Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Hey you, you suck! (AKA: Outing bad film handlers) Part 2 (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 51 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  ...  49  50  51 
 
Author Topic: Hey you, you suck! (AKA: Outing bad film handlers) Part 2
Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 11-01-2006 12:50 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
That's what they are talking about Randy, just with vertical MUTs.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 11-01-2006 03:33 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Okey, Steve and Brad, I can agree with that. Thx anywho - Monte

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-01-2006 10:21 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So, then, we're saying, "I hate it when people don't twist the film the right way." ??

I can see how, when breaking down, it would be easy for a greenhorn to forget (or not know better) and twist the film any which-way when breaking down, thus creating a random wind orientation between every reel of the print. But, I see that as rather minor... sorry.

Sure. If your projector is finicky about the way the film is/has been wound it would make a difference. If your booth setup dictates the use of one orientation over another it makes a difference. If you are a stickler about doing things a certain way it makes a difference. But, over the long haul, haven't we agreed that the answer to the question of winding orientation is, "Your Mileage May Vary." ??

The one caveat being that some MUTs risk damage to the film if it isn't routed through the rollers the right way, but for personal preference, there isn't much difference at all. Is there?

Except for the fact that the table is too small to work on and that there are casters on only one end, I actually LIKE my Strong/Potts MUT.

I guess what I'm saying is, "I'm sorry. I don't get it."
No matter which way the film is shipped to me, I can get it onto the platter in the final orientation I choose simply bey twisting the film one way or the other. No matter what way the film is oriented on the platter I can get it onto the shipping reels in the way I choose, also, by twisting the film.

It doesn't matter which way the mandrel spins. Does it?

 |  IP: Logged

Charles Greenlee
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 801
From: Savannah, Ga, U.S.
Registered: Jun 2006


 - posted 11-02-2006 07:33 PM      Profile for Charles Greenlee   Author's Homepage   Email Charles Greenlee   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Likewise, we have a DM (Strong) MUT, and it doesn't metter to me whether it's emulsion in or out. I just hate it when I get mixed heads/tails. Either make them all heads or all tails. However, now that I'm at Regal, we build from the shipping reels to the 6k reels, and then dump from them to the platter, so once again even if there were a problem with emulsion in/out, it's surely be solved at the build table, and the MUT wouldn't know the difference. Personally, when I break down, I always break down with the soundtrack up, and with heads out, all of them, even if they were mixed coming in. If you receive a print from me, and it's not your preferred format, sorry, at least the reels will be consistant for you.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 11-03-2006 12:48 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Brad Miller
who resplice (or even worse, masking tape) the leaders back on with the soundtrack flipped.

 - (lol) .. This is to support Brad's comment above and where I can obviously tell that there are some clowns out there who DO NOT know how to wind film using a Christie MK35 MUT - being this is the end with the tail leader ACTUALLY was wound Edison style on the reel, but the film being flipped.

 |  IP: Logged

Ross Oba
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 181
From: Kailua Kona, HI
Registered: Oct 2005


 - posted 11-03-2006 01:45 AM      Profile for Ross Oba   Email Ross Oba   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I am the only one at my theater that does a one-sided splice when breaking down prints. But I have never seen anyone use the original splice tape from the splice to attach the heads and tails together.

 |  IP: Logged

Alex Grueneberg
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 125
From: Chicago, IL
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted 11-03-2006 05:14 AM      Profile for Alex Grueneberg   Author's Homepage   Email Alex Grueneberg   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Same here. I keep trying to get the other operators to use the splicer, but they just don't see why it matters and say "it wastes splice tape".

That’s a really lame reason as I keep about 15 rolls minimum on hand. I don’t care how much we use. There’s a new booth head in town, and things are going to change. At least I got them to stop throwing out headers and tails... [Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

Luci Reeve
Film Handler

Posts: 50
From: Telluride, CO, USA
Registered: Feb 2006


 - posted 11-04-2006 05:42 PM      Profile for Luci Reeve   Author's Homepage   Email Luci Reeve   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Print #3355 of The Departed arrived with Reel 1 so full it was masking taped around the sides to keep the film on the reel! When I rewound it I found six or seven previews added to it which was what made it so full. It's hard to complain about getting all those lovely previews but sheesh!

It has been months since I've gotten a film that didn't have the heads and tails masking taped - unfortunately it just seems normal somehow. The good things is that recently the incidence of bad scratches seems to be lessening.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Croaro
Master Film Handler

Posts: 394
From: Millbrae, CA
Registered: Apr 2005


 - posted 11-07-2006 12:28 PM      Profile for Mike Croaro   Email Mike Croaro   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Went to see "Jonestown: The Life & Death of Peoples Temple" at the landmark Shattuck Theatre in Berkeley, CA. Lamp not focused evenly. The right side of the screen was much brighter than the left side of the screen.

Mike

 |  IP: Logged

Hillary Charles
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 748
From: York, PA, USA
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 11-09-2006 07:47 AM      Profile for Hillary Charles   Email Hillary Charles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Saw a double feature of "Dial M For Murder" and "North By Northwest" at the local arthouse. Two projector set-up, and a new adventure at every reel change.

At one point, the show was stopped because the reel was threaded in backwards, and for a few seconds we could watch the soundtrack on the right side. It's probably a very good idea to make sure the leader isn't spliced onto the film the wrong way (if that was the reason, and not just simple carelessness).

Once during each movie, I had to tell someone to focus the image. I was told "it's the film" but lo and behold, each time, the image was focused, and acceptable for the duration of the reel. This continued to a greater or lesser extent for the whole show. Some reels were actually focused after the change and stayed in focus! Imagine that.

Every single time we go there, we have to tell someone about the focus, and on more than one occasion, we're told "it's the film." The fact that the image could subsequently actually be focused is a clear indication that the problem isn't the film but the film handler.

I was the only one to say something about the focus, and I later wrote them an email in the hopes that they'll improve their presentation. Since I didn't get a reply, I guess my decision to stay away for good is probably best for my blood pressure.

I'm so glad they didn't try to run "Dial M" in 3-D!

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 11-09-2006 08:52 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
YUM ! "Spaghetti" served from a "FOX-BOX" bowl.

 -

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 11-10-2006 09:46 AM      Profile for Bill Gabel   Email Bill Gabel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I find I get more canned "Spaghetti" than from the box.

Wouldn't it be a operator's with poor judgment in using cheap tape and a depot that did not check (open box) print, to see if the contents settled during shipping?

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-10-2006 01:03 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I sure wish there was a way to get ETS to use a spacer reel in those stupid boxes the way TES has been doing. That'd stop 90% of that damage.

 |  IP: Logged

Blaine Young
Master Film Handler

Posts: 477
From: Kirkland, WA, USA
Registered: Sep 2006


 - posted 11-10-2006 01:16 PM      Profile for Blaine Young   Email Blaine Young   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just wish they'd stop using the "Fox Box" packaging. When they are crammed with 8 full reels, (Departed & Flyboys come to mind) the things are too freggin heavy to move. I suppose it's 'easier' to have 1 package for the complete shipment, but I prefer the cans.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 11-10-2006 01:20 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
There is nobody I know of who likes those godamn Fox boxes...except for the DFS/ETS depot guys. They prefer them because they don't have to keep up with 2 or 3 cans. [Roll Eyes]

Please, please, please someone hurt your back, fall down the stairs or whatever and sue the living shit out of them for it. There is no excuse for them to assume that everyone that handles film is able to pick up a box with several reels in it and carry it up stairs and such with the weight all to one side (or in front).

If they would just make 3 and 4 space Fox boxes...all would be fine safety-wise. It's nice to know they give a shit about your health and safety, isn't it?

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 51 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  ...  49  50  51 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.