|
|
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Building Prints Questions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99
|
posted 07-08-2004 11:16 AM
Jack Roe tape can be had through Jack Roe or by requesting it from your dealer.
Any tape currently being sent out under CPI should be thrown back at your dealer. Their tape will undoubtedly change every few months as each manufacturer gets burned (they don't pay their bills) and they move on to another.
Re: clear tape Neumade/Splycemar tape is the best hands down. Anyone disagreeing is wrong, including Christopher Seo. Jack Roe is my second and only other choice, but the last batch I got had bad slitting and the 4 horizontal lines on screen from it were obnoxious, so it had to be reserved for trailer splicing. There is still the issue of residue after peeling a little bit, but it's not too bad. Never, ever residue when using Neumade/Splycemar.
Re: zebra tape First off, anyone using this needs to learn how to break down a print properly. However for those who just insist on using marked tape, the T-Stripe from Jack Roe can't be beat. Neumade/Splycemar is my second choice in this department. Expect some residue from both.
Re: opaque tape Anyone using opaque tape needs to be fired from their job, then taken out back and shot in the head at close range because they are stupid and lazy. For those wishing death upon themselves in this manner (we will be sending out crews to do the dirty work), does it really matter what kind of tape you use? After all, you and your presentation suck royally anyway, so there's little doubt you are putting forth any effort to take care of the prints.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Procyk
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1842
From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 07-09-2004 11:29 AM
What about Neumade "Cherry" or "Hot Pink" or whatever they call it tape? It's the tape with the clear center, no T-stripe, and only two thin red stripes on the SDDS track edges. (Maybe the SRD too, I dunno) We used to use this back in the day at the 18-screen, and I get some used prints with it left on sometimes nowadays.
It comes off as easy as the Neumade Clear stuff, quick and easy, doesn't leave residue and the red lines don't stay behind. I think they're printed on the outer surface, not the adhesive side.
I agree, the yellow "zebra" tape is a mess. I get prints with the heads and tails spliced on with this stuff (yeah, I know, at least they're splicesd) and if they spliced in a hurry, you have a vertical yellow line going through the image or the soundtrack, and it's time to bust out the F-G!
=TMP=
| IP: Logged
|
|
Jannette McQueen
Film Handler
Posts: 50
From: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Registered: Sep 2003
|
posted 12-09-2004 11:24 AM
quote: Posted by Josh Kirkhart: 4. A one-sided splice over a cue is fine and in good practice. It makes it easier to identify in breakdown/build-up for removal. In cases of Barcoded cues a splice under the cue is easier to remove as it is less widely used. As far as cues coming off, never seen it or had it happen, at worst you replace it.
Is this the consensus on the splice tape over the cue question? I had been wondering about this recently as well. The theater I'm currently at, has been making their cues this way for some time, and I had no reason to question it until last week I ran into a brain wrap because the splice tape over the cue had partially peeled off. I'll admit it's possible that I was partly responsible for the tape peeling off, if, when I replaced a non-working cue, the tape hadn't been entirely stuck down properly. But I still questioned why we needed the extra layer on the film. My thought is, it's cue *tape*, it *is* supposed to stick to the film, no? My colleague's reasoning for the extra tape is so that the cue doesn't peel off and adhere to another part of the film. But you said you'd never heard of that happening. He said he'd rather be alerted to the fact that there's enough stress being put to the film to rip off the cue, rather than just have cues mysteriously move.
I used to work at a second-run theater, and was used to dealing with "new" prints where the old cues had not been removed. Only rarely did I ever see a cue taped on in this manner. *Is* it more common than I realize?
EDIT: and I don't recall ever having any trouble finding a cue without the tape over it. In fact, when breaking down a print, that leaves you to remove a piece of tape in addition to the cue itself.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|