Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » When was the last day 35 MM was run in your building? (Page 7)

 
This topic comprises 11 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11 
 
Author Topic: When was the last day 35 MM was run in your building?
Ian Parfrey
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1049
From: Imbil Australia 26 deg 27' 42.66" S 152 deg 42' 23.40" E
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 12-10-2011 05:04 AM      Profile for Ian Parfrey   Email Ian Parfrey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Leo.

Actually Kangaroo is quite a nice and tasty meat. It has a strong 'gamey' flavour that some find too strong, but with a peppercorn sauce or similar, it is delicious.... and almost totally fat free.

Think venison but a bit stronger in flavour.

 |  IP: Logged

Christian Appelt
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 505
From: Frankfurt, Germany
Registered: Dec 2001


 - posted 12-10-2011 08:07 AM      Profile for Christian Appelt   Email Christian Appelt   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The original camera negative of DOCTOR STRANGELOVE could not be used for the restoration:

quote:

Through over-printing and damage created at the time of initial release, the negative of Stanley Kubrick’s Cold War black comedy DR. STRANGELOVE or: HOW I LEARNED TO STOP WORRYING AND LOVE THE BOMB was destroyed at the laboratory over forty years ago. This presentation will detail the history of the preservation aspects of the film, including the decision to digitally restore the film at Cineric, Inc., a New York laboratory that specializes in film restoration.
Chemical stains, scratches and dirt were either printed into, or physically embedded into, all existing film elements. After examination and testing, it was determined the best elements for the restoration were a 35mm fine-grain master positive, a 35mm duplicate negative and a 35mm print. Each element represented a different manufacturing generation from the original camera negative, resulting in wide variations in density and contrast. It was felt that the only way to restore the film correctly, given the many different elements, their poor condition, and the need to maintain the filmmakers’ aesthetic intentions, was to use a complete 4K digital workflow.

from Strangelove Restored

So the heavy grain and/or noise in the restored version are not from original photography but rather from accumulated intermediate printing (build up of grain and contrast).

Robert Harris has discussed the STRANGELOVE restoration work here:

A Few Word About Dr Strangelove

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 12-12-2011 11:52 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks - I saw a presentation that Grover Crisp gave on the project a couple of years ago and thought he referred to scanning the o-negs, but clearly misremembered.

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Mehocic
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 804
From: New Castle, PA, USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-31-2012 09:16 PM      Profile for Aaron Mehocic   Email Aaron Mehocic   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
9:55 PM showing of The Hunger Games on March 27, 2012. The final audience consisted of only three girls about college freshman age.

After 21 years, I plan to retire effective May 1.

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 04-01-2012 01:06 PM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Let's see... The last time we ran 35mm was... Yesterday.

Our 3pm Saturday matinee was "Young Frankenstein" - and the print was mostly great - a little bit of damage at the head of Reel-1 and a few splices in Reel-6.

As far as the whole 4K discussion goes, I think the largest screens could benefit from the increased resolution. But, for the average size screens, I don't think 2K is being magnified enough for most people to notice. I'm starting to buy into the HFR idea a little more these days. That would benefit everybody. 4K won't. (That's right - I said that out loud.)

Another point in favor of HFR is that the existing equipment should be able to handle it already.

 |  IP: Logged

Per Hauberg
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 883
From: Malling, Denmark
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 04-16-2012 09:26 AM      Profile for Per Hauberg   Author's Homepage   Email Per Hauberg   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Screen 1: Digital from 03.03.2011
Two 35mm screenings for local school since then - And that's that. Last 70mm summer 2000 (Out of Africa reissue)
DP70 #2 out march 2011 to make room for the Kinoton DCP.
DP70 #1 and platter still there, running five minutes every day, but not for long.
Screen 2: 39 seats - never able to return the digi-money.
Still running 35mm om Kinoton FP30D and platter - and now and then BluRay. Will keep on doing so, as long as prints are available. -Not for long, I'm afraid.
The Lottery will decide the future of of the small screen.
Right now in screen 2: Iron Lady, Larry Crowne and Extremely High...
Small houses in Denmark ZERO VPF !

Per

 |  IP: Logged

Richard May
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1057
From: Floral Park, NY USA
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted 04-17-2012 10:25 AM      Profile for Richard May   Email Richard May   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Still running film on all screens.....

 |  IP: Logged

Dennis Benjamin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1445
From: Denton, MD
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 04-17-2012 01:19 PM      Profile for Dennis Benjamin   Author's Homepage   Email Dennis Benjamin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Still 35mm where I'm at.

We 'change over' in May.

35mm world wide is currently on life support, but is about to die commercially. R.I.P. to my friend of 22 years...

 |  IP: Logged

Gracia L. Babbidge
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 709
From: Bowdoin, Maine
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 05-09-2012 05:20 PM      Profile for Gracia L. Babbidge   Author's Homepage   Email Gracia L. Babbidge   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We're still playing 35mm at the Eveningstar, usually doing changeovers.

This week is a tad different, trailers on film, "The Kid With A Bike" on BluRay... [uhoh]

On Friday, it will be "Bully" on film, supposedly arriving half an hour before our first scheduled show of the day - if that is true, the show can start on-time, no problem. Huzzah for being reel to reel! [thumbsup]

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-09-2012 05:30 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Kid With a Bike should be 35mm. I ran it back in October. Not sure why you have it on Blu-Ray. Excellent film.

 |  IP: Logged

Gracia L. Babbidge
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 709
From: Bowdoin, Maine
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 05-09-2012 05:45 PM      Profile for Gracia L. Babbidge   Author's Homepage   Email Gracia L. Babbidge   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I really have no idea why we didn't get it on 35mm. I think that because we can do BluRay if necessary, it can facilitate us getting a title sooner, from time to time.

 |  IP: Logged

Rick Raskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1100
From: Manassas Virginia
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 05-09-2012 06:41 PM      Profile for Rick Raskin   Email Rick Raskin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I can remember some films arriving so close to showtime that the first reel was on the screen as I was inspecting the second.

 |  IP: Logged

Victor Liorentas
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 800
From: london ontario canada
Registered: May 2009


 - posted 05-09-2012 06:45 PM      Profile for Victor Liorentas   Email Victor Liorentas   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Me too! Many times during my carbon arc 20 min changeover years.

 |  IP: Logged

Lyle Romer
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1400
From: Davie, FL, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 05-10-2012 05:47 AM      Profile for Lyle Romer   Email Lyle Romer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Manny Knowles
As far as the whole 4K discussion goes, I think the largest screens could benefit from the increased resolution. But, for the average size screens, I don't think 2K is being magnified enough for most people to notice.
I disagree 100%. No matter the screen size, every time I watch something on a 2k projector and sit between 1/3 and 1/2 way back I see jaggies every time text is on the screen. It is very noticeable. When I see 2k content run on a 4k projector I don't see any of this. Honestly, 2k content run on a 4k projector looks as good or better to me than a 35mm print where a 2k Digital Intermediate was used. 2k is not "good enough", 4k probably is.

 |  IP: Logged

Victor Liorentas
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 800
From: london ontario canada
Registered: May 2009


 - posted 05-10-2012 11:56 AM      Profile for Victor Liorentas   Email Victor Liorentas   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think of 2k as good for a home theater! [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 11 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.