Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE
Topic Closed  Topic Closed


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Upload your random pictures (Page 37)

 
This topic comprises 101 pages: 1  2  3  ...  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  ...  99  100  101 
 
Author Topic: Upload your random pictures
Phil Hill
I love my cootie bug

Posts: 7595
From: Hollywood, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 10-06-2003 11:02 PM      Profile for Phil Hill   Email Phil Hill       Edit/Delete Post 
So Mike...Great pic of you in the child seat....

>>> Phil

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 10-07-2003 08:43 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mike's Splash Mountain photo courtesy of Kodak:

http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,11712,00.html
quote:

Amusement Acquisition: a Kodak Moment

Randolph Court

03:23 PM Apr. 16, 1998 PT

You're strapped into a hollowed-out log about to drop 50 feet straight into the water. With your hair standing on end and your jaw in your lap, your face becomes a portrait of exhilaration, panic, and motion sickness. Best of all, it's on film –- cameras installed on thrill rides at theme parks from Disneyland's Splash Mountain to the looping Great Bear at Hershey Park in Pennsylvania catch you mid-ride and then sell your pictures for about US$10 so you can remember that moment forever.

Now the folks in Rochester, New York, want to make that a Kodak moment. Hoping to bolster a little corner of its vast -– but struggling -- US$14.5 billion imaging empire, Eastman Kodak Co. said Wednesday that it acquired Rave Reviews Innovative Concessions Inc. and Rave Reviews of Canada for an undisclosed sum. The two affiliated companies design and install photographic systems for thrill rides and other image-related businesses in theme parks.

"It's one more indication that we're very enthusiastic about this business -- and that we intend to be a leader in it for the long term," said Doug Pileri, general manager of Kodak's "themed entertainment" business, in a statement. "Current parks are expanding. New ones are being built. All of them provide great channels for our expanding variety of Kodak's entertainment-imaging products."

Kodak also posted first quarter profits of $225 million on Wednesday, up 50 percent from the $149 million of a year ago. But that success followed a year in which the world's largest maker of photographic film announced it would have to slash its payroll by 16,000 workers in a bid to shed $1 billion in costs. It has been suffering losses in part due to stiff competition from Fuji Photo Film of Japan.

But Kodak is not wasting its energy in a stubborn bid to hold on to its eroding share of the consumer print market. Instead, the company has been turning its sights to new markets, like digital imaging, where it saw somewhat encouraging signs this quarter -- that business improved from a loss of $140 million in last year's first quarter to a loss of only $55 million this quarter.

Kodak’s entertainment-imaging division, which includes its motion-picture film business, showed increased sales from 1996 to 1997. One part of entertainment imaging is the themed entertainment business, which provides imaging products and services to theme parks, studio-owned retail ventures, movie theaters, and the like. That's where Rave Reviews fits in.

Kodak said the Rave companies will be dissolved and integrated into the rest of the themed entertainment businesses operated under Kodak's entertainment-imaging division, which is working on a whole range of newfangled variations on the photography business. That means stuff like sticker photos, fantasy theaters that allow you to superimpose an image of yourself into any scene you want (say sliding into home plate in a major league baseball game), and dynamic imaging technologies that make it possible to put a few seconds of full-motion video onto a trading card.

Kodak has also developed its own still-photo system for the thrill ride market. Rave Reviews also developed a video system, but that's not the reason Kodak bought the company, according to Mark Stolper, director of strategic alliances and portfolio management for Kodak's Entertainment Imaging businesses.

"The purpose of purchasing [Rave Reviews] was not a tech play," Stolper said. "It was more of a distribution play."

Stolper said theme parks have been signing long-term contracts with little imaging companies like Rave Reviews and RX Technology to provide the thrill-ride photography system for individual rides. Rave Reviews claimed 40 installations in six theme parks in the United States and Canada.

And the photos seem to be popular. People apparently love to be caught in the act of doing whatever they do in that moment of wild surrender: whether they scream, cry, or take off their clothes. A number of young women apparently prefer the latter, as the Flash Mountain site has chronicled.

By buying Rave Reviews. Kodak immediately lands 40 installations in six theme parks -- including four Paramount Parks -- where Rave Reviews has established itself.

"It helps us build the thrill-ride photography business we're already in, and it allows us to expand our distribution system to provide other added- value Kodak products, such as sticker kiosks, and fantasy theaters," said Stolper.

Stolper said it is too soon to know how big the thrill-ride photography business will be in the United States, but he pointed optimistically to the successes of other new businesses elsewhere. Sticker kiosks, which are just catching on in the United States, are already a US$1 billion a year business in Japan.


 |  IP: Logged

Rachel Craven
Madam Moderator

Posts: 2190
From: Pensacola, FL
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 10-07-2003 06:25 PM      Profile for Rachel Craven   Email Rachel Craven   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Nice pic Scott!

GO SOX!!!

 |  IP: Logged

Jason Black
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1723
From: Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 10-08-2003 08:14 PM      Profile for Jason Black   Author's Homepage   Email Jason Black   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I present to you...

Mr. & Mrs. Jason A. Black
Married 10-04-03.

 -

Below is a better, (nearly) full-body shot.

 -

[ 10-09-2003, 09:03 AM: Message edited by: Jason Black ]

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Hill
I love my cootie bug

Posts: 7595
From: Hollywood, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 10-08-2003 08:17 PM      Profile for Phil Hill   Email Phil Hill       Edit/Delete Post 
Jason, great pics! Congrats!

(The look in your eyes in the 2nd pic is priceless!) [beer] [Razz] [evil]

>>> Phil

 |  IP: Logged

Jason Black
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1723
From: Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 10-08-2003 09:58 PM      Profile for Jason Black   Author's Homepage   Email Jason Black   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Snapped this shot of one of nature oddities while out and about the other day. His name is 'One Eye Jack', which, after all, seems rather appropriate given the situation. He seems to be relatively tame, for a squirrel. He loves peanuts!

 -

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 10-09-2003 10:32 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jason: Congratulations on your marriage! Betsy and I just celebrated 31 years (October 7, 1972). [thumbsup]

 |  IP: Logged

Rachel Craven
Madam Moderator

Posts: 2190
From: Pensacola, FL
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 10-09-2003 11:00 AM      Profile for Rachel Craven   Email Rachel Craven   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Congrats Jason and John! [thumbsup]

 |  IP: Logged

Jason Black
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1723
From: Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 10-09-2003 04:07 PM      Profile for Jason Black   Author's Homepage   Email Jason Black   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John...

Congrats.. [thumbsup]

Phil & Rachel & John,

Thanks.. [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Rachel Craven
Madam Moderator

Posts: 2190
From: Pensacola, FL
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 10-10-2003 12:51 AM      Profile for Rachel Craven   Email Rachel Craven   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Tell your wife congrats too, that dress (from what I can see) is beautiful!

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 10-13-2003 06:53 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Congrats to those who can rope them in and those who can hold on to them.

---

Conventional wisdom: Large format films are always edited via 35mm reduction prints.

 -

 -

Not necessarily! [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-13-2003 07:16 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Is that a 15/70 Steenbeck clone? Ummm....why? What's wrong with conforming 15/65 neg to 4/35 workprint?

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 10-13-2003 07:45 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually that is a KEM which runs 70/5 or 70/8. But they do indeed make a 70/15 unit too:

 -

 -

 |  IP: Logged

Josh Jones
Redhat

Posts: 1207
From: Plano, TX
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 10-18-2003 04:01 PM      Profile for Josh Jones   Author's Homepage   Email Josh Jones   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Belated congrats Jason [thumbsup]

By the way, how do those flat bed editors work? do they use a rotating prism like the cheap editor I worked with?

Josh

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 10-18-2003 04:12 PM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, congratulations!

Btw, I thought most everything these days is done on an Avid or FCP?

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 101 pages: 1  2  3  ...  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  ...  99  100  101 
 
   Open Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.