Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » Dolby's new sound system (Page 24)

 
This topic comprises 38 pages: 1  2  3  ...  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  ...  36  37  38 
 
Author Topic: Dolby's new sound system
Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 07-23-2013 06:29 PM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I was wondering: With that many potential speakers and that many wiring and amps taking up rack space, wouldn't an active system with some kind of digital bus start to make sense?

 |  IP: Logged

David Zylstra
Master Film Handler

Posts: 432
From: Novi, MI, USA
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 07-23-2013 09:21 PM      Profile for David Zylstra   Email David Zylstra   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dolby has a digital network link ("Dolby Atmos Connect") - they use it to connect the CP850 to the DAC3201 units and it can be used to connect to amplifiers or other devices with the same network protocol.

"Dolby Atmos Connect" is a loop where the devices daisy chain together with the first and last in the loop connecting back to the processor - very similar to (or the same as) BLU Link.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 07-23-2013 11:29 PM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
Atmos does allow for five speaker towers/channels behind the screen. Whether anyone bothers to wire for that is another matter. I wonder if Dolby is pushing theaters who install Atmos to also use a baffle sound wall behind the screen.

In addition to supporting the LC and RC stage channels, the two rows of ceiling surrounds and extra side wall surround speakers closer to the screen would seem to add the capability of putting a lot more audio detail up front. With that configuration it's possible for certain sound elements to seem like they're floating in front of the screen. Sound elements can track far left or far right just off the screen more smoothly. With a standard 5.1 setup if you have a audio tracking effect going into the surrounds there's a kind of "snap" effect of the audio having to shoot over that big gap between the stage speakers and surround array. Dolby Atmos fills in that gap.

I know that I'm a broken record on this topic, but if Atmos can fill in the missing gap of LC/RC channel sound - fine, but I've not read one thing about the archiving of the five front channel mixes of classic pre-1977 70mm features (or 8-channel SDDS mixes) for DCP encoding/theatrical presentation. The aspect of sound seems to be so focused on surround sound, height, overhead - it unfortunately seems to be eliminating classic movie mixes that used directional dialogue and music that benefited from two additional channels of sound originating from behind the screen. as far as I am concerned every studio that released musicals, dramas in 70mm that had five front channel mixing, the DCP's should mirror what was heard in it's original theatrical incarnation - I'm looking directly at Fox in particular.

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 07-24-2013 02:56 AM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: David Zylstra
"Dolby Atmos Connect" is a loop where the devices daisy chain together with the first and last in the loop connecting back to the processor - very similar to (or the same as) BLU Link.
I've seen that in the specs. It is supposed to be an Ethernet based protocol, but it's currently only used to connect DAC3201 units for additional analog channel breakouts.

But this same system could probably be used to directly hook-up active speaker equipment that supports this protocol. The question is whether or not active systems will work in such a setting.

Regarding the front channels: If a cinema goes the length and installs all supported five of them, then there is no reason why the same or an even better experience can be achieved than with five channel magnetic tracks and/or SDDS.

The Atmos sound format itself doesn't contain discrete channels, the sound mixer puts the sound where it's supposed to originate and the system calculates the best possible mapping for that sound for the installed sound system.

Existing mixes can be easily mapped onto something like "virtual channels", that mimic the old channel mapping. Or, somebody could even go the length of remastering the whole soundtrack into a native Atmos mix, but that would be very expensive and might be frowned upon by purists [Wink] .

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 07-24-2013 07:06 AM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm a fan of active speaker systems myself - but in these quantities, I don't see a real benefit. You only need one wire pair per speaker with passive speakers. With a bus system, this would have to be a proprietary system, feeding signal and power supply to these speakers. The built in amplifiers would add weight, which is especially problematic for the ceiling speakers weight budget. Plus, reliability/replacement effort for these locations plays against it. 4ch amps in a rack is the better choice I guess. With some many systems, failure rates naturally have to go up, and proprietary systems will result in sourcing problems in the future.

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Jentsch
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: New Berlin, WI, USA
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 07-24-2013 12:11 PM      Profile for Scott Jentsch   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Jentsch   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Frank Angel
So theoretically, the system tries to replicate sound element placement in the SAME place no matter what the theatre size or how many speaker/channels are installed. If less speakers than are necessary to get exact localization to where the mixer wanted the sound to originate from, then it only gets as close as the installed system will allow, but not necessarily a cigar. Which is fine, and certainly better than speaker/channels dedicated to very limited and specific points with a sound needing (expected) to come out of THAT speaker at THAT location, which we have had so far up until Atmos. Thing is, this leaves an awful lot of leeway to the exhibitor...a pretty dangerous thing, IMHO. It lets them get away with putting in the LEAST amount of speakers with the assumption that Atmos will do the best to compute hot to place the sound where it is supposed to be, regardless of the actual limitations of the speakers vs the room size (and the exhibitor's "thriftiness").
I would think that a multi-channel microphone or some sort of device would be in order that would detect the accuracy of an Atmos installation. Perhaps a half-dome shaped object with a bunch of directional mics sticking out of it, Hellraiser-style, and a test track is played. The theater would be judged/ranked on how accurate the placement of sound to what is expected by the analysis software.

quote: Frank Angel
...in an era where the big, "X" large screens are all the marketing rage, I would think emphasizing good sound localization across a 60 foot screen would be a main component of any premium system.
This is a good point. It would be nice to see directional dialog used again, and being able to support historical titles with directional dialog would be quite nice for those venues that show them.

Maybe Dolby should sponsor a "Legends of Movie Sound" roadshow that would be a series of movies with great sound mixes that would play in their Atmos-equipped theaters around the country/world. That would help with awareness and give the theaters a chance to show off their investments.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 07-24-2013 03:32 PM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Scott Jentsch
This is a good point. It would be nice to see directional dialog used again, and being able to support historical titles with directional dialog would be quite nice for those venues that show them.

Maybe Dolby should sponsor a "Legends of Movie Sound" roadshow that would be a series of movies with great sound mixes that would play in their Atmos-equipped theaters around the country/world. That would help with awareness and give the theaters a chance to show off their investments.

unfortunately it sounds like the planned 70mm shot 'Ivanhoe' ain't happening - [Frown] - a great 'historical' that would looked great and perfect opportunity to bring back five front channel sound ... oh well [sigh]

I actually asked AMC via their facebook page if they could bring back 'Brave' to the Tysons' Atmos screen (since it didn't play in the DC area as such), they liked the idea and said they'd inquire with Disney and the higher ups at AMC to see if they could, but, alas, no dice.

Cinemark so far is the only chain that seems to like to book 'classic' films on Thursdays - if they had more Atmos systems on their ETX screens they could easily replay some of those missed Atmos titles.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Jentsch
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: New Berlin, WI, USA
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 07-26-2013 12:25 PM      Profile for Scott Jentsch   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Jentsch   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Atmos showtimes are getting more prevalent; 39 theaters are showing The Wolverine in 2D/3D:

http://www.bigscreen.com/advsearch/atmos.php

I decided it was about time that we indicate Atmos in the "digital sound" column of the showtimes, so now we do.

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 07-26-2013 06:53 PM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I finally heard the new Atmos sound system today with Wolverine, sad to say, this system has no chance at ever being a success or relevant in the current marketplace. The marketing is just not there for it.

 |  IP: Logged

Sam King
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 120
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Oct 2006


 - posted 07-26-2013 07:03 PM      Profile for Sam King   Email Sam King   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What types of licensing fees or annual percentage does Dolby impose to theatre operators with ATMOS?

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 07-27-2013 02:41 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There are zero annual fees on Atmos for the theatre. They own the equipment/system. It is just like when people bought Dolby Digital...once you have it, you own it.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 07-27-2013 04:13 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Scott you missed the Look theater in Dallas, running it on 2 Atmos screens.

 |  IP: Logged

Lyle Romer
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1400
From: Davie, FL, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 07-27-2013 08:35 PM      Profile for Lyle Romer   Email Lyle Romer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Scott,

AMC Downtown Disney 24 and Aventura 24 are playing The Wolverine in Atmos/ETX.

I'm pretty sure there are around 200 North America Atmos installations so I would think the number of Atmos presentations of The Wolverine would be pretty close to that.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Jentsch
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: New Berlin, WI, USA
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 07-29-2013 11:39 AM      Profile for Scott Jentsch   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Jentsch   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks for the heads-up about the LOOK Cinemas, Brad. I've contacted CinemaSource to get the Atmos and other indicators (Evolution, Look & Dine, etc.) added. It looks like the info is available, so it's just a matter of getting it sent through to us.

The AMC's are a different issue, Lyle. I looked on their web pages, and they say nothing about Atmos. Even though Dolby lists those two theaters on their site as having Atmos installations, the theaters apparently don't want anyone to know about it. They have Atmos listed in the right-hand column of amenities, but the shows aren't marked. Given that, I don't hold out too much hope for getting those indications from them.

As far as the number of installations go, I don't think it's up to 200 in the U.S. and Canada. My count the other day from Dolby's map showed about 80 theaters in the U.S., so even accounting for multiple Atmos installations in each theater and adding in the ones that are in Canada, we'd probably still come up a little short.

That said, I'm certain that a fair number of Atmos showtimes are not reflected in our listings. I would love to have all of that detail for every theater, and we pursue instances like the LOOK Cinemas example that Brad brought up, but we're really at the mercy of the theaters being willing to provide that information in the first place.

Which brings the conversation back to the fact that the entities involved really need to do more to publicize and promote Atmos for it to become more widespread.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 07-29-2013 01:41 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't understand why a movie theater that spent the money to install Atmos would not bother to advertise it much better or at least let customers know specifically which theater is equipped for it and if the current movie playing has an Atmos track.

I can think of a number of reasons why a theater wouldn't put forth the effort to advertise Atmos correctly. None of the reasons are good.

Maybe it takes them too much time/effort to figure out which specific movie and which specific theater has Atmos. Maybe they don't have staff who understands how to get that information properly updated on a theater web site or newspaper ad. If so, that's shitty customer service.

Maybe they want customers to guess which theater has Atmos or merely assume all the theaters are equipped with it. The goal is just getting customers into their multiplex buying tickets and snacks from the food counter rather than drive to a competing theater. Once the cattle are in the gate it doesn't matter which number chute they choose. Why give them any reason to have a preference of one screen over the other? They're all just as good and it doesn't make any difference. Again. This would be shitty customer service.

I'm sure various theater executives might like to explain to me about the sales motivations behind withholding technical information from customers. And I understand that. But I'm looking at it entirely from the customer's point of view. The customer comes first, not the damned sales executive.

AMC needs to be forthcoming about that information regarding Atmos equipped screens and actual Atmos shows. This is pretty easy shit compared to the other far more anal retentive stuff movie theater chains obsess over, like how many medium sized drink cups the 8-plex in Hamilton, Ohio went through last Wednesday.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 38 pages: 1  2  3  ...  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  ...  36  37  38 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.