's awesome.

 |  IP: Logged

Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-02-2010 10:39 PM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Speaking of vastly over rated, Hitchcock made about 80 movies, all but a handful stilted and tedious to the point of laughability. Yeah, The Birds sucks.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 07-03-2010 08:36 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mike...by definition, a Classic movie has its fans. Thus, you need not defend it. My personal favorite movie is 2001:A Space Odyssey...others here find it a bore-fest. I can understand their reasoning. I could spend endless amounts of time trying to explain why it is so good (for me, at least)...but if you don't like it...you don't like it!

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 07-03-2010 08:57 AM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I always liked 2001 ... when it came out, there just wasn't that much 'quality' science fiction. And being a SF fan and a tech-geek, I loved it. But I admit, if you have not read the book, alot is lost.

 |  IP: Logged

Damien Taylor
Master Film Handler

Posts: 493
From: Perth, Western Australia
Registered: Apr 2007


 - posted 07-03-2010 08:05 PM      Profile for Damien Taylor   Email Damien Taylor   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree with GWTW, I can never make it past the intermission.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Schindler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1039
From: Oak Park, IL, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 07-04-2010 09:04 AM      Profile for Mike Schindler   Email Mike Schindler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve, I understand that, and I agree that 2001 is awesome. I was just pointing out to people who had not seen CITIZEN KANE that there is more to it than its groundbreaking status, and that a disinterest in that aspect of the film should not deter them from watching it.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-05-2010 08:17 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'll add another vote for GWTW. Ugh. I understand its importance in cinema history, but I really can't stand that film. Scarlet is annoying and the film is mostly a snooze-fest.

"Grease" is another one that I hate. I'm not a big fan of musicals, anyway, and every song in this is truly annoying.

Sadly, I have shown both of these.

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Garman
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: Toledo, OH USA
Registered: Mar 2003


 - posted 07-05-2010 08:39 PM      Profile for Aaron Garman   Email Aaron Garman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
An American in Paris: terribly boring and an absolutely awful ending that DOESNT MAKE SENSE!

AJG

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 07-05-2010 09:39 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Brad Miller
A Clockwork Orange - Just retarded. I could only make it 30-45 minutes into this not-funny-at-all gargantuan turd. I'm pretty sure you have to be a brain dead pothead to get the humor in this.
There's the problem right there. It's not a comedy.

 |  IP: Logged

Victor Liorentas
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 800
From: london ontario canada
Registered: May 2009


 - posted 07-05-2010 10:05 PM      Profile for Victor Liorentas   Email Victor Liorentas   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah A Clockwork Orange is deadly serious with some funny bits only!
Kubrick and his family recieved death threats over it leading to his pulling it out of circulation in England!Only since his death was this ban lifted!
Smashing film!

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 07-05-2010 10:13 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Kubrick was still warm and they already had it on the DVD shelves.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 07-05-2010 10:24 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Why would anyone get death threats over Clockwork Orange? I know the movie sucks, but threatening to kill the director is going a bit too far.

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 07-06-2010 12:08 AM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Joe Redifer
Why would anyone get death threats over Clockwork Orange? I know the movie sucks, but threatening to kill the director is going a bit too far.
Some people think the film was banned in England; it wasn't. It was given a certificate by the British Board of Film Censors, as it then was, and opened in cinemas. It was given a terrible review by probably the most famous film critic in Britain at the time. Basically he said something along the lines of it was evil, the worst film he'd ever seen, he could find nothing good to say about it, I think also something about it shouldn't have been made. This was also picked up by our self-appointed minder of sex and violence of television, some senior people within the Church of England, and by certain other newspapers. This turned into a major campaign against the film, and it was claimed that certain real-life attacks on people had been inspired by the film; whether this was true, I don't know. This was what led to threats being made against Kubrick, who decided he'd had enough, and somehow managed to have the film withdrawn from distribution here. It remained available elsewhere, and was shown somewhere almost continuously in France, where it had something of a cult following.

A few years before Kbrick's death a television programme was made which wanted to use a few short clips from the film. As far as I can remember this went to court, and there was an attempt to get an injunction to stop the programme, or at least the clips from the film, being transmitted. this eventually failed, and the programme was transmitted, with the clips. I didn't see it, so I don't know what was shown.

A few years later, while Kubrick was still alive there was talk of the film being released again, and it was indeed released on DVD; I'm not sure if it actually came out before or after Kubrick's death, but there was certainly discussion about it before. After he died it was shown in a tribute season at the National Film Theatre, and then released to other cinemas.

I bought the DVD when it came out, and this was the first time I had seen any of the film; I would have been too young to have been able to see it during its brief original release. I knew that it featured strangely-dressed young men, violence and music by Beethoven, but that was about all. When I watched it I couldn't help wondering what the fuss had been about. I didn't really like the film when I first saw it, but it's sort of grown on me having seen it a few times.

The version I saw in the US was slightly different to that which was released here. I don't know which, if either, was he same as the original release.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 07-06-2010 06:02 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Well John, of people I know who like Clockwork Orange, all of them think it is funny. Then again all of them are potheads. (Nevermind I just answered my own question.)

 |  IP: Logged

Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-06-2010 08:48 AM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Stephen Furley
The version I saw in the US was slightly different to that which was released here. I don't know which, if either, was he same as the original release.

Which is appropriate as the American version of the book is different than the British version (at least 30 years ago when I was in college). The British version had an extra chapter.

Comedy, no way. Brutal rapes rarely cause chuckles. Vicious satire of the police state vs liberal dogoodism, yeah.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 7 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.