|
|
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Post your random links here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99
|
posted 08-13-2008 01:59 AM
Wal-Mart is the new Jack Valenti
quote: I was in Spring Hill, Florida visiting my grandparents, who have all the family pictures of great grandparents and great-great grandparents. Doing the good familial thing, I decided to take the albums and scan the photos so that the rest of the family could see them. I only had one day to do this, and the only place near them was Wal-Mart (the Supercenter by highway 19). So I take the (sometimes) 100 year old photos to Wal-Mart and begin scanning them on their machine.
After a while, a Wal-Mart employee accosts me and tells me that I can't do that because those images are "Copyright to the studios that took them." I look down at my pictures. The picture she is pointing to is one of my great grandmother, taken about 1925. She has been dead since 1998. The photography studio (assuming it was taken by a studio) is not marked, and is long out of business, and the person who took the photo is long dead, as are, likely, his children and all of his business associates. The only known copy of the photo is the one I'm holding, which is owned by my grandparents, who gave it to me to copy.
In disbelief, I point out that the photo is almost 100 years old and the people are all dead. Undeterred, the Wal-Mart employee informs me that "Copyright lasts forever. It's the law." My scans up to that point are deleted and I'm free to leave the store with my old photos unscanned. I guess I should be thankful they didn't have a portable shredder on hand to seize my photos and do away with them right then and there. Is that in the next set of magic federal laws?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian Michael Weidemann
Expert cat molester

Posts: 944
From: Costa Mesa, CA United States
Registered: Feb 2004
|
posted 08-13-2008 04:23 PM
It all comes down to some blanket corporate policy at Wal-mart-greens, or wherever, which dictates they can in no way ever be held responsible for anything. All corporations have such policies. The company cannot participate in (make money from) a copyright violation, and from a practical standpoint, sure, a general policy makes sense. It's not the employee's fault that their company would fire them and make the ENTIRE staff at every store watch even more training videos and crap, if ONE little law suit got filed from some copyright holder somewhere.
However dumb or impractical store policy may be, do you really want to allow the lowliest employees to arbitrate, to have the power to override it? I don't think any theatre manager would want their ushers just taking it upon themselves to let unattended underage children in to see Rated R movies, even if most people think it isn't that bad. The point is, it's not the usher's place to break policy.
Even if the shift leader never finds out ... or the assistant manager, or the department head, or the general manager, or the district manager, or the regional director, or the vice-president of operations, or the ...
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|