|
|
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Does no one care about the Red Sox???
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 10-27-2004 11:58 PM
So much for that curse. The Yankeeeezz have gotta be crying and whining to their mommie now. The assholes. I wonder who George Steinbrenner is going to fire over this thing this time.
I could not give a luke warm popcorn fart if the Yankees see another world series for the next 500 years. They've been "bogarting" it for too long anyway and it got Goddamned boring! Shit, get the Mets in there for Christ's sake if a NY team is going to represent in the 'series. The Yankees, and their fans, are just damned boring. At least the Mets and their fans appreciate getting in the biggest series in all of baseball.
And I can say that with authority seeing as how unappreciative and overly cocky as many Yankees fans had become over the years. I lived in New York City for five years and saw the arrogance for myself. At least the Mets fans kept it in perspective and had some humility. Yankees fans act like it is a crime against God if they don't win a world series every year. It is only fitting that Boston finally gives them a boot in the ass. I'd also like to bring up how the Florida Marlins kicked the Yankees' ass last year. Damn I'm tired of the Yankees. Hell, I relished it when the Arizona Diamondbacks beat the Yankees in the 2001 World Series, the one series where a NY team seemed destined to win. That is how boring it has become for the Yankees to win or even appear in a World Series. It is about damned time they took their turn at being a cellar dweller team.
The next thing on the agenda, a world series victory for the Cubbies! Cubs fans have been doing more suffering than the Red Sox.
Also on the to do list, at least some kind of world series appearance for the Houston Astros. Their franchise has gone the longest amount of time without even a world series appearance, much less a win. I still cannot get over how they choked against the Mets in 1986 in the NLCS. They got even closer to the World Series this year. But this was Boston's turn. Sometime soon it has to go Houston's way.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rachel Craven
Madam Moderator

Posts: 2190
From: Pensacola, FL
Registered: Dec 2000
|
posted 10-28-2004 09:11 PM
Damn Joe, make me type!!!
quote: Joe Redifer What is this "curse" bullshit everyone keeps harping about?
In 1918 the Red Sox won their 5th World Series, the most by any club at that time. One of the stars of the Boston championship franchise was a pitcher, The Babe, Babe Ruth or The Bambino whatever you want to call him...(Really named, George Herman Ruth).
In 1920, Red Sox owner Harry Frazee needed money to finance his "girlfriend's play", so he sold Babe Ruth's contract to the New York Yankees for $100,000 (plus a loan backed up by Fenway Park).
Since then, the Yankees, who had never won a World Championship before getting Ruth on their side, have gone on to win 26, and are arguably one of the greatest success stories in the history of the sport.
Meanwhile, the Boston Red Sox have appeared in only four World Series since 1918, losing each one in game seven (ALWAYS GAME 7!). Many consider Boston's performance after the departure of Babe Ruth to be attributable to "The Curse of the Bambino." Hence what we usually call "The Curse".
quote: Joe Redifer What is up with many of the batter's helmets and some of the bats?
Ok, not sure why people do what they do but I know from experience that the equipment is expensive! Not that they should have a problem with that...
My guess is its for luck and the old saying, if its not broke, don't fix it. The moldy old helmets work so why replace them? And when you find a bat you really like its hard to get used to a new one. I don't care what anyone says...you can weigh and measure your wooden bats all you want but no two are ever the same, they just don't balance the same. So it really sucks when you break one...
OK?
| IP: Logged
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 10-28-2004 09:50 PM
Wasn't that pine tar on the batting helmets?
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6340531/
quote: Ramirez was the MVP of the first inning, by far.
After getting some pine tar from the top of his gooey batting helmet, he hit a solo home run with two outs into the loge level in left field.
http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/articles/2004/07/16/nixon_its_dirty_pool/
quote: Trot Nixon, his words dripping with anger and sarcasm, said he has not received a directive from Major League Baseball instructing him to wipe off the pine tar obscuring the "B" logo on his batting helmet. "The reason I put pine tar on my helmet is so I don't have to put as much on the bat. Manny [Ramirez] was the first one to suggest I do that. What next? When I slide headfirst and get dirt on the `Boston' on my jersey, are they going to make me change my jersey?
"It's a joke, that's what that is. An absolute joke, and you can quote me."
At Tuesday's All-Star Game in Houston, a source in the commissioner's office, discussing a dispute with Nomar Garciaparra over the Sox shortstop covering the MLB logo on the back of his helmet, for which he was fined and threatened with suspension, said MLB also planned to issue a directive instructing players such as Nixon and Ramirez to clean their helmets so the team logo would be visible. It was a marketing issue, the source said. "You'll see a difference at the start of the second half," the source said.
Nixon said yesterday he had heard nothing from MLB, and if he does, he plans to defy the directive.
"They're just trying to control everything," Nixon said. "This ain't football. This isn't the NFL. I'm supposed to worry about that? What about getting hits and winning ballgames. That doesn't have anything to do with whether I put pine tar on the `B' on my helmet.
"I don't care what they say. I'm not paying any fine."
Players use pine tar to improve their grip on their bats. Often it is applied directly to the bats; Nixon said he puts it on his helmet so he has better control over how much he gets on the bat handle.
"It would be a different story if John Henry or Larry Lucchino or Theo [Epstein], the team ownership had come to me," Nixon said. "And if the fans had say they didn't like it, that it was ugly, I'd pay attention to that. But I'm sorry, I don't think this should be such a big deal."
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|