Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » do you prefer DTS or Dolby ? (Page 8)

 
This topic comprises 9 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 
 
Author Topic: do you prefer DTS or Dolby ?
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-03-2002 02:43 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Alright...Time to get this thread back on topic....

"do you prefer DTS or Dolby?"

The answer is easy....

THX

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-03-2002 11:31 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bobby,
I'm quite familiar with serious enterprise servers. And I still realize that like anything, you want to be able to take them down for maintenance, and even if you have dual redundant power supplies and generators and all that stuff that you're not going to have in a cinema venue, you're still never 100% reliable. Somewhere there's a trade-off between fewer parts to maintain and fewer points of failure, but it's not always clear what it is in a given application
Sometimes I think this is not a lesson a lot of sysadmins have properly learned. People like to run big monolithic fileservers, but eventually those systems fail; and users become unhappy. Around here, we have a distributed set of 23 fileservers for our main computing environment, instead of a few monolithic ones. It really comes in handy for a wide variety of reasons. And sure, they still have RAIDs, etc.
So I think you're saying that the big PRO here is that you don't have to pay for n DTS-6D units, but intead get a single Big DTS Box that can handle n screens, and you think that the hardware cost will be cheaper? I suppose it all depends on what tradeoffs you make. Let's say we're looking at 24 screens (though that seems high). I presume you're not going to have 48 (or even 72) CD drives in the BDB (Big DTS Box), so you're not going to be able to handle 24 different features with 24 individual sets of DTS discs that all arrive at the same time. OK, that's probably fine, since that's not a likely scenario anyhow. But as for the rest, you need to duplicate the automation logic, and the DTS decoding logic (be it hardware or software), and the timecode reading logic. About all you save on is the chassis and CDROM drive costs. I suspect those are not a large fraction of the sticker price of a DTS-6D.
I guess you save on space (do people really feel like there's not enough space in a rack at a given screen for a DTS 6D?). You have more complex routing to deal with (what if your booths are spread out? How do you get the timecode to the BDB?). Sure, this is not a killer issue, but neither is the Pro a killer Pro.
It still seems to me that this is not a very big win. But again, maybe I'm missing some of your advantages?
Oh, and of course, DTS would have to rewrite their software. I'm sure that everyone loves DOS as a software platform and the DTS engineers would be sorely disappointed at the requirement to migrate to a real toolchain (just kidding), but they could move to UNIX without changing the current hardware platform, too.
I also haven't seen a single huge monolithic server of the kind we're discussing that can run day-to-day without anyone administering it. Perhaps I just haven't seen it, but the closest thing that comes to mind are Network Appliance "NFS toaster" boxes, and they still need someone to care for them. Do you expect every theatre to have a sysadmin? Or DTS to dial in and remotely administer the box over the Internet or a POTS lines?
I've gotta say, most of these things scare me.

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Williams
Master Film Handler

Posts: 255
From: Knoxville, TN
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-04-2002 07:44 AM      Profile for Mike Williams   Email Mike Williams   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Let me go back to my original post about a centralized server and tell you why it would work. First off, you don't remove the drives from the players. You ADD a network card to the player. This would have the ability to play soundtracks kept on the server.. as well as the drives.
The network could even be set up to be peer-to-peer.. For example at the theater I am at, we have 7 screens and all have 2 drive units. That means a two disc movie gets mostly analog trailers. If there was a central server, or some peer-to-peer setup, one trailer disc could work on all of the screens. You could even interlock without copying a new set of discs.
Not to mention down the line, using this architecture, you can just get rid of the discs by having DTS or the studio upload the soundtracks to the theater server.
I am suprised the studios haven't been pushing for this already.. Two major benefits leap out right away for them:
1 - Their trailers will get played digitally
2 - They could potentially track how often their movie is played and on what screen (depending on how you write the software).


 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-04-2002 08:57 AM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Now the picture gets more cloudy, 'cause different people want different things. It does seem to me that, architecturally speaking, adding network cards to DTS boxes would be a better solution than a large central server (like I said on 25th, "You can acheive that by building a LAN between the individual DTS players.").

But I think Bobby was trying to attain some cost savings, which aren't in that picture anymore.

In the down-to-earth realm, I have a suspicion that adding network support would involve serious software changes on the DTS side, since they would have to be a lot more interrupt-driven than they are right now. I don't think they'd have to convert to a realtime OS, but maybe...

As for trailers in digital...over here, at the beginning of each academic term (the unit by which we set our schedules), I go through all of our DTS trailer discs and pull down the term's trailers and burn them onto a CDR. I will admit that a few times I have considered replacing the C drive of the DTS-6D with a SCSI drive, perhaps a SCSI drive connected to two different SCSI busses so I could just update the set of trailers remotely. I don't see why the DTS-6D would notice the difference between a CDROM and a hard drive...and even if it did, it could probably be whacked into behaving. Still, the annoyance of burning trailer CDs hasn't really become high enough. Anyhow, if anyone cares to look, feel free to play with my software; of course it only runs under Unix...

--jhawk


 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-04-2002 09:53 PM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John...this is interesting, because our trailer programs never seem to coincide with what's on the current disc.

But...I'm a Mac person...is there some way to make a trailer disc on a Mac?

For instance, could I do it with Toast?

I realize that might be an incredibly stupid question, but please don't laugh...I'd really like to get into this, but I'm just clueless when it comes to any other operating system.

Do you (or does anybody) know if I could run Unix on my Mac?

------------------
And, hey! Let's be careful out there.

~Manny.


 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 03-04-2002 11:10 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The vision I see for a DTS audio server is not something pigged with 48 or 72 CD drives. Rather, the audio would run from RAID discs themselves. The server can have some CD/DVD drives to offload data, as well as other drive formats. But SCSI RAID hard discs are going to feed large amounts of data in a more consistent fashion than any optical disc drive. If a Pluto server can be rigged to play back an awesome amount of audio/video for a DLP show, it would stand to reason that running audio streams from a DTS server would be fairly easy.

Certainly DTS would have to rewrite their software. And I mean all of it right down to the encoding scheme. DTS will certainly have to do it if they intend to improve their cinema system past the old APT-X100 encoding format to something that could handle 10.2 Surround or 24/96 audio. The standard DTS-6/6D/6AD model design would not integrate into a networked scheme involving an audio server. About the only thing that would remain at all is the time code readers. And there are better ways than RS-232 serial cables for feeding time code data. In rewriting software, DTS would have to configure a server for straightforward, simple operation.

Now you might say that simple operation is impossible for any UNIX driven computer system. My opinion is that computer systems get much more difficult to maintain when they are trying to serve more than one purpose. It is just like the poor Windows user that loads every piece of software he ever saw onto the machine and then wonders why it crashes all the time. If the computer is given only one simple job, it will hardly fail unless there is a hardware failure involved. For instance, I've been configuring computers to run outdoor electronic message centers. They're just running plain old Windoze98, but since the user is unable to load any other software onto the machine other than the OS and the sign controller software the machines don't crap out. Hardware failures are always a threat, but that situation is not really different with a theater setup of many DTS players all hooked into one power junction box. Nothing is 100% foolproof but I think the audio server idea would save a lot of money, at least for large multiplexes.

To respond to Manny's question about making a DTS trailers disc on a Mac, would that be just making a binary dub of an existing disc or mastering a completely new one? I haven't played around with Toast on a Mac, but I would be shocked if it did not have a way to make bit for bit binary copies of CDs. The matter of mastering your own audio for a DTS trailers CD would require an APT-X100 encoder among other things, and I think DTS is the only game in town for that.

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-04-2002 11:42 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bobby, I believe Manny was asking about doing the equivalent of my software on a Mac -- not copying trailer discs, but mixing and matching trailers from one disc onto another, so you can play trailers from 3 or 4 discs simultaneously.

I haven't used Toast, but I'm pretty sure that, by itself, it is insufficient. The deal here is that all the trailers are stored in one monolithic file along with an index file, and you need to consult the index file to get the offsets within the monolithic file to pull out an individual trailer. And then to make a disc, you construct a new monolithic file and index file with only the trailers you want. So while I'm sure Toast can burn the new disc, it's not going to help you with the construction and maintenance of the monolithic file and the index file, which are DTS custom. The index file is plain ASCII though, and totally decypherable. The monolithic file isn't, but you don't need to decode it -- just honor the offsets from the index.

But don't despair, Manny -- do you have Mac OS X? It's unix on the inside, so you should just be able to download my software (just shell and awk scripts) and use it from a Terminal window. Why don't you give it a try? I suspect it might need a little bit of adjustment, but nothing serious. If you can't make it work, I'll go and sit down in front of a Mac and see what I can do. I suspect you can just replace the "cdrecord" step in my instructions with Toast (it'll burn iso9660 CDs, right?).

Bobby, about your Big DTS Box, really all I can say is "complex systems fail." Architect the system in the simplest way possible if you can get away with it. I don't know what you propose instead RS-232 for timecode data. Probably not RS-422, though it might be a better choice. 10mbps ethernet? Well, suddenly the world just got a lot more complicated and the timecode reader did too. DHCP for timecode readers? IP address conflicts? Eww. Yes, it's probably easier to extend to longer distances if you know how to build an ethernet network, which is more and more commonplace, but still probably not par for the course for today's theatre tech (but for tomorrow's, sure). And then you need to move the audio signals back from the BDB to your cinema processor (unless that's included in this box) and to your amplifiers. That could be problematic if its a long run. But I guess you can go optical...

I'm still not buying the money-saving factor though (I hear the coolness factor, it's true). I suppose they could do a lot in terms of saving board space and using fancier logic and FPGAs and so-on to get a lot better density on their codec, even if it stays in hardware, but it still needs to be able to supply the raw bit density per unit time that the standalone DTS unit does, and I suspect that the hardware cost savings for that centralization is just that high. But again, we don't really understand the internal economics of the DTS-6D (at least, I don't).
Also, if DTS redesigns their codecs, they're going to need to have a single-screen box anyway, since not everyone is going to be a huge multiplex. If so, they're still stuck maintaining two parallel kinds of systems (not to mention their support commitment of never desupporting CDROM users...).

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-06-2002 04:06 PM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John:

I am using Mac OS X and I downloaded your software. The code opens as a text file. Maybe I'm doing this wrong, but I can't just copy it over to the Terminal window...well, I can copy it over, but nothing happens,

What am I supposed to do to run the program?

Do I need to know a whole lot about UNIX to make this work? Should I buy a book? Or can I make this work by just learning a few codes/keystroke sequences?

------------------
And, hey! Let's be careful out there.

~Manny.


 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-07-2002 02:03 AM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Manny,

Sorry I should probably have given you a few more details. You certainly don't need to be familiar with Unix, but it would certainly help to figure some stuff out. It's probably a good idea to get a book. I'm afraid I can't recommend one, I've been a Unix user for the past 10 years and didn't learn with a book... Anyhow, once you figure out how to do it, it should be straightforward.
I sat down with a G3 with MacOS X, and it was behaving extremely strangely with a DTS disc in the drive. Sometimes I could ls -l /Volumes/cd9660 and see the contents, and sometimes I couldn't. I suspect there's omething wrong with that G3.
In any case, I made some slight edits to my script so it is more likely to work correctly under MacOS X. Anyhow, how to use:
Download the script (dtsgrab) to a file.
In the Terminal window, cd to the directory you saved it in. If you saved it on the desktop, that would be "cd ~/Desktop."
Make it executable. "chmod a+x dtsgrab".
Stick a DTS disc in the drive. Type "mount" to make sure it is mounted, probably on /Volumes/cd9660. If it's elsewhere, you'll need to edit "dtsgrab" before running it.
Execute the script: "./dtsgrab"
It will prompt you, hopefully it will be sufficiently self-explanatory. If you still can't get anywhere, I'll hunt around and find a MacOS X machine that actually works and/or a MacOS X expert to tell me what stupid thing I'm doing wrong....

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-07-2002 09:03 PM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hmm...

At least I got the program running...but I think there is a glitch somewhere. An error message involved the expression "*.cat" or something like that.

The list of trailers showed up, but I couldn't figure out what I was supposed to do in terms of editing the list. For instance, my "delete" key gets an error message and Ctrl-X (aka "Cut") doesn't work either.

Also...there was no prompt following the list. Is that normal for this?

While it certainly would be neat to use this app, I have no idea what you'd have to do to make it work on a Mac. Just let me know if it's going to put you out of your way at all and I'll find something else to fixate on.

------------------
And, hey! Let's be careful out there.

~Manny.

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-07-2002 09:40 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Manny and I are going to take this up offline in email.
We'll report back.

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 07-01-2002 12:47 AM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bumping this up for Adam Wilbert (specifically for my 03-04-2002 08:57 AM post on page 8).

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 07-01-2002 02:22 AM      Profile for Paul G. Thompson   Email Paul G. Thompson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
<print> - if I have enough ink.

Oh, POOP! The printer jammed.


 |  IP: Logged

Jamie Sanson
Film Handler

Posts: 33
From: Port Macquarie,NSW, Australia
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 07-03-2002 06:33 AM      Profile for Jamie Sanson   Email Jamie Sanson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
AND THE WINNER IS (drum roll please) ~~DTS~~!



 |  IP: Logged

David Whitbeck
Film Handler

Posts: 70
From: Tempe, AZ
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 07-03-2002 04:31 PM      Profile for David Whitbeck   Email David Whitbeck   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No way, Dolby Digital is definitely the best.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 9 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.