|
|
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Gas Prices in your area
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 05-22-2008 05:52 AM
quote: Mike Blakesley I listen quite often to Bruce Williams (talk show host, financial advisor) -- he thinks we'll see $6.00 per gallon in the next two years.
My prediction is that it will double within 2-3 years, and reach $25 per gallon within ten years. I don't think it will be the end of the world as we know it. People will make less long journeys, they will walk more for short ones, as they used to. We are just going to have to get used to the idea of energy being expensive. There will be more incentive for improved efficiency, We'll see more of waste heat recovery from air conditioning systems and industrial processes, and that sort of thing. Plastics are also going to get a lot more expensive too, and we're going to see a lot more recycling of them, which is really only just starting to happen now.
I also think we will have a lot less of things like strawberries in the middle of winter, as we can get now, as the cost of flying them half way round the world, or growing them under controlled conditions becomes too great, but we never used to have them all year round, and life wasn't too terrible then.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 05-22-2008 06:12 AM
My guess on this is somewhere between Stephen's and Bobby's. At the core of the issue is this: are we dealing with a commodity price bubble of a similar sort to the recent house price bubble in the US and Britain (and, more to the point, will it go pop in the same way?), or is the underlying cause of this Peak Oil?
If the former, then I guess we're in for another one of the boom and bust cycles which have characterised developed economies since the Industrial Revolution, with the rapidly developing economies of China and India changing the details and timing to a certain extent.
But if Peak Oil has arrived (and I find OPEC's 'we won't pump more oil' statements a tad suspicious - won't or can't?), then the goalposts have been permanently moved. We'll have to use existing energy sources more efficiently, and develop newer and more renewable ones. During the era of cheap fossil fuels, it simply wasn't cost effective to do the latter - it was far cheaper to pump the energy we needed out of the ground, and then to use it in a relatively inefficient way. If that's no longer the case, I agree with Stephen that there are going to be big changes in all of our lives in the coming years and decades. All that's up for debate is the how and the when.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 05-24-2008 09:33 AM
Stephen,
I would highly doubt that gas will hit $25/gallon (in the States). It would shut down this country...which is the sort of thing that wars are made of.
This country is rather spread out and has always pushed the transportation of the day. The very nature of States as individual sovern entities within a common "united" collective is, at the root, how this country runs. Without transportation by road/air...etc in an economical fashion will kill not only the economic infrastructure but the whole way of life. $25/gallon based on current income levels (or even rosy projected income levels 10-years from now), would effectively strand people and kill them.
At $3.00/$4.00 per gallon it is already showing its affect on our economy entertainment businesses have already felt its affects. How many miles does the average American drive in a week? For me, it is in the hundreds, just to get to/from work (not the miles at work, in a company vehicle). Call it 300-miles for me. My vehicle seems to get about 30miles/gallon or about 10-gallons a week. That is $250/week or $13,000/year for gas at $25.00 a gallon. For some, it would be notably more...for some a bit less but either way...rather parallizing. Then again, at those gas rates...most won't be able to go to the theatre so my income to drop to make things even more dire.
In a day when people still talk about the difference of a few pennies over a loaf of bread, the difference of 300-400% in a gallon of gas to get that loaf of bread would seem to finanically kill the shopper (note, the loaf of bread would also go up in price more than pennies since the transporation costs of getting it to market would also go up 300-400%).
Steve
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 05-24-2008 02:09 PM
I believe the US must get more passenger rail systems built and have more bus service running in other areas. Unfortunately this country has a lot of challenges when it comes to mass transit.
The United States can't seem to get a public transportation system built these days without it turning into some corrupted, cost-overrun infected boondoggle. I find it amazing this country had so many passenger rail lines 100 years ago. It would be impossible to provide that level of service today.
Countries in Europe and Asia are better able to get mass transit systems built since their population densities are so much higher. They don't have to build as many miles of track. At the peak of America's rail system, it had over 200,000 miles of track. Now we have the property of a lot of former rail lines being converted into trails and bike paths -if they're not covered up by housing development and other stuff.
Then there's the matter of the "car culture" in the United States. Americans love traveling in their own vehicles wherever they want and do so on their own schedule.
quote: Steve Guttag I would highly doubt that gas will hit $25/gallon (in the States). It would shut down this country...which is the sort of thing that wars are made of.
I'm a little foggy history, but didn't we have an oil embargo running against the Japanese empire in 1941? Isn't that one of the factors that pushed their military into bombing Pearl Harbor?
If gasoline shot up to $25 per gallon, or even $10 a gallon any time soon it would cause a hell of a lot of political crisis. The US dollar would need a lot of inflation/devaluation along with workers having their pay increased a lot to make up for all that inflation for $10 per gallon or $25 per gallon gasoline to keep from starting wars, causing famine, etc.
One thing I'm holding out hope that will happen is these high prices will force a much more aggressive, faster conversion to cars that run on fuels other than gasoline. American car companies are losing billions of dollars doing business as usual. Airlines are in a state of crisis. Ethanol is a big scam and costly distraction from doing something that will be truly effective in getting this country off the oil tit. Whether we need to be driving electric cars, cars that run on hydrogen fuel cells or whatever, this country seriously needs to get on the ball to converting to that within the next 10 years, if not sooner. Sticking with gasoline is just going to cause this country more and more trouble.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 05-26-2008 05:02 AM
I'm not sure that direct comparisons between European and US petrol prices are that helpful, because a much larger proportion of the European retail price is tax (currently 81% for petrol in Britain, against a European average of around 60%). Perversely, this cushions the blow when the price of the actual liquid goes up, because the overall price we pay for it increases a lot less, proportionally.
I dread to think how much a high speed rail link across America (using similar technology to France's TGV and Japan's Shikansen) would cost - the thought reminds me of the scene in The Iron Horse in which President Lincoln signs the railroad bill, sightly nervous of what a huge project it represented. If the money could be found, I guess it would be possible to build a rail link that could take you from New York to Los Angeles in one long day (15 hours or so). But even the Channel Tunnel rail link (55 miles or so) cost £2 billion here. Multiply the cost of that over 3,000 miles, and the only possible way I can see of making it happen would be to impose European levels of taxation on road fuel. Given that the average American has to travel much longer distances routinely than the average European, that would impose massive hardship.
I'd also be interested to know how the energy input needed to take a TGV-type train across America would compare with that of a 747 or an A380 (which carries around the same number of passengers) making the same trip.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|