|
|
This topic comprises 9 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
|
|
Author
|
Topic: "2001:A Space Odyssey" re-issue
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 12-31-2000 08:38 PM
Mark:I agree on the easy set up of DTS over mag for the newer installations....think about it...if you have either a Simplex or Century, only the projector head need be changed if it is currently a 35mm only theatre. With Panastereo's CSP-4600, mag installation would also be a snap for existing mag set ups with CP-500s or CP-65s or Panastereo. In speaking with one of the studios that was looking into DTS and 70mm...they claimed that DTS wanted a pretty hefty premium to license the DTS format for 70mm in addition to 35mm (in addition to the negative cost for the 65mm time-code)...so much so that it would have been cheaper to strike mag prints for a small run. Steve ------------------ "Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 01-05-2001 03:38 AM
I love the way Warner Bros. keep saying that they loved Stanley Kubrick and want to do everything as he would have wanted it...For years, he kept A Clockwork Orange unavailable on video in Australia and Great Britain due to the problems on its initial release in GB and the fact that Australia uses the same video format. Now, the poor guy's still warm in his grave and guess what came out on video here about one month ago? You guessed it...A Clockwork Orange. Give it up Warners...no-one believes you.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Martin Frandsen
Master Film Handler

Posts: 270
From: Denmark, Europe
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 01-05-2001 01:57 PM
A 70mm dts release still will be much better than a 35mm release. I have never heard 2001 in mag, but i can imaging that it beats the hell out of anything out there.Anyone have any updates on releases? ------------------ Martin Frandsen Film crazy!, Big 70mm fan!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 01-07-2001 11:40 AM
I'm with John on this one, at least to the extent that folding down five screen channels in to three would be a bad idea for regular use.On the other hand, the 5->3 (and, even, 5->1!) channel conversion option would be good to have around for emergency use, in case the film in question had panned dialogue and an amp or crossover or loudspeaker were blown. Obviously, the problem would need to get fixed, but it's better to have some options for temporary use (with apologies to customers and offers of refunds) rather than to be forced to cancel shows or lose some dialogue as a result. I've always liked the way that some Dolby processors have a "bypass" mode which sends a mono signal to all three screen channels. I've never lost a center channel, but this would allow running the film in mono through the L and R screen channels if the center channel were to go south. (Not that I advocate doing any of this, but I do like to have the ability to run the film with some type of sound rather than having to cancel a show entirely.)
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 01-12-2001 11:30 AM
At the ITEA Seminar in Los Angeles this week, I asked Bill Hunter of DTS whether the original mix with five channels behind the screen could be used with DTS. He said yes, noting that DTS has been configured for many different channel configuations in "special venue" applications. Since the 70mm print only contains time code, the number and placement of channels is limited only by your imagination and budget.------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Eastman Kodak Company Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419 Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 9 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|