Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Interstellar and fader 7 (Page 5)

 
This topic comprises 8 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8 
 
Author Topic: Interstellar and fader 7
Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 11-17-2014 08:21 PM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Louis Bornwasser
The better the playback and acoustics, the louder you can tolerate. Bad sound always sounds too loud. I think it was Cerwin-Vega that had something like that in the corporate motto.
Completely agree, the acoustics and tuning of the sound system are paramount, and if the filmmakers recorded the film at spec there should be no problem playing the movie at fader level 7.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-17-2014 08:55 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Louis Bornwasser
I think it was Cerwin-Vega that had something like that in the corporate motto.
Cerwin-Vega's slogan was "Loud is beautiful...if it's clean."

quote: Terry Lynn-Stevens
if the filmmakers recorded the film at spec there should be no problem playing the movie at fader level 7
That depends on what you mean by "no problem." If you mean no problem with overdriving the system, then you're right -- but there are plenty of people (mostly over 50, I suppose) who just don't like things to be real loud. Even if it sounds fantastic, they just find super-loudness to be unpleasant.

Me, I'm over 50 but I still love a good loud soundtrack if it's well mixed.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 11-17-2014 11:07 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Marco Giustini
Once you know it was intentional, I find it fun!
Why would anyone intend this where everyone is bad-mouthing the sound in your movie? I await your logical, well-thought out reply.

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 11-17-2014 11:08 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hey, I'm way past 50 and I love a loud movie, if it's done well. [Smile]

CNolan is in deep deep denial over this.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 11-17-2014 11:28 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ego is a wonderful thing to swim in. And I should know! [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 11-17-2014 11:38 PM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't remember anything Cerwin Vega made to be all that clean.

As to audio mixing, one of the hardest things to get right on these loud movies is the dialog. No one in the room can tell if the dialog is understandable after a few days as the mixers and director have long since memorized the lines so can no longer judge this objectively. Plus few dubbing people have the stones to stand up to the director or his people. It's our good fortune James Cameron has good judgement about these things. Seems like his movies have great soundtracks. Can't think of any that did not from Aliens, T2, etc., all very good.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 11-18-2014 12:04 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Sam D. Chavez
No one in the room can tell if the dialog is understandable after a few days as the mixers and director have long since memorized the lines so can no longer judge this objectively.
Yup, you just said it better than I did.

I'm guessing you didn't see the theatrical release of Terminator 1 in glorious mono? [Razz] Seriously though James Cameron mixes have always been ahead of their time. Aliens is a little dated, but mixing technology wasn't quite what it is today back in 1986. For 1986 mixing abilities (post production time also factoring into this), it was phenomenal. From there it just got better and better.

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 11-18-2014 01:27 AM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually, I did see T1. It was pretty low budget but showed some promise. "I'll be back" endures.

Cameron could be pretty intimidating but if you knew your stuff and stood your ground he would listen, or so I've heard.

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 11-18-2014 10:27 AM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Carsten Kurz
I don't think the audience has a 'right' to understand every single word in a movie. They have a right for a top-notch presentation.
But the artistic expression of the creative people making the movie is an offer, not an obligation.

Although the audience doesn't have the "right to understand every single word", it doesn't imply the audience doesn't have a right to complain. I agree to what seems to be the majority at this point: This sound mix has issues.

I've seen this thing about three and a half times now, one of the showings was an OV show without subtitles. In that show, literally everybody had issues understanding the dialogue at one point or another. The fact that one of the right front channel amps died halfway trough the show wasn't helping (people were offered a refund, although most didn't even notice...), but it didn't affect the center channel, it primarily messed up Hans Zimmers pipe organ fest.

I guess nobody will always understand every single word in each and every movie, your mind usually is sufficiently capable of filling in the gaps. The problem though, if this is happens repeatedly, it becomes distracting. People start to overly focus on what people are saying, trying to figure out the words that make up the dialogue.

Also, it leads to many complains, people that are asking you to fix the sound. You can tell them: It's the way the director wanted it. You do not only sound stupid if you tell them this, but you cannot really blame them asking for a (in their mind) perfect presentation from you.

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 11-18-2014 03:51 PM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bad speech intelligibility has been here before. Among the worst were Heaven's Gate and Days of Heaven. Days of Heaven was purposefuly murky as an artistic choice and he more or less made his point.

Heavens Gate was a director gone wild with an incomprehensible plot. Early previews went very badly and the director tried to blame the bad sound mix for the poor reception to the film.

Now we have the opposite problem with the director saying I meant to do that and you should like it and by inference, if you don't you must be stupid.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 11-19-2014 03:22 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sadly, the takeaway from all of this is that yet another movie given a high profile release on film has literally hit the front pages of the national and international press because of technical problems. Even though the dialog issue had nothing to do with the film prints, I fear that studio and distribution decision-makers might not understand that when it comes to future decisions as to whether or not to release on film. Add to that some trashed prints (not as widely publicized as The Master, but to add to the write-off in Atlanta, I'm hearing reports that a 35mm print was trashed in San Diego) and the fact that the movie in general did not perform as well as anticipated, and these are not positive straws in the wind.

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Cassedy
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1661
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Dec 2006


 - posted 11-19-2014 05:03 PM      Profile for Jim Cassedy   Email Jim Cassedy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Leo Enticknap
the movie in general did not perform as well as anticipated
The fact that the movie was trounced at the box office last weekend by
"Dumb & Dumber To" leaves me little hope for the future of film, the
movie industry as a whole and mankind in general. We're doomed!

Can you buy cyanide pills online?

 |  IP: Logged

Noah Katz
Film Handler

Posts: 4
From: Santa Monica, Ca
Registered: Oct 2012


 - posted 11-19-2014 05:06 PM      Profile for Noah Katz   Email Noah Katz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Of course everyone has a difference of opinion. I will say that in a perfect world, 7 in a cinema should accurately reflect the reference sound level on a mix stage. As we all know SMPTE is in the midst of doing a complete analysis and overhaul of current cinema audio B chain standards since sadly very rarely do cinemas and dub stages accurately reflect one another.

Having said all that, I did have the pleasure of viewing the 15/70 version of Interstellar multiple times at the TCL Chinese IMAX theatre in Hollywood, California. I personally thought the sound was incredible. I was aware that Christopher Nolan did QC the mix at the TCL Chinese, so I assume I was viewing and listening to the film in the way that the director intended it to be presented and heard. I brought a few friends to see the film with me (all non cinema industry people) and nobody I was with had a problem with the soundtrack or sound levels (Which were played at the reference level)

Sadly there are many people not having this type of positive sonic listening experience with Interstellar at their local theaters, I can only hope that perhaps once the new SMPTE standards for B chain settings are adopted, more theaters will more closely match the Dub stage as well as the Directors intended vision.

Just for everyone to understand, Per the Hollywood reporter article dated 11/16/2014

quote:
Christopher Nolan's Interstellar has rocketed past $300 million at the worldwide box office after its first two weekends.
quote:
Through Sunday, the movie's global total is $321.9 million, including a foreign take of $224.1 million
quote:
Interstellar is doing massive business in Imax theaters around the world, racking up a total of $50 million in ticket sales. In China, the movie shattered opening records for a 2D title ($6.6 million).
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/global-box-office-interstellar-rockets-747521

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 11-19-2014 05:22 PM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Noah Katz
Of course everyone has a difference of opinion. I will say that in a perfect world, 7 in a cinema should accurately reflect the reference sound level on a mix stage.
In a perfect world, we should first have a perfect definition of 7.

And even if 7 has been defined in all its details and globally been implemented as the new, absolute gold standard, we're still nowhere if the director or his henchmen like it loud.

Furthermore, Interstellar might not be the anticipated success in the U.S., but it did great in Europe and is still doing fine right now. Unfortunately, Europe is an almost film-free zone...

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 11-19-2014 05:39 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It's also doing well in Korea and largely the people seemed to have liked the movie; personally, I thought there were times where the dialog wasn't clear, the story was largely boring, and many shots were completely out of focus.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 8 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.