|
|
This topic comprises 9 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
|
|
Author
|
Topic: New security featrue on Madagascar 2
|
|
|
|
|
Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 11-07-2008 01:53 PM
Ah, so when all theatres are finally digital with no way to copy off the screen without getting hauled off to FBI bootleggers jail, then that means we will see the end of piracy! Then the studios can give back some of that 6 BILLION they claim they loose every year by, let's see....HALVING the rental terms to the theaters? Maybe charging $3 a ticket again like before there was video and piracy? Oh, wait -- there are the copies that come from the AMPAS screener DVDs, and the hotels.
I didn't realize that a lot of titles are recorded directly off the PPV systems in hotel rooms. I discovered this when I was doing jury duty two weeks ago and at a lunch break while I was sitting in Quiznos, directly across from the Supreme Court building, an area crawling with police, a guy came with a suitcase filled with a slew of DVD titles. I spotted W and RELIGULOUS and out of curiosity I asked if they were made with a camcorder in a movie theatre. The guy was very knowledgeable of his wares and assured me they weren't -- he said they were made from hotel Pay Per View. I asked him if he knew what he was doing was illegal and he sort of laughed and said he "had a 'deal' with the movie companies." Yeah, right. The deal being, they won't prosecute him if he makes sure he doesn't get caught.
The thing is, the minute they start offering stuff on PPV, it's over; perfect copies ripped faster than you can say RELIGULOUS. They can stop wasting their time ruining the film experience for honest people who pay $10 a ticket and start patroling hotels with their infrared cameras.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 11-08-2008 12:02 AM
quote: If 5 different movies were found that all were captured at your theater, Of course it doesn't identify the perpetrator: IT ISN'T MEANT TO.
Wait a minute, unless the dropout in each print is unique in some way with some sort of identifying code or specific placement of the dropout, how can it be determined what theatre it comes from?
Unless the dropouts are able to carry some specific marker -- and we don't know that this is not embedded somehow that they are not revealing, which certainly could be, just as John said there was more to the CAP code than was made public -- which can identify the theatre where the bootleg was made, what good is it? And why is a sound dropout any better than the CAP codes? In terms of distracting artifax, I think the level of intrusion that a sound anomoly causes is much more overtly distracting than the visiual codes ever were, which, as far as we know, weren't specific to a particular theatre either.
And I still contend that lab copies are much more an economic threat than painfully poor off-screeners. What's more of an economic treat to Rolex, a watch that looks like it's made out of tin or one that can only be identified as a counterfet by an expert with a microscope?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 9 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|