Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Upload your random pictures (part 4) (Page 31)

 
This topic comprises 65 pages: 1  2  3  ...  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  ...  63  64  65 
 
Author Topic: Upload your random pictures (part 4)
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 03-09-2012 10:30 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Cheated a little to bump the "NOT IT!" thread. Honestly, I really do not want to see A Thousand Words. I'd rather write "a thousand words" a thousand times than see that movie.

 |  IP: Logged

Edward Havens
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 614
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Mar 2008


 - posted 03-10-2012 12:01 AM      Profile for Edward Havens   Email Edward Havens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What do you expect of a movie that was shot in April of 2008 but not released until March 2012?

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 03-10-2012 08:59 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Kind of surprised that movie just didn't go straight to home video release.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-10-2012 09:52 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
They were probably hoping to capture whatever Eddie Murphy "buzz" that would have been generated by his Oscar hosting gig.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-10-2012 02:14 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
He hosted the Oscars? Awesome.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Cox
Film God

Posts: 2234
From: Melville Saskatchewan Canada
Registered: Apr 2011


 - posted 03-25-2012 07:30 PM      Profile for Frank Cox   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Cox   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
 -

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-25-2012 08:40 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Taken with Hipstermatic, only available for the iPhone. Not sure why people love apps like that.

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-25-2012 09:34 PM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It's a sign of the times.

The whole "retro" thing seems to be an odd mix of a yearning for nostalgia mixed with acceptance of superficial representations of the things from a bygone era.

I guess it's a kind-of "escapism" -- not wanting to be "here and now" but okay with using "here and now" technology to have a pseudo-experience of something else. In this case, an attempt to recreate the past.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-25-2012 10:56 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I see it as something much more simple: "My pictures have absolutely nothing interesting and I can't take decent pictures so I need to add stuff to them to make them at least somewhat visually interesting."

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Cox
Film God

Posts: 2234
From: Melville Saskatchewan Canada
Registered: Apr 2011


 - posted 03-27-2012 02:49 AM      Profile for Frank Cox   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Cox   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
After being sent just that photo the other day, I now found an actual news article about it. The article also includes a better quality photo.

News Article

quote:
At least in Chilliwack, police officers disguised as panhandlers have become the B.C. RCMP’s newest tool in cracking down on distracted driving.

Earlier this month, RCMP Const. Bryan Martell appeared at a Chilliwack-area intersection dressed in a hooded jacket and ball cap – and sporting a few day’s growth of beard.

Wandering alongside stopped vehicles he carried a cardboard sign reading “Hello, my name is Constable Martell. If you’re on your cell phone right now, you are about to get a ticket.”

If he spotted a driver texting talking on his cell phone, Cst. Martell radioed ahead to a uniformed officer who would then ticket the vehicle.

As a result of the one-day blitz, officers handed out 21 tickets and gave out countless verbal warnings, RCMP traffic officials told the Chilliwack Times.

Since February, 2010, British Columbians have been barred from using any sort of handheld electronic device while driving.

As of September, 2011, the legislation had generated nearly 50,000 tickets and according to the B.C. government, has saved 16 lives.

In July, 2011, a distracted Chilliwack RCMP officer was to blame for a head-on crash that killed a 20-year-old.


 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-27-2012 03:48 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Ok, so this law has supposedly saved 16 lives. How exactly do they calculate that? Does one of these guys have a Delorean and a Mr. Fusion? I'm going to call bullshit on that one. Its nothing more than an easy way to generate income.

So if 50,000 tickets were issued to save 16 lives, how many lives have been saved by the TSA spending millions of taxpayer's dollars and terrorizing US citizens all for a false sense of security to make the stupid feel better? Oh yeah, none.

It all makes sense now.

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-27-2012 01:02 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The population of British Columbia is 4.1 million.
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=polulation+of+british+columbia

In 2009, the death rate of B.C. was 17.3 per 10,000 residents. (.173 percent.)
http://www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/coroners/publications/docs/annualreport2009.pdf

The number of people who died in motor vehicle accidents (as per the above report) was 1423. (27% of all deaths.)

Assuming that the police chief's estimate that 16 lives were saved as a result of his tactics are true, he reduced the overall number of deaths in British Columbia by 1.1%. It reduced the overall death rate by a small fraction of 1%.

Further, in his own report, the coroner states the following:
quote:
Rural areas in many jurisdictions have higher MVI fatality rates than urban areas. Suggested causal factors include:
•greater proportion of highway travel
•longer emergency response times
•greater distance to medical facilities.

It seems that the government could do more to prevent deaths by motor vehicle accident if it bought more ambulances and built more hospitals. Don't you think?

Of all motor vehicle deaths in 2009, 112 of them were drug and/or alcohol related.

Don't you think the police could do more to prevent motor vehicle deaths if, instead of paying cops to dress up like homeless people, they increased the number of D.U.I. checkpoints?

Even if you assume that all of the police chief's statistics are correct, the number of deaths prevented per dollar spent is way out of whack.

They handed out 21 tickets as a result of this campaign. Assuming a fine of $100 per ticket, that amounts to $2,100 collected in fines.

What is a police officer's salary? How many man-hours were spent on this project? What was the total cost of this?

I'm willing to bet that they spent way more than $2,100 to do this, pulling police officers off other duties where their time would be put to more productive use and possibly saving other lives.

They could have done more good by spending the money somewhere else.

This whole project amounts to nothing more than a circle jerk by your elected officials.

Why are people so fucking stupid that they accept this kind of mental masturbation?

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-27-2012 04:21 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think trying to read the teeny-tiny text on his sign while driving would be more dangerous than driving while on the phone.

Also, his sign does not specify that I need to be driving, so could he issue me a ticket if I'm just walking by?

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Cox
Film God

Posts: 2234
From: Melville Saskatchewan Canada
Registered: Apr 2011


 - posted 03-27-2012 04:34 PM      Profile for Frank Cox   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Cox   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think that, as a stunt, it's not a bad one. Stuff like this is intended to be a consciousness-raising exercise, not a money-maker. They got news headlines and publicity out of it.

A lot of policing comes down to what you don't see. You rarely hear people discussing how they didn't get mugged that day, for example. I recognize that in some ways this is like the famous tiger-repelling rock* but now people who see a homeless person by the side of the road will wonder if it's really a cop ready to nab them for distracted driving.

I think it's self-evident that distracted driving is hazardous. Fiddling with cell phones is up there with changing the 8-track in your Charger. The difference and reason that I can see for the focus on cell phones is that the distraction is more frequent, longer-lasting and currently far more common than many other things that you could be doing while driving.

Policing isn't supposed to operate on a cost-recovery basis, and I think most of us would agree that trying to do it that way would be a bad thing.

* MOE: "I have here a rock that repels tigers!" JOE: "How do you know that it actually works?" MOE: "Do you see any tigers around here?"

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-28-2012 02:54 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
While it is dangerous to do anything that takes your eyes off the road, I think it's far MORE dangerous to be texting than doing things like, say, changing radio stations.

If you are fiddling with your car stereo, it's kind of a mindless activity. But when you're texting, you're kind of in a dream state because you're having to concentrate on what you're writing. In other words you can change radio stations while still thinking about driving, but you really can't do that with texting.

If I was running things, the penalty for the first offense of texting while driving would be a big fine, plus confiscation of the phone and cancellation of your cellphone account for at least a year.

Talking while driving is bad too, but at least you can still keep your eyes on the road while doing it. For that, I'd make the penalty less severe....say, suspension of your cellphone account for three months plus a fine.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 65 pages: 1  2  3  ...  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  ...  63  64  65 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.