|
|
This topic comprises 9 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
|
|
Author
|
Topic: do you prefer DTS or Dolby ?
|
Karen Hultgren
Master Film Handler

Posts: 492
From: Agoura Hills, CA, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 02-27-2002 07:21 PM
A few more points:We will NEVER stop supporting customers with CD-ROM drives. The type of hard drive that will be used on our new player has not been finalized. When I am permitted to give you guys more info, I will (I know it's hard to wait). Copying discs? The offical DTS company line is = do not do that. Karen at DTS
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Baum
Film Handler
Posts: 90
From: Brussels, Belgium
Registered: Aug 2000
|
posted 02-28-2002 06:04 PM
hi KarenNote my comments, I fully agree with you. That test was flawed and made in panic, imho, by Dobly who saw a threat coming from the 1/2 rate DTS. Too me, the Dolby codec and its principles applied to the dvd market pose 2 serious, often recurring, problems: 1. its inherent caracteristics (bit sharing, low data rate, causing 93% of losses from the master , at 15:1 compression ratio etc) 2. unfaithfull to the original master (overall level, dialogue normalisation, which indeed DOES affect the work of the D/A converters in the reproducing chain, and downmixing, which KILLS dynamics imho ). This is an opinion more focusing on the dvd software but still, most of it can be seen in the cinema world too. Dolby is a convenient compromise (on the film print or for taking a small space on dvd). I would say DTS is to sound what Panavision-70mm is to film
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Baum
Film Handler
Posts: 90
From: Brussels, Belgium
Registered: Aug 2000
|
posted 03-01-2002 08:36 PM
Davidhi I was a bit stunned when I read your comment on dolby-dts test as what you said was exactly the opposite of what REALLY occured. (except that the full rate dts was ultimately prefered during this "blind" test run by dolby ). cheers
| IP: Logged
|
|
David Baum
Film Handler
Posts: 90
From: Brussels, Belgium
Registered: Aug 2000
|
posted 03-01-2002 08:59 PM
hi Karen  if you want to read another example of flawed opinions against dts, read this: CLICK HERE it's shocking to see the denial of the evidence (superiority of DTS) one can find over the internet. best David
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
David Baum
Film Handler
Posts: 90
From: Brussels, Belgium
Registered: Aug 2000
|
posted 03-01-2002 10:12 PM
David  hi you're definitely more knowledgeable than me. I was just surprised of your rememberance but indeed, our memories can play tricks  cheers
| IP: Logged
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 03-03-2002 03:37 AM
I hadn't had a chance to respond to John Hawkinson's negative criticism on my idea for a single DTS Server to sound an entire mulitplex.Single point of failure? Hardly. First, at least give me some kind of credit. I'm am not talking about picking up some cheapo Hewlett Packard Pavillion PC and trying to make it into a server. I seem to recall mentioning stuff like Sun and UNIX, etc. Y'know, enterprise level server stuff. Not amateur crap. If you put a good fault tolerant server in place with full RAID capability or better yet a rack mount server cluster you will have something far more reliable and even more simple in operation from an organizational standpoing than a multitude of DTS players strewn across an entire multiplex. Just look at what you have to spend per screen to outfit DTS. You're at nearly $7,000 alone for a DTS-6D unit sans integrated cinema processor. I'm pretty sure that, for under $20,000, I could put together a parallel server cluster that would be powerful enough and reliable enough to do the same duty as 24 or even 36 DTS-6D units.
| IP: Logged
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 03-03-2002 08:17 AM
Kodak's Digital Cinema Operating System envisions a central server for "Digital Done Right". "SUN Microsystems is providing the server storage and networking platform for the cinema operating system and digital projector. The operating system will support the loading, scheduling, and playback of features, trailers and other pre-show content on multiple digital screens." http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/digital/prototype.shtml http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/digital/cineOpSys.shtml ------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 9 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|