Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Paramount kills off 35mm in the US (Page 4)

 
This topic comprises 13 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  ...  11  12  13 
 
Author Topic: Paramount kills off 35mm in the US
Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 12-28-2013 12:28 PM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Kraus
Even if someone is offering prints your pickings will be slim. Of course you only have two screens to keep busy so your booker may be counting on still being able to find a couple of worthy titles for a while longer.
One of the last first run 35mm theatres in my area is having a very difficult time obtaining 35mm bookings, in some circumstances it is on a case by case basis. Paramount rejected bookings for both Anchorman 2 and Wolf of Wall Street at this location. Warner had no problem booking a 35mm of The Hobbit DOS but it was difficult at first and a three week commitment was mandatory.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 12-28-2013 12:41 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It could very well be that they will do this quietly, saying we don't have a 35mm print for *you* as opposed to we aren't making 35mm prints at all. They could say something like "Making prints and how many is decided on a film by film basis. We're not putting anyone out of business just because we didn't make prints on this title."

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 12-28-2013 12:46 PM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve, this is exactly what they have been doing to the theatres that I routinely deal with. Warner is booking based on past performance numbers in most cases, Paramount can be impossible.

I know of a second run theatre that was running a 35mm print of "This is the end", the theatre installed a digital projector on a Friday after the movie had opened and on the following Sunday Colombia Pictures politely asked for their 35mm print to be broken down and a DCP was issued.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 12-28-2013 03:33 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Which makes perfect sense. If you now have digital capability and the next guy they still have at least one possible booking location that doesn't, they'd take that print and send it to the next guy instead of tying it up at your location.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 12-28-2013 05:59 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"It ended with a whimper and not a bang."

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Cox
Film God

Posts: 2234
From: Melville Saskatchewan Canada
Registered: Apr 2011


 - posted 12-28-2013 06:16 PM      Profile for Frank Cox   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Cox   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
loud bangs in the projection room are generally bad. [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 12-28-2013 08:06 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Kraus
They could say something like "Making prints and how many is decided on a film by film basis...
Which is probably what they are actually doing, balancing the quotes for print runs that labs are giving them against their likely earning power in the remaining pool of 35mm houses that want to book and play them. As the cost of a print increases and the remaining potential revenue from 35mm houses diminishes, more and more of those film by film decisions will go against striking prints, sadly.

 |  IP: Logged

Jock Blakley
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 218
From: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Registered: Oct 2011


 - posted 12-29-2013 06:11 PM      Profile for Jock Blakley   Email Jock Blakley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Terry Lynn-Stevens
I know of a second run theatre that was running a 35mm print of "This is the end", the theatre installed a digital projector on a Friday after the movie had opened and on the following Sunday Colombia Pictures politely asked for their 35mm print to be broken down and a DCP was issued.
We're experiencing the same thing even in our repertory programming. Paramount in particular won't even consider letting us show a print if a DCP is available, regardless of the title and regardless of the quality of the DCP.

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Riley
Film Handler

Posts: 52
From: New Jersey
Registered: Apr 2010


 - posted 12-29-2013 10:53 PM      Profile for Michael Riley   Email Michael Riley       Edit/Delete Post 
Does Regal or AMC still operate locations that run 35mm? I know both companes were in the process of shutting down locations that they deemed weren't worth the investment in converting digital, but if there's any locations that they don't want to convert, but can't close due to pre existing contracts or leases, there will still be SOME 35mm available.

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 12-29-2013 11:44 PM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Michael Riley
Does Regal or AMC still operate locations that run 35mm?
The last AMC movie theatre in Ontario Canada still runs 35mm. It is slated to close in 2014 once the lease is up. The theatre was running two digital 3D projectors but recently they removed them and two 35mm projectors were reinstalled at this location. The theatre is a second run house with the odd first run print.

This theatre was originally a 30 screen complex however, one half of the theatre and the centre part of the complex were boarded up and the theatre now operates as a 12 plex on one side only.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-30-2013 02:15 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
I know of a second run theatre that was running a 35mm print of "This is the end",
Really?! The Last Picture Show.

 |  IP: Logged

Jason McMillan
Film Handler

Posts: 68
From: Houston, TX, USA
Registered: Dec 2009


 - posted 12-30-2013 10:11 AM      Profile for Jason McMillan   Email Jason McMillan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Michael Riley
Does Regal or AMC still operate locations that run 35mm?
AMC Loews Spring 10 in Houston is still film, but we're expecting it to close soon. There hasn't been an official notification or anything, but no one has put a dime into this theatre in years. Personally, I think they're just riding the lease out.

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 12-30-2013 12:01 PM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Frank Angel
Really?! The Last Picture Show.
The theatre still gets the odd release in 35mm, nothing from Hollywood anymore. The rare 35mm is usually a foreign or independent film.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-18-2014 12:53 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
End of film: Paramount first studio to stop distributing film prints

By Richard Verrier

January 17, 2014, 3:47 p.m.

quote:


In a historic step for Hollywood, Paramount Pictures has become the first major studio to stop releasing movies on film in the United States.

Paramount recently notified theater owners that the Will Ferrell comedy “Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues,” which opened in December, would be the last movie that would it would release on 35-millimeter film.

The studio’s Oscar-nominated film “The Wolf of Wall Street” from director Martin Scorsese is the first major studio film that was released all digitally, according to theater industry executives who were briefed on the plans but not authorized to speak about them.

The decision is significant because it is likely to encourage other studios to follow suit, accelerating the complete phase-out of film, possibly by the end of the year. That would mark the end of an era: film has been the medium for the motion picture industry for more than a century.
“It’s of huge significance,” said Jan-Christopher Horak, director of the UCLA Film & Television Archive. “For 120 years, film and 35 mm has been the format of choice for theatrical presentations. Now we’re seeing the end of that. I’m not shocked that it’s happened, but how quickly it has happened.”

A spokeswoman for Paramount was not available for comment.

Paramount has kept its decision under wraps, at least in Hollywood.

The reticence reflects the fact that no studio wants to be seen as the first to abandon film, which retains a cachet among some filmmakers. Some studios may also be reluctant to give up box-office revenue by bypassing theaters that can show only film. About 8% of U.S. movie theater screens are equipped to show movies only on film.

Other studios were expected to jump on the digital bandwagon first. 20th Century Fox sent a letter to exhibitors in 2011 saying it would stop distributing film “within the next year or two.” Disney issued a similar warning to theater operators. Last year, many industry watchers expected Lions Gate would make history with an all-digital November release of “The Hunger Games: Catching Fire.”

Paramount’s move comes nearly a decade after studios began working with exhibitors to help finance the replacement of film projectors with digital systems, which substantially reduce the cost of delivering movie prints to theaters.

In addition to relying on digital hard drives, theaters are installing satellite systems to digitally beam movies into cinemas. That could significantly lower the cost of delivering a single print, to less than $100 from as much $2,000.

Digital technology also enables cinemas to screen higher-priced 3-D films and makes it easier for them to book and program entertainment.

As a result, large chains have moved quickly to embrace digital technology: Ninety-two percent of 40,045 screens in the U.S. have converted to digital, according to the National Assn. of Theatre Owners.

"After more than 15 years of work, the movie industry has completed its migration from film to digital technologies," said John Fithian, president of the trade group. "The fact that major studios are now distributing movies domestically only in digital signals an historic transition to a new era. Digital cinema provides great benefit to our patrons, in the quality of the presentation, in the flexibility of programming, in 3D, in alternative content, and in so many other ways."

The dwindling number of film screens has made releasing movies on 35 mm less attractive, especially given the rising cost of film prints for major movies. Film print costs have been rising rapidly as suppliers have scaled back production.

Last month, Technicolor, the French-owned film processing and post-production company, closed a film lab in Glendale. That lab had replaced a much larger facility at Universal Studios that employed 360 workers until it closed in 2011. Also last year, Technicolor closed its Pinewood film lab in Britain.

The march to digital also puts further pressure on some small-town community theaters that have been struggling to finance the purchase of $70,000 digital projectors.

Those theaters are at risk of going out of business if they can no longer obtain film prints of movies. As of last year, about 1,000 independent theaters had not transitioned to digital. Some are turning to their communities to raise funds for digital equipment.

"The Wolf of Wall Street” would seem an unlikely choice for an all-digital wide release given that movie was partially shot on film and that Scorsese is a a passionate advocate for film preservation. What's more, he directed a movie that was a homage to the early days of film, the 2011 3-D movie "Hugo."

A spokesman for Scorsese said the director was traveling and not available for comment.



 |  IP: Logged

Justin Hamaker
Film God

Posts: 2253
From: Lakeport, CA USA
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 01-18-2014 03:45 AM      Profile for Justin Hamaker   Author's Homepage   Email Justin Hamaker   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
"The Wolf of Wall Street” would seem an unlikely choice for an all-digital wide release
I disagree with this sentiment. With a 3 hour running time, a 35mm print for Wolf of Wall Street probably costs about 50% more than for a more typical 90-120 minute movie. Given that the remaining 35mm theatres account for such a small percentage of the total gross, it makes perfect sense to go all digital on a release that would be more expensive than normal for 35mm.

I'm guessing Disney can't be far behind. The discount theatre 30 minutes away from my location still hasn't picked up Frozen, even though we had it off screen for 2 weeks (we brought it back on 1/10). This to me signals there must not be many 35mm prints of Frozen around. Normally this theatre picks up 35mm prints right after we take a movie off screen - typically in weeks 3-5. They also did not pick up Saving Mr. Banks when we dropped it.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 13 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  ...  11  12  13 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.