Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Hey you, you suck! (AKA: Outing bad film handlers) Part 2 (Page 47)

 
This topic comprises 51 pages: 1  2  3  ...  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51 
 
Author Topic: Hey you, you suck! (AKA: Outing bad film handlers) Part 2
Robert John Jeromson
Master Film Handler

Posts: 264
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Registered: Jul 2004


 - posted 02-01-2012 03:53 AM      Profile for Robert John Jeromson   Email Robert John Jeromson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: David Buckley
Yup, pristine, right up the bit where Jennifer and Marty are ascending the school stairs, and then the image freezes for about five seconds
Bummer [Frown]

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Cassedy
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1661
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Dec 2006


 - posted 02-01-2012 04:16 AM      Profile for Jim Cassedy   Email Jim Cassedy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Joe Redifer
If you're in charge of projecting an
image on your shift, you're the projectionist.

Putting a piano in the booth and asking me
to play it during my shift wouldn't make a pianist.

 |  IP: Logged

Kenneth Wuepper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1026
From: Saginaw, MI, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 02-01-2012 07:03 AM      Profile for Kenneth Wuepper   Email Kenneth Wuepper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jim,

What a great analogy!

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-01-2012 10:50 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
That's because in the analogy the job is to MOVE the piano, not play it. Someone who is responsible for making sure the movies project an image IS the projectionist, regardless of their level of training.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-01-2012 11:48 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Maybe we need a new word. A person who just plays the movies is a projectionist, whereas a person who can take the system apart and put it back together again is a "projectionologist."

 |  IP: Logged

Edward Havens
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 614
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Mar 2008


 - posted 02-01-2012 11:54 AM      Profile for Edward Havens   Email Edward Havens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Presentation Monkey!

 |  IP: Logged

Kenneth Wuepper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1026
From: Saginaw, MI, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 02-01-2012 12:12 PM      Profile for Kenneth Wuepper   Email Kenneth Wuepper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The classic titles were:

Operator = threader button pusher

Projectionist = technical Skilled in details

Display Manager = Does it all

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-05-2012 04:43 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mike Blakesley
Maybe we need a new word.
In an SMPTE Projection Subcommittee where we were discussing the proposal for the 3 sprocket pull-down format (thankfully it wound up DOA), the rep from UA Theatres corrected me when I used the term "projectionist;" he said at UA Theatres they are "projection attendants." I looked over at the late and beloved John Pytlak who just rolled his eyes.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 02-05-2012 07:28 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Once "they" ran off the Pros, we just called them chimps. Very appropriate when you consider that sometimes they were just OK and sometimes they were destructive.

I knew we were in trouble when I had to start bringing 6-packs of rebuilt intermittents. (not kidding) Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Dennis Benjamin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1445
From: Denton, MD
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 02-16-2012 01:50 PM      Profile for Dennis Benjamin   Author's Homepage   Email Dennis Benjamin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If I EVER find out who was the IDIOT that handled print #03515 of "Hugo" before this film came to my theatre, I will personally pay them a 'visit' - regardless of what City, State, or Country they work in & whack them upside the head with a splicer! How dare you do this to a film!!!

In 22 years this is only the 2nd film that I received in this poor of shape. The other one - I didn't run. Technicolor won't tell me where it came from. After 2 1/2 hours I finally was able to figure out the heads and tails - which were all on the wrong reels. The person also condensed reels 4 & 5 to one reel. The scratches on this film were green & yellow - and the film was crinkled on the reels changes.

Thank you and have a nice day...

 |  IP: Logged

Victor Liorentas
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 800
From: london ontario canada
Registered: May 2009


 - posted 02-16-2012 02:20 PM      Profile for Victor Liorentas   Email Victor Liorentas   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I hear you Dennis!

 |  IP: Logged

David Buckley
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 525
From: Oxford, N. Canterbury, New Zealand
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted 02-16-2012 04:50 PM      Profile for David Buckley   Author's Homepage   Email David Buckley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm currently enjoying going to the cinema and watching lots of old movies, I've mentioned Back to the Future, The Matrix, got Ghostbusters last week and this week its Alien.

But whats really pissing me off is this is turning into an odyssey of film-done-really-badly-in-years-gone-by coming back to bite. I thought that the Matrix was bad, Ghostbusters was worse; you know its "noticable" when the whole audience cracks up as the movie head comes up battered to hell and back.

Still got Top Gun (yeah, I know you guys hate this one), Men In Black, Rocky Horror Picture Show (that's gonna be fun!), Close Encounters and Die Hard to go. Must write to them and try and get Demolition Man and True Lies added to the list [Smile]

But sadly, if there was ever a reason why the average cinema should be mandated by law to go digital, then this is it.

 |  IP: Logged

Jock Blakley
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 218
From: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Registered: Oct 2011


 - posted 02-16-2012 09:44 PM      Profile for Jock Blakley   Email Jock Blakley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
David, do you know if those rep prints are held in NZ or pooled with the Australian ones? I've had somebody suggest to me in the past that they come out an AU-NZ pool but I don't remember any such damage the print of THE MATRIX that we usually get.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-16-2012 09:55 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: David Buckley
True Lies
Ah,good memories there. It was our first movie in DTS digital sound. I watched it with my friend Keith to test out the system. During the first "shootout" scene, he hollered at me "Wow, this could even make a shitty movie fun to watch!"

Good movie, too.

 |  IP: Logged

David Buckley
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 525
From: Oxford, N. Canterbury, New Zealand
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted 02-19-2012 08:02 PM      Profile for David Buckley   Author's Homepage   Email David Buckley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The adventure continues...

Last night was Alien. Advertised start time was 8:00pm, but at twenty past we were all sitting on the carpet outside the auditorium. A cheery young thing appears and says they are having "projection problems" and they don't know when it'll be working.

Ten minutes later we're in and seated, the sconces dim out, and to a dark screen one hears the 20th Century Fox sting. A few seconds later, and the screen illuminates and we have titles.

It's almost immediately evident that this isn't a 35mm presentation. Not only the lack of print damage, but the obligatory stack of ads and trailers didn't appear, and with a plattered up print it's a bit hard to skip those elements.

Anyway, I digress. I can't stop looking at the line of text at the bottom of the screen in little print that says Copyright 1979 Fox blah blah blah. It's in small font, but it looks wrong; the widths of the sides of the letters weren't consistent, some thinner, some thicker. Just like you get with a data projector when the computer is set to a vastly different resolution to the projector, and the scaler tries to fix it. Looked wrong.

So I'm continuing to watch this movie, and it still doesn't look "right". I'm thinking that whoever did this transfer to digital cinema ought to reconsider his/her career choice.

And then the penny drops. I'm watching a DVD.

Eventually the credits crawl, and there's no lights and folks are unsteadily and en masse leaving, and eventually someone presses a button and the lights come up. Normally this is a job trusted to the automation, but there was little automated about this presentation.

So I'm amongst the last to leave, leaning on the wall on the way out, the titles finish, and we get the THX thing, followed by the copyright warning that this DVD is licenced for home viewing only.

So, either:

a) Whatever media they had Alien on couldn't be projected for some reason, and some enterprising individual scurried out to Blockbuster and rented the DVD and saved the show, or

b) They always planned to show the DVD, in which case this is cinema done [bs] If this really were the case this cinema would suck big time. Surely no-one tries to pass off DVD as a movie in anything but the tiniest auditoria?

Benefit of the doubt applies...

quote: Jock Blakley
David, do you know if those rep prints are held in NZ or pooled with the Australian ones?
I have no idea, other than to note that there is this place called the vault in Auckland, so I assume that's where prints are held in NZ.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 51 pages: 1  2  3  ...  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.