|
|
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Upload your random pictures (part 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bill Enos
Film God

Posts: 2081
From: Richmond, Virginia, USA
Registered: Apr 2000
|
posted 07-22-2008 08:48 PM
Look at the fuel mileage ratings, pretty good but certainly not what would be expected for such a tiny car. Problem is it weighs almost 1700 lbs. Not cheap either $16,000 or more with the fully loaded version around $21,000. A friend drove one and said the ride was extremely rough and the transmission was wierd. He said the most he would pay for it would be $300.00.
Being made by Daimler, it'll probably be troublesome and very expensive to repair.
In the photo link here it survived a wreck where it could be booted away, how would it do as the middle vehicle in a 3 vehicle rearender, or in a case where it had to absorb the impact. If you look hard enough, there is a photo out there of one of the very early ('98 or '99) Smarts after an insurance institute test, collapsed like an egg. They've made it a lot stronger.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|