Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » More junk for sale on Ebay (Page 83)

 
This topic comprises 85 pages: 1  2  3  ...  80  81  82  83  84  85 
 
Author Topic: More junk for sale on Ebay
Jeremy Weigel
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1062
From: Edmond, OK, USA
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 07-24-2011 10:44 PM      Profile for Jeremy Weigel   Email Jeremy Weigel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
$3K for a SDDS 2000 system? [Eek!] SDDS 2000 System

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Froes
Film Handler

Posts: 26
From: phoenix az USA
Registered: Aug 2010


 - posted 07-24-2011 11:12 PM      Profile for Jonathan Froes   Email Jonathan Froes   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
yup! that sdds is there for about 2 years...hehe!

do you think they should lower the price a little?

 |  IP: Logged

Edward Havens
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 614
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Mar 2008


 - posted 07-24-2011 11:22 PM      Profile for Edward Havens   Email Edward Havens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Since it mentions the most recent 8 channel SDDS release being Spider-Man 3, that listing is over four years old now.

 |  IP: Logged

Jon Miller
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 973
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 07-25-2011 07:53 PM      Profile for Jon Miller   Email Jon Miller   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
About six years ago I bought fully operational SDDS 2000 processor and reader with cable for a whopping $500 plus shipping. The only thing missing was a projector bracket, which I fashioned from a slab of aluminum.

I guess the original packaging materials and factory-sealed cable must be worth the extra $2500 to the seller. [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Joshua Waaland
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 800
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 07-27-2011 10:29 AM      Profile for Joshua Waaland   Email Joshua Waaland   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The seller of that unit is Norm who owns Smart Devices. I don't think he is in any hurry to sell it as it is probably old new stock from a past job. I have bought other things from him in the past that were leftovers from past jobs, but at much better prices.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Froes
Film Handler

Posts: 26
From: phoenix az USA
Registered: Aug 2010


 - posted 07-27-2011 01:38 PM      Profile for Jonathan Froes   Email Jonathan Froes   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
i've paid 40 bucks for my sdds and 10 bucks for the cable. now that i have it running i should've just spend more on a dolby unit.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 08-20-2011 06:48 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Anyone a Marilyn Monroe fan?

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 08-21-2011 12:16 AM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
I own the copyright to this film, and it is registered with the Library of Congress. This is the only copy that exists. I am selling the original film and an original photo of Sgt. George T. Kerlin - the man that took the footage, along with all copyrights.
Suspicious. 1) If it's registered with the LOC, they should have a copy. 2) If it was filmed "on assignment" by an Army officer, it would have been produced by the US Government, making it public domain.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 08-21-2011 12:41 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
... and on Super 8mm film? Smells like a good scam.

 |  IP: Logged

Damien Taylor
Master Film Handler

Posts: 493
From: Perth, Western Australia
Registered: Apr 2007


 - posted 08-21-2011 11:32 AM      Profile for Damien Taylor   Email Damien Taylor   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It's almost half leader!

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 08-21-2011 07:31 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Monte L Fullmer
... and on Super 8mm film? Smells like a good scam.
The description on the Ebay listing doesn't say that it's Super 8, but if it had, that would have been an instant red flag. Monroe died in 1962, and the Super 8 format was launched in 1965. Therefore, reversal original footage on Super 8 showing Monroe cannot exist. Any Super 8 element containing footage of Monroe has, by definition, to be a copy from a separate source.

quote: Adam Martin
2) If it was filmed "on assignment" by an Army officer, it would have been produced by the US Government, making it public domain.
The issue there is the definition of 'on assignment'. If you license such footage from NARA, the small print will contain a copyright disclaimer to the effect that if someone claiming to be the copyright owner comes after you, the argument is between you and them to settle. About ten years ago the producers of a TV documentary (I think it was The Third Reich in Colour but could not swear to it) used some footage from a Kodachrome home movie taken by a US Air Force officer stationed in Germany of bombed out ruins in Berlin in the fall of 1945. They thought it was US Government footage, and thus PD, but the officer's son later claimed that he'd shot it with his own personal camera and film, on his own initiative and as a personal memento, not a public record: in other words, that he had not been ordered to make the film and therefore it was not done 'on assignment'. He had later given the film to NARA voluntarily, but no paperwork was signed regarding copyright.

They did a deal in the end, but from archivists I've chatted to about this, my understanding is that you're only on certain ground claiming PD if you have a rock solid case that the footage was shot directly in the course of a US Government paid employee's duties, using Government-owned equipment and consumables, etc. etc.

 |  IP: Logged

Robert E. Allen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1078
From: Checotah, Oklahoma
Registered: Jul 2002


 - posted 08-21-2011 08:26 PM      Profile for Robert E. Allen   Email Robert E. Allen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, not me Brad. The bimbo couldn't act if her life depended on it.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-21-2011 08:55 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
And that $3000.00 SDDS is offered by none other than Norm Schneider oops... I guess I blew his cover... Miss Sweeties?

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 08-21-2011 10:27 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Leo Enticknap
Any Super 8 element containing footage of Monroe has, by definition, to be a copy from a separate source.
Obviously this doesn't mean much, but the center hole in that reel denotes Super 8, not the Regular 8 standard. The picture isn't clear enough to see the perforation size to distinguish it.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-21-2011 11:04 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Has to be a scam. I don't know any shipping company that is going to insure anything for 60 grand... not UPS not Fed-Ex not USPS nor any company without making very special arrangements before hand. The ad is just a little too casual for this sort of thing. If it is that secial and rare or that valualable it would be done at a major auction house.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 85 pages: 1  2  3  ...  80  81  82  83  84  85 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.