Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » New security featrue on Madagascar 2 (Page 6)

 
This topic comprises 9 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 
 
Author Topic: New security featrue on Madagascar 2
Galen Murphy-Fahlgren
Master Film Handler

Posts: 405
From: Canton, MI, USA
Registered: Oct 2007


 - posted 11-14-2008 11:43 PM      Profile for Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Email Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Jason Whyte
Mission Accomplished.
Fixed.

I found this to be distracting, but less so that what we had on Dark Knight. That one had three or so offending spots, which dropped out to a very poorly mixed analog track for quite a bit longer. The assistant manager at that theater called and demanded a replacement reel, and after a bit of hoopla and several very critical phone conversations, we got it, but not until thousands of our customers had been subjected to it. This was with Dark Knight playing with a CP650 and Cat. 701. In Madagascar, which I saw in a theater with a CP55, DA20 and Cat. 701, it was relatively faint, despite being in a loud action sequence. I was probably the only person in the audience to notice it, but I wasn't even listening for it. I still think that studios and labs should be producing content for the most critical audience possible, which is likely projectionists in this case. Since this did not fly under this projectionists radar, I unilaterally condemn it.

 |  IP: Logged

Jesse Skeen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1517
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 11-15-2008 05:14 AM      Profile for Jesse Skeen   Email Jesse Skeen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just as a matter of principle I should start illegally copying the official DVDs of these movies when they come out. Of course then they might start messing THOSE up for the paying customers too!

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 11-15-2008 05:56 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't think Batman had that anti-piracy audio coding on it. This is however a very convenient situation for the labs, as when people have a problem they are going to start automatically ASSUMING that the problem with the sound is the anti-piracy coding and permit their presentations to be further degraded.

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 11-15-2008 06:28 AM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Correct.

They will never replace any reel 3 of Madagascar 2 for audio issues. Even if the issue is not related to anti piracy.

And some theater will assume that any sound issue reported by the customers is due to anti piracy.

 |  IP: Logged

Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-15-2008 08:37 AM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Marco Giustini
And some theater will assume that any sound issue reported by the customers is due to anti piracy.
Worse still, they will tell the customers that any audio problem is anti-piracy rather than admit something is wrong with their presentation (or fixing it).

 |  IP: Logged

Galen Murphy-Fahlgren
Master Film Handler

Posts: 405
From: Canton, MI, USA
Registered: Oct 2007


 - posted 11-15-2008 11:11 AM      Profile for Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Email Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, Brad, if Dark Knight didn't have it, two things are true. First of all, Deluxe's lab work is even worse than I believed, and my belief was that it was not good. And secondly, they have trained their people to do just that, and tell people whenever there is something wrong that it is an intentional anti-piracy measure. The only thing to be gained here is animosity towards them, which could lead to empathy for pirates, as per Jesse's tongue in cheek statement. I happen to take piracy very personally (or I would, if some jackass would just give me the opportunity), but I also take people intentionally screwing up my presentation personally.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 11-15-2008 03:13 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Galen, you need to get your facts straight. Stop blaming "Deluxe's lab work" for your defective Batman print. Warner Bros is the studio that made Batman and they strike their prints at Techniclor LAB. Just because you got the print sent to you from the Deluxe SHIPPING DEPOT means nothing in this discussion.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-15-2008 03:41 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm confused. Any normal business that sells a defective product is obligated (both legally and morally) to replace it with a non-defective product. If I buy a toaster and it doesn't work, I can return it to the store with my receipt; they will then either replace it with a working one or give me a refund. Why is that that labs and distributors aren't subject to this same (minimal) standard?

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 11-15-2008 04:32 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
More importantly, why isn't Dolby doing anything about this? I can understand Sony not caring in regards to their all-but-dead SDDS format, but I find it sad that Dolby is permitting the labs to deliberately destroy their product.

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 11-15-2008 08:51 PM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Last time I heard them they were trying to do something.
In the meantime Disney stopped using this anti-piracy, so perhaps the future will be better.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 11-15-2008 08:56 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Marco Giustini
Last time I heard them they were trying to do something.
Who did you hear it from? Sounds like a rumor.

 |  IP: Logged

Galen Murphy-Fahlgren
Master Film Handler

Posts: 405
From: Canton, MI, USA
Registered: Oct 2007


 - posted 11-15-2008 11:24 PM      Profile for Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Email Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad, you're right, my mistake. I have had more issues with Deluxe prints, so my default thought when I get bad lab work is "Deluxe." Thank you for pointing that out.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 11-16-2008 12:14 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Knowing Dolby's long history of improving theatre sound and the committment to this goal that we all are familiar with, from their product support to their detailed manuals which are as educational as they are practical for the booth personnel, I can't believe they will not have serious issues with this nonsense.

Since every film that is released with Dolby sound, be it digital or analog, must be licensed from Dolby and must meet strict Dolby parameters. It can't be a Dolby track if it deviates from those specs. For a studio to purposely introduce dropouts and mess up the Dolby track I would imagine violates their agreement. Dolby can easily say that they will not license a Dolby track if the intent of the studio, for whatever reason, security or not, is to mess with the spec.

Dolby is in a position to demand that the Dolby spec be followed or they don't get to use Dolby sound. Seeing as how without a Dolby license this would mean the studio gets to have only DTS and Sony for digital and UltraStereo for analog, it might change their minds about this kind of "CAP" for sound. See how that sits with the MPAA members.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 11-16-2008 02:38 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Galen Murphy-Fahlgren
work is "Deluxe."
...why I still call it ETS instead of DFS .. too many "DeLuxes" around here...

 |  IP: Logged

Max Biela
Film Handler

Posts: 89
From: Dortmund, Germany
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 11-16-2008 04:50 AM      Profile for Max Biela   Email Max Biela   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad,

DTS definitely cuts out at the same time. Maybe the situation is different in Europe? If you complain about sound dropouts on your print you get a replacement reel without the code but DTS will still drop to SR at the same time even if there isn't any code on the SR track and SRD/SDDS play flawlessly. As the Timecode is perfectly fine on both prints the discs must contain the information when to switch to SR, just like they switch to Non-Sync or a certain backup format.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 9 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.