Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » do you prefer DTS or Dolby ? (Page 9)

 
This topic comprises 9 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 
 
Author Topic: do you prefer DTS or Dolby ?
John Scott
Master Film Handler

Posts: 252
From: Oakdale, MN, USA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 07-03-2002 05:18 PM      Profile for John Scott   Email John Scott   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For practicality sake, I prefer DD (sorry Karen). 99.9% of all prints and trailers (including PSA's) are encoded with DD. Secondly as a manager, its more fool-proof in the booth as the kids seem to forget to put in the discs, switch the discs, change the trailer disc, etc.

Add on top of that, our company's policy trailer is only encoded in DD.

For sound sake and promotional support, I prefer DTS (nothing is worse than hearing a changeover go through the projector) though.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-03-2002 05:44 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
SR-D shouldn't fault at changeovers or reel splices. I've never run a changeover booth with SR-D, so I don't know what would cause it to fault in this case (though there's an issue with poorly timed changeovers), but the only time I've heard an otherwise good SR-D track fault at a splice has been when the theatre used opaque or zebra tape.

Use clear splicing tape and SR-D will be fine. SDDS should be, too, but I've heard a number of lab-new prints fault at good splices made with clear tape when played in SDDS.

I agree, though, that DTS will hold up better over time as prints deteriorate due to poor handling, as long as the late-run houses get the disks with the prints (or can obtain them later).

 |  IP: Logged

Jamie Sanson
Film Handler

Posts: 33
From: Port Macquarie,NSW, Australia
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 07-03-2002 08:21 PM      Profile for Jamie Sanson   Email Jamie Sanson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
.......No way, Dolby Digital is definitely the best......

David in which way? 1 Convenience (it is that)
2 Or better sound (it's not that)

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 07-04-2002 06:03 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm kind of sorry I bumped this up--I only wanted to do so for purposes of citation, not to renew the flamefest

Would it be possible for people to refrain from "Foo is the BEST!" and stick with "Foo is better because of bar!"?

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 9 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.