Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Union Projectionists (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 40 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  ...  38  39  40 
 
Author Topic: Union Projectionists
Carmine Occhino
Film Handler

Posts: 27
From: New york city
Registered: May 2003


 - posted 09-17-2003 04:20 AM      Profile for Carmine Occhino   Email Carmine Occhino   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John Pena,
If you are looking to become a union projectionist and work in New York city I would first obtain a Motion Picture Operator license (I don't know if NJ requires one). Since you have been working for a while in the booth the test should not be a problem. As far as I know (based on my attempt) the union does not give a test to enter. It is more complicated than that. I don't think any union members would want to take you as an apprenctice because as someone said in this thread the union jobs are dwindling. One union member once offered the suggestion of volunteering with the union staff or something like that to gain conacts . Good luck

 |  IP: Logged

Martin Brooks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 900
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 09-17-2003 11:43 AM      Profile for Martin Brooks   Author's Homepage   Email Martin Brooks   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
What's the cost of living like in Chicago? I can easily see $27+/hour in the big houses and screening rooms in NYC (assuming that the operators are highly competent), but I wouldn't expect it to be common elsewhere. The small-town theatres could never afford anywhere near that, and the cost of living wouldn't justify it.

I'd be amazed if there's any regular commercial theatre (union or not) in Massachusetts that pays $20/hour or more.

How can you say that when you live in Boston, an incredibly expensive place to live. Are you living with your parents? <g>

$20 an hour is $41,600 a year if you work 52 weeks a year, 40 hours a week. In many States that will give you about $30K after taxes. Can one buy a house or co-op/condo apartment within the city limits of Boston for under $300K? A $200K mortgage will take about $17K of that $30K right off the bat.

How many kids do you think you can send to a decent college when one earns only $41,600 a year?

If a movie theater, especially a multiplex, can't afford to pay a projectionist $20 an hour, then let them close (IMO). People need to be in a union in order to earn $2 per hour per screen? How cheap can they get?

 |  IP: Logged

Dennis M Dow Jr
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 141
From: Bloomfield NJ USA
Registered: Oct 2003


 - posted 10-25-2003 08:48 PM      Profile for Dennis M Dow Jr   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John
$27/hr was probably the Union Square theater in NYC. Most theaters in NYC that still have union operators are $25/hr going downwards depending on how many screens.
The test he was talking about was for your Projection license which was a requirement of NYC in the past... Not sure anymore with the amount of managers running the smaller booth (sharing 6 and running 4 and under).
The Local I am in in Northern NJ is $17/hr with 6%vacation for a 14-plex.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Perju
Film Handler

Posts: 90
From: Toronto, Canada
Registered: Nov 2002


 - posted 10-26-2003 12:32 AM      Profile for Mike Perju   Email Mike Perju   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here in Ontario, there was a massive lockout for IATSE 173 in 1996, and it's been downhill ever since. AMC does not use the Union, Famous Players and Cineplex Odeon do not either for theaters 10 screens and under, so if you want to get $10/hr (Canadian $$!)to run 11 to 18 screens, you can help yourself. However many have left (250 members in 1996, now about 25 or so). Obviously, projection alone will not pay the bills so practically everybody gets whatever job they can. The only jobs that use Union guys are single screen repertoire theaters which pay about $13/hr, but there are only seven of these theaters in town. The best source of income seems to be the Toronto International Film Festival, which pays around $23 for a single screen venue, $26 if you're manning 2 theaters in a venue, and about $29 for a premiere gala single screen venue. There are some other odd jobs, like the Universal Studios screening room (pay hovers at $20/hr), the Royal Ontario Museum theater $22/hr, York University screening room $??, and potentially Unionized new Jewish Community Centre Screening Room. That's it.

 |  IP: Logged

Ron Lacheur
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 650
From: British Columbia, Canada
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 10-26-2003 01:06 AM      Profile for Ron Lacheur   Email Ron Lacheur   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Same thing here in Vancouver. Their lockout happened in December of 1998 and just destroyed the union. Few members still remain but I'm not sure on the numbers.

10 screens and under are non-union? I thought it was 6 and under?

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-26-2003 05:30 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Back in the heydays of Local 110 in Chicago the downtown operators made 78.60 per hour. Operators wages were based on admission price then. With the Cineplex and GC lockouts back in the early 90's its amazing that very much of local 110 remains today but chains like Marcus and Crown have signed up with them and they keep going. Back in the 80's, of the 400 or so members they only had a handful of competant operators whom were designated to important locations. Hopefully things have improved today.
Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Robert E. Allen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1078
From: Checotah, Oklahoma
Registered: Jul 2002


 - posted 10-26-2003 07:18 PM      Profile for Robert E. Allen   Email Robert E. Allen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"Does anyone have any suggestions about how I can contact a theatre in reguards to a union job?"

John:

Last I knew if it's a union house that means the theatre has a contract with the I.A. to supply projectionists. So you would apply to the local union not the theatre.

 |  IP: Logged

Dan Lyons
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 698
From: Seal Beach, CA
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 10-27-2003 12:50 AM      Profile for Dan Lyons   Email Dan Lyons   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
$78????!!!! [Eek!]

Was that a typo Mark? I can't imagine any reason for that type of pay.

Danny

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-27-2003 12:53 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
For $78/hour, I will provide the theater with "projection insurance" that nothing, absolutely NOTHING will go wrong with the show...or I pay for the refunds of box office and concession.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-27-2003 08:14 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No, thats not a typo! That particuluar union also had the highest paid union official in the country as well. Donno if they still do though.......
Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Gerard S. Cohen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 975
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 10-27-2003 01:11 PM      Profile for Gerard S. Cohen   Email Gerard S. Cohen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
With union contracts, you must become aware of the number of hours per week, overtime, etc., in addition to the hourly base pay.

Usually, as the hourly base rate increases, the number of working hours decreases, so that workers' pay does not have quite the extremes you might suppose.

My highest projectionists pay was $34 per hour regular, for a 24 hour week, which I worked in two consecutive days from the replacement list. But on my last steady job I was working a single screen 33 hours per week regular, at $16.53 per hour.

As wages declined, the number of hours often increased.

Today's news is that wages in the USA have begun to climb, but at the cost of widespread unimployment.

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Hill
I love my cootie bug

Posts: 7595
From: Hollywood, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 10-27-2003 01:13 PM      Profile for Phil Hill   Email Phil Hill       Edit/Delete Post 
Danny said:
quote:
I can't imagine any reason for that type of pay.

I have paid more than that for professional services. Ummm... NO Brad! NOT ***that*** type of service!

>>> Phil

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-27-2003 01:24 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually that was booth cost not what the operator is payed
boothcost is the hourly rate paid to usually several people

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-27-2003 05:40 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Gord,
That was the hourly pay to the operator....not the "Booth Cost". I once had a Local 110 ducument that I found in a rewind table drawer in an ex-union house. It had all the operator hourly wages on it. Retirement and other benefits were in addition to that. Most Chicago operators were paid in the vicinity of 16.80 per hour though. Others went up into the 20's. The highest paying jobs were always at the "Downtown" Chicago houses none of which exist any longer. When I was invited into Local 110 years ago I was told not to worry about the super high dues I had to pay. I would be put in a downtown house for a long enough period to be able to save up the dough.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Nathan Guerriero
Film Handler

Posts: 43
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: Apr 2002


 - posted 10-30-2003 01:21 AM      Profile for Nathan Guerriero   Email Nathan Guerriero   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
1) The cost of living in Chicago is extremely high, especially in any neighborhood in which you would actually want to live. I pay 1100 for a small one bedroom in Lincoln Park (land of the upwardly mobile), but I accept this as premium for living one block from my theatre. It is not as bad as say, Manhattan, but when a deeded parking space costs $45,000, things are pretty bad.

2) I worked several years with Loews Cineplex in Chicago before taking my current position at the Biograph Theatre, and had mixed experiences with the Local 110 operators. I worked with some who were very good, some who were very bad, and one who inexplicably referred to only as "Hathaway."

I've heard many stories similar to Mark's about the good old days of the Chicago union. The owner of the 3 Penny Cinema across the street from the Biograph tells stories about the days when he was forced to employ 2 operators for his one screen (one operator per projector, I can only assume). Only one would show up at any given time, though he still had to pay for two. I understand that time and the stress of running an independent theatre in Chicago could certainly have exaggerated this story, but it's still kind of interesting.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 40 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  ...  38  39  40 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.