Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Technicolor to stop using reel bands (Page 5)

 
This topic comprises 8 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8 
 
Author Topic: Technicolor to stop using reel bands
Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 06-21-2004 08:39 AM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
FPC also sells vented polypropylene cans:
John, I have several of those and like them a lot.

 |  IP: Logged

Thomas Procyk
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1842
From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 06-21-2004 11:11 AM      Profile for Thomas Procyk   Email Thomas Procyk   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, I've got both sides of the coin:

Got a print of "Dogville" from TES without reel bands, and the "Integrity INSPECTED" (not Checked, as some people have asserted) stickers stuck a few inches from the end of the leader. The leader was held down with the same tape they taped the reel bands to it with.

On the other hand, I got a print of "Jersey Girl" from ETS now that Miramax had switched. This one DID have the Technicolor reel bands, except one of them had fallen off, and the leader of Reel 4 was wrapped all around reels 5 and 6. The string for Reel 1 was wound tightly around the core and had to be ripped off. Reel 2 had no string and was just taped back on. Good riddance to these things. They're stupid and they protect the film just like airport security protects passengers. All an illusion.

That said, I have many of these now RARE and OUT OF PRINT reel bands which are sure to become COLLECTORS ITEMS since they have been DISCONTINUED!! [Eek!] -- $1 each. Supplies limited [Wink]

=TMP=

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Budweg
Film Handler

Posts: 22
From: Lorain, Ohio, USA
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 06-21-2004 06:14 PM      Profile for Adam Budweg   Email Adam Budweg   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Im happy. One of them never fails to lose its little fastener when taking them apart.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 06-21-2004 07:22 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah, I was actually thinking of saving a few to put on eBay just to see what happens. Make sure they say the name of a movie. Actual Hollywood stuff! Wow.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Scott
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1300
From: Minneapolis, MN
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 06-22-2004 08:05 AM      Profile for Steve Scott   Email Steve Scott   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My boss freaks out if anybody throws away the reel bands. He used to call them "The Safety Film" [Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-22-2004 11:23 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dominic: Since we were talking about cans for 2000-foot rolls or less, I was of course referring to the metal cans Kodak uses for packaging camera, intermediate, sound negative, etc., films.

Vacuum packaging like Kodak uses for print stock is an excellent way to protect the film roll, but cannot be reused.

 |  IP: Logged

Matt Hefright
Film Handler

Posts: 28
From: none
Registered: Jun 2004


 - posted 06-22-2004 01:05 PM      Profile for Matt Hefright     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
personally i'm glad to see the reel bands go. most of the reels were banded properly, however someone at the banding facility always seemed to wrap the string around the core of one of the reels making it virtually impossible to remove that band properly.

as to the change in dts cases there was a vote as to what method of transportation we preferred. i guess the dvd case won out. now if we can get ETS to stop shipping the big grey box.

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Fuentes
Mmmm, Dr. Pepper!

Posts: 1168
From: Corpus Christi, TX United States
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 06-22-2004 01:08 PM      Profile for Jeremy Fuentes   Email Jeremy Fuentes   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Matt Hefright
now if we can get ETS to stop shipping the big grey box.

I second and third that. Did they think it was going to be more convenient like that? Or maybe they thought that we could just send it up an elevator and not have to carry it. NEWSFLASH: Not everyone has elevators!

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-22-2004 02:00 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I fourth the anti-grey-box comments.

The cardboard boxes wouldn't be so bad if they held 3-4 reels each. Then, one could carry a somewhat balanced load (one in each hand). The 7-reel-box is just way too big and unweildy to be easy to carry for any distance.

I've been at places where films had to be carried between buildings (a few hundred yards). I don't know how I would do this with one of those boxes.

 |  IP: Logged

Carl Martin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1424
From: Oakland, CA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 06-22-2004 04:22 PM      Profile for Carl Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Carl Martin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
hey, at least the grey boxes are lightweight and have a marginally more comfortable handle. 2 smaller boxes would be preferable. speaking of which, whatever did happen to these bad boys? i only ever had one film come in those. i liked them.

carl

 |  IP: Logged

Juan Angel Linarez
Film Handler

Posts: 5
From: Riverbank, CA , USA
Registered: May 2004


 - posted 06-22-2004 05:40 PM      Profile for Juan Angel Linarez   Author's Homepage   Email Juan Angel Linarez   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well personally I couldent be happier. I hated those annoying reel bands. I mean if they would have been made of better quality material, then maybe i would have dealt with them. By the time it was time to breakdown, you had to worry about putting those annoying bands that half of the time you had to put tape anyways becasue the string would be happy to come off.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Enos
Film God

Posts: 2081
From: Richmond, Virginia, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 06-22-2004 07:37 PM      Profile for Bill Enos   Email Bill Enos   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Likewise on the big gray box. Cut the size in half and it would be great. Going up is hell but I've found that placing the box on its side will allow it to slide gently down 2 of the 3 carpeted flights. The box is long enough to span the steps so it barely bumps. It has been tempting occasionally to take them another 10 steps up to the roof and give 'em the express to the sidewalk.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-22-2004 08:46 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Those gray boxes suck no matter what size they are, because of the flaps which get in the way, especially in a small both. We got one not too long ago which had no handle at all. I severely mistreated it and taped the crap out of it on return, hopefully mucking it up enough to have it taken out of service.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Hipp
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1462
From: Mesquite, Tx (east of Dallas)
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 07-10-2004 01:20 AM      Profile for Chris Hipp   Email Chris Hipp   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, looks like my position has changed on the reel bands. For the past three weeks, every technicolor print that I have built up have had at least two reels that the heads came loose during shipping. As annoying as I thought the bands were, I wish they would start using them again.

 |  IP: Logged

Dustin Mitchell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1865
From: Mondovi, WI, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 07-10-2004 01:46 AM      Profile for Dustin Mitchell   Email Dustin Mitchell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, so far I have not been impressed with the new system.

Hint to TES: Copy whatever ETS is doing. They're prints never come from the depot with unsecured heads/tails.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 8 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.