Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » The "What makes me go insane!" thread (Page 43)

 
This topic comprises 45 pages: 1  2  3  ...  40  41  42  43  44  45 
 
Author Topic: The "What makes me go insane!" thread
Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 02-19-2010 03:45 AM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
People who write "none the less." It's one fucking word. It's not that hard to do.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-24-2010 12:51 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Maybe I am watching too much TV. The new VW campaign -- hasn't the population as a whole become loud and crass as it is? Do we really need this car company trying to start a global fad of people punching each other in the arm everytime they see a VW with the inane, "Red one," "White one," "Green one?" And in the ad, these are not gentle love taps, these are serious punches. How about the one where the kid punches his grandpa in the nuts? How uplifting.

I bet some of ad agency is hoping this will catch on big time. Well, they must have their headquarters in Chicago or LA or somewhere, because if that starts happening here in New York, or even worse, Brooklyn, there are going to be lots of people with missing teeth and broken noses and cracked heads showing up in emergency rooms all over town.

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 02-24-2010 02:26 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
Punching someone when you see a VW Beetle has been around since at least the 1970s.

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Parfrey
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1049
From: Imbil Australia 26 deg 27' 42.66" S 152 deg 42' 23.40" E
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 02-24-2010 02:51 PM      Profile for Ian Parfrey   Email Ian Parfrey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ah yes, the dreaded "Punch Buggy".
Lilo and Stitch, we're looking at you!

Don't you just love commercialism?

What makes me insane are those web ads, and in particular that dopey looking frizzy-haired dork who's a fat lump of lard in one picture, and in the next he's buffed beyond belief, six pack and all- and complete with overly large head. Maybe a candidate for Photoshop disasters?

The other one is that awful Sony 4K video projector ad that vandalises the top of Boxoffice pages. It's interesting to note the girl's head is larger than the advertised product by a ratio of 4:1.

Pointless.

....and stupid.

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Weigel
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1062
From: Edmond, OK, USA
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 02-24-2010 04:16 PM      Profile for Jeremy Weigel   Email Jeremy Weigel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Chris Slycord
People who write "none the less." It's one fucking word. It's not that hard to do.
Actually it is three words, so either way is correct.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-28-2010 05:01 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
ABC's Nightline as well as 20/20 have been using this "dirty film" process to make video shots look like film -- dirty, scratched film. What the point of this is is beyond me. Do they think this adds credibility if what is obviously a video clip has the look of film? I guess filmphiles should be pleased, but come on, the amount of scratches and dirt (I am talking big chunks of hair and emulsion scratches) that is imposed on the video is something you would see in the worst girnd houses. What's the point. The other night they even applied the stupid effect to still photos. WTF? Why are people who work in and create video trying to make their stuff look like film? And dirty, scratchy film at that?

 |  IP: Logged

Hillary Charles
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 748
From: York, PA, USA
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 02-28-2010 06:34 AM      Profile for Hillary Charles   Email Hillary Charles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Rdgarding commercials, the new McDonald's commercial with that douchebag interrupting everyone with "Don't talk to me until I've had my coffee." He even interrupts the cheery McDonald's counter girl, and when she gets to finish her pitch, he is even MORE douchey with his "Talk to me." If I were her, I'd let that hot coffee to my talking for me, right in his face! [evil]

McDonald's comes off as okay, just that guy... [fu]

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-28-2010 10:24 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wow, he looks like a complete douche. Who has a haircut like that? I mean, besides that guy? No one! Even his boyfriend looks like a douche, but less so.

 |  IP: Logged

Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-28-2010 10:40 AM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Frank Angel
ABC's Nightline as well as 20/20 have been using this "dirty film" process to make video shots look like film -- dirty, scratched film
It shows up in documentaries with "re-enacted" footage, also. I remember SNL doing it over 20 years ago. It was kinda fun to watch the same scratch and piece of dirt loop through several times. People who do this in "news" are idiots.

A similar and equally awful, though long used, technique is adding gunfire and plane noises and whatever to SILENT newsreel footage. They'll run clips of WWI war footage and put in the sound effects. Same with WWII, but at least there was sound in WWII (the footage was still shot silent).

Personally, I find the footage more effective without the fake sound, but I guess the powers that be think it is not "real" without fake sound.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-28-2010 10:51 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Martin McCaffery
Same with WWII, but at least there was sound in WWII (the footage was still shot silent).
So are you saying they added the sound back then and that makes it OK? I doubt there were too many sound-recording cameras in the field in WW2. Am I wrong?

 |  IP: Logged

Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-28-2010 11:21 AM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Joe: No, I'm saying at least they can make the feeble excuse there was sound recording technology in WWII, so it would seem marginally plausible to someone who didn't think about it. It's still fake, all that battle stuff was shot silent.

Of course, most of the WWI newsreel footage, US variety, was staged. WWI was fought on Long Island!

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-28-2010 06:40 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I remember having a debate with my dad about the WW2 footage. I insisted that the sounds were edited in and he insisted that they were recorded live on scene and "that's how it really sounded". I won the argument and became the true head of the Redifer empire.

 |  IP: Logged

Galen Murphy-Fahlgren
Master Film Handler

Posts: 405
From: Canton, MI, USA
Registered: Oct 2007


 - posted 02-28-2010 07:18 PM      Profile for Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Email Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There is a whole emperor of your kind? And its leadership is decided by arguments about 70 year old news footage?

 |  IP: Logged

Cody Martin
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 214
From: Edinburgh, IN, USA
Registered: Jun 2004


 - posted 03-02-2010 08:55 PM      Profile for Cody Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Cody Martin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It really annoys me when people end an email with "Thanks," and then just put their full email signature under. I always wonder why they didn't just add their name right under thanks so it looks like someone spent the extra second truly finishing their correspondence.

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Jorgenson
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1002
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: Feb 2005


 - posted 03-02-2010 09:25 PM      Profile for Jeremy Jorgenson   Author's Homepage   Email Jeremy Jorgenson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Isn't that the whole point of an email signature though? I think it looks worse if it ends:

Thanks,

Jeremy

Jeremy Jorgenson

company info, phone # blah blah

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 45 pages: 1  2  3  ...  40  41  42  43  44  45 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.