|
|
This topic comprises 7 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
|
|
Author
|
Topic: "Classic" movies you hate...and why
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hillary Charles
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 748
From: York, PA, USA
Registered: Feb 2001
|
posted 07-09-2010 05:31 PM
Amazing? Well, maybe technically, but I much prefer "Zelig" for that kind of concept. In a good story, the hero is supposed to change from his experiences; Forrest never changes. Jenny changes too late. The only character who is redeemed is Lt. Dan, and he's peripheral.
IMO, it's about a dimwit who chances upon history, and then it's over. I was left thinking, "What's the point?" It seemed merely like an exercise in technology, and the story was crafted to serve that.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 07-10-2010 01:40 AM
In regards to 2001: A Space Odyssey:
I liked 2001 for its more plausible depiction of space travel & exploration. Many of the simple activities we take for granted on Earth are slow complicated affairs in space. Star Trek and Star Wars have a more entertaining pace but are less plausible. Sound isn't possible in a vacuum, so how is anyone going to hear a spaceship explode? There's a lot of stuff in "science fiction" movies that is pure bullshit. Roger Ebert called it on the newest Predators movie: the sun doesn't change position in the sky and large moons/planets are nearby in orbit -might look cool in a movie, but in reality that Predators planet surface would be a turbulent ocean of lava instead of a jungle. Oh well. Movies often put stuff on screen that looks cool but makes absolutely no damned sense at all when you think about it.
2001 was more relevant to the late 1960s and America's race to get to the moon during that period. People were fascinated about outer space and the possibilities of the future. Today, I don't think the topic generates nearly as much interest. A lot of dreams of the future have been crushed by the reality that any substantial progess will cost a giant fortune and take decades to complete. Many of us probably won't live long enough to see a successful mission to Mars, much less see the Moon or Mars colonized.
The recent movie, Moon has some similarities with 2001. However, its story is driven by its main character, Sam Bell, instead of the simple depiction of living/working in outer space. The movie doesn't move along at a fast pace, but it is arguably more involving because of its human focus.
As to film classics I don't like, here's a few acclaimed movies I didn't like or could not make myself appreciate/enjoy:
Intolerance - D.W. Griffith silent epic I fell asleep trying to watch a press screening of this monster in Lincoln Center's Avery Fisher Hall. A live orchestra was included in the show. Top notch presentation effort. But, damn. I was not the only one falling asleep!
Out of Africa - 1985 Oscar winner. I don't get it. I was bored. That's a movie that really feels over long.
Short Cuts This movie from Robert Altman boasts a 94% rating on Rotten Tomaotes' tomato meter. It even had some 70mm blow up prints which automatically earns good points from me. Still, I just could not get into this 3 hour long movie. I think other movies like Magnolia (which many either love or really hate) have succeeded better with this sort of approach.
Reds - couldn't get into it. Chariots of Fire - bored. and that means Raiders of the Lost Ark should have won the 1981 Best Picture Oscar.
There's lots of other positively reviewed movies I didn't really like all that much, but I haven't thought of them yet and this post is too long already. Maybe others will mention those other movies.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 7 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|