Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » More junk for sale on Ebay (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 85 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  ...  83  84  85 
 
Author Topic: More junk for sale on Ebay
Dustin Mitchell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1865
From: Mondovi, WI, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 12-10-2003 04:36 PM      Profile for Dustin Mitchell   Email Dustin Mitchell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
At least he's being honest by indicating they won't play in consumer CD players.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 12-10-2003 07:38 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
The original Jurrassic Park discs won't even work in any of the newer DTS systems.
Yes they do. They play just fine (the 6-track discs, not the stereo discs). However it is important to note that if the movie is stopped for some reason, certain later model players cannot pick up where it left off. Seems I recall something about the dts player wanting to see the beginning of the reel for a "start command" or something along those lines.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-10-2003 07:45 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So what's the deal with the 4-track "DTS Stereo" players? I know very little about them, except that they a) aren't made anymore, b) used different disks, c) are only useable in single-projector installations, as they output a two-track matrixed (!) soundtrack and feed the "projector 2" input on the processor, and d) were primarily a way to give cheap theatre owners a means to put "digital" on the marquee.

Maybe this is a topic for a separate thread, but I'd be curious about the history of this format.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 12-10-2003 08:04 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
As I understand the story, it was more of an issue of there not being enough cdrom drives back in 1993 to meet the demand, so it was some kind of quick workaround to meet the Jurassic Park deadline. I don't know of any units that were not sent back to dts for upgrade to 6 track.

If someone knows different, please chime in.

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 12-11-2003 04:57 AM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If there was a shortage, then I don't think that was the whole story.

At the time that Dolby Digital was launched I read an article about it, at the end of which was a brief mention, probably just a single paragraph, about a competing system (DTS) which was about to be released, I'm pretty sure that it named 'Jurassic Park' as the first title, because I remember making a point of going to see it in order to hear the new system. Several other systems were also mentioned, with almost no details given; CDS, SDDS, LC Concepts, and something with 12 inch discs.

The impression given was that DTS was a cheap alternative to the Dolby system, and would be available in two versions, six-channel DTS-6 for theatres that wanted Dolby but couldn't afford it, and four-channel (matrixed) DTS-S (upgradeable to the full six channel version) for ones that were really poverty stricken, and couldn't afford even the full DTS! A somewhat unfair assessment of the system. Shortly after reading this I went to a presentation by Dolby at which their digital system was demonstrated with a clip from 'Batman Returns'. I think this was before any public use of the system in this country. During a discussion after the show, a representative from Dolby accepted that their system was not cheap, but indicated that it was intended for use only in a few 'top' cinemas, and was not expected to be as widely used as it has since become. (I can't remember the exact wording used, but it was along those lines.) I asked about what the implications were for 70mm. They stated that they had no plans for a 70mm digital system, and while I didn't get a definate 'yes', they did rather give the impression that they saw 35mm Dolby Digital replacing 70mm 6-track magnetic at lower cost, in much the same way as analogue Dolby Stereo had replaced 35mm 4-track magnetic.

It was clearly stated that Dolby SR was seen as the apporpriate upgrade path for cinemas which did not already have it (many in this country at that time) with digital being a prestige, limited market product; whether permanently, or just in the short term, I'm not sure. Basically, it was seen as an upgrade for the sort of houses which were already 70mm Dolby six-channel equipped. The Cat. 699 and DA-10 fitted in quite nicely to an installation with a CP-200, aux unit, MPU-1, SRA-5, etc.

DTS seemed to promote their system rather differently; they saw it as being much more widely used. For the sort of venue with a four-channel system with a CP-50 the DTS-S system would have been a convienent upgrade, just bolt on the reader, put the DTS unit in the rack, minimal cabling to do, and off you go. DTS-6 would have involved more work and greater cost, re-wiring surrounds, extra amps, probably new processor, etc.

DTS got off to a good start, with 'Jurassic Park' and 'Schlindler's List', possibly having more installations than Dolby in this country at that time. After that things seemed to slow down, at the same time as Dolby Digital gained popularity, and became much more widely installed. I would certainly think that there are many more Dolby installations than DTS here now.

Shortly afterwards (less than a year?) the demise of DTS-S was announced. I don't think many places ever installed it, I've never seen one. Most 35mm cinemas either stayed with analogue, or upgraded to six-channel when they went digital, sometimes also upgrading amps, speakers etc. at the same time. Of course, in later years, Digital has become much more widespread.

At about this time, I bought several CD-ROM drives, and never found any shortage, if there was one I think it must have been very brief, just waiting for the next shipment to arrive. In an old computer I still have one the Toshiba caddy-loading drives that were used in the first DTS units, and it is still used.

 |  IP: Logged

Jesse Skeen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1517
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 12-11-2003 01:39 PM      Profile for Jesse Skeen   Email Jesse Skeen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The now-gone Cinema 2 in Davis had the matrix DTS system installed for Jurassic Park- the last movie shown there with it was Crooklyn. It was then upgraded to 6-track but run through an old CP-50 with mono surrounds for a couple months, then finally replaced with a CP-65 with split surrounds during the last week of Timecop (final movie played there was the reissue of Saving Private Ryan- the projector and sound system are now at the Varsity, though they don't seem to be getting used much.)

 |  IP: Logged

William Hooper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1879
From: Mobile, AL USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-12-2004 02:54 AM      Profile for William Hooper   Author's Homepage   Email William Hooper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"RARE Antique NATIONAL 35mm Hand Crank Movie Projector"

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2979344273

"This was a simple device as there is no shutter in the mechanism so the images just slid into one another."

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-12-2004 06:53 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No it wasn't a shortage of drives just a lower cost system. It also allowed processors that didn't have a multitrack input to handle digital
It ran into some problems namely that the signal had to pass through the system NR
It would only run out of the box as a single machine system
After Jurrasic they discovered most people had either installed or upgraded to 6 channel so it was dropped

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Hill
I love my cootie bug

Posts: 7595
From: Hollywood, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 01-27-2004 03:16 PM      Profile for Phil Hill   Email Phil Hill       Edit/Delete Post 
WTF am I missing? $5K for Famous 35 mm Film Clips on one Reel, Item number: 3380643754 ?

...AND there are people bidding on it! [Confused]

Imagine what the guy could get if he had the whole print? YIKES! [Roll Eyes]

>>> Phil

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Schaffer
"Where is the
Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002


 - posted 01-27-2004 03:28 PM      Profile for Michael Schaffer   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Schaffer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Probably because the reel allegedly contains the Solo and Jabba scene that was cut and restored in the Special Edition. The text makes it appear as if the footage here was the original scene. I doubt that very much as I understand that scene was cut before the film was ever released, so it is very unlikely that there is release print material of that scene. It was probably slashed from a Special Edition print. I guess some collectors are willing to pay that much for what they think is a rare item...

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Hill
I love my cootie bug

Posts: 7595
From: Hollywood, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 01-27-2004 03:37 PM      Profile for Phil Hill   Email Phil Hill       Edit/Delete Post 
I get all that, Mike. But 5 GRAND? Holy smokes!

>>> Phil

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 01-27-2004 04:38 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Maybe the bidder in question is Mr. Lucas or Mr. Valenti doing a spot of amateur detective work...

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Hill
I love my cootie bug

Posts: 7595
From: Hollywood, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 01-27-2004 04:49 PM      Profile for Phil Hill   Email Phil Hill       Edit/Delete Post 
Gosh, I don't know about that, Leo.

Mr. Lucas is way too busy promoting Digital "movies", and Jacko Baby is WAAAAAY too busy promoting himself.

>>> Phil

 |  IP: Logged

Floyd Justin Newton
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 559
From: Phoenix, Arizona, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 01-27-2004 06:15 PM      Profile for Floyd Justin Newton   Email Floyd Justin Newton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This looks, sounds, and has the odor of a major rip-off to
me.
fjn

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Hipp
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1462
From: Mesquite, Tx (east of Dallas)
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 01-27-2004 06:32 PM      Profile for Chris Hipp   Email Chris Hipp   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Oh Just great!

Now someone is going to outbid me, thanks Phil!

No, seriously what a bunch of idiots, maybe $5k for an original (entire) print

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 85 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  ...  83  84  85 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.