Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Cyan Tracks (Page 29)

 
This topic comprises 42 pages: 1  2  3  ...  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  ...  40  41  42 
 
Author Topic: Cyan Tracks
Richard Fowler
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 03-28-2004 12:46 PM      Profile for Richard Fowler   Email Richard Fowler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Scope raised the bar which required Technicolor to improve their process...Kodak, Agfa to improve their film stock...introduction of stereo sound out of the experimental / event phase....new architectual designs...more visual dynamic composition and staging...all good in the long run. The last exciter lamps I had where sold on E-bay a couple of years ago [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-28-2004 01:26 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote"Exhibitors should not convert until they have to" that is not a good idea since there would have beena high probablity that you would not be able to get a unit or have it installed in time
Up here FOX didn't put a cent towards the scope conversion and I understood it only did in the theatres they controlled

The LED is far more stable and I get hardly any calls now due to an A chain that is out of whack do to a bad excitor lamp filament
I went through over a box of BXM's trying to find ones with straight filaments for an excitor lamp house

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 03-28-2004 03:23 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
reverse scan readers with a cyan light source
Cyan light source, eh? Hehehe...well, Hitch did say the silent film was the ultimate form of cinema.

 |  IP: Logged

Warren Smyth
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 158
From: Auckland ,New Zealand
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 03-28-2004 05:39 PM      Profile for Warren Smyth   Email Warren Smyth   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
there would have been a high probability that you would not be able to get a unit or have it installed in time
Well I thought someone might say that which is why I included the qualification that one should not wait until the last week. Naturally a reasonable degree of project management is required taking into account service availability. When you look however, at the co-ordination required when commercial buildings are built with hundreds of contractors dovetailing to a common purpose over a short period, a led conversion pales into insignificance. When you can fly parts around the world in a few hours, a half day installation shouldn't require four years to accomplish safely. If that is the case, then it is a pretty poor reflection on the local service industry.

quote:
Up here Fox didn't put a cent towards a scope conversion and I understand they only did it in theatres they controlled
To be fair Gordon, Fox did have some shareholding in the company here but certainly didn't control it. Regulations on foreign ownership would not have allowed it. I don't want to make an issue of it, as it was just a passing comment prompted by your analogy, but the conversion did represent a substantial subsidy to the local owners at the time.

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 03-28-2004 07:20 PM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Responding to Steve K,

Sorry about the cyan light source reference, but I trust you knew my intention.

Hitch was right of course.

The recent United Airline commercial with a guy flying to an interview is brilliant, entirely without dialogue and tells a complete story in 30 seconds. There is of course the Gershwin, but that is only to add depth of emotion to the scene.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-28-2004 07:42 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Warren,

There is no way the service industry could on a mere couple of weeks notice make such a massive conversion. Depending on the territory, a technician may be responsible for up to 200-screens. If you take into account the travel time and that not all conversions are easy (how many have found the odd bearing spacer nearly fused to the sound drum shaft) and that perhaps some may wish to go with digital basement readers.

Lets say the average time spent converting the system over is 2-Hours including retuning....we have 800-man hours there for one tech. At 8-hours a day you have 100-business days (assuming that you can divide by even days since not all 200 screens are under one roof). So you are up to at least 1/3 of a year. But wait...what happened to all the other service work the technician was supposed to be doing? Does everyone agree not to let anything else break or no new construction should happen during this high-priority time?

If others experience has been like mine...most of the "coversions" happened as new installations, upgrade to digital and a gradual change as each theatre owner deterimined it was time. I may be the odd one in that most of mine happened as mostly either the first two. I can't think of many analog only readers I have installed.

As odd as it may sound...we have always been ahead of the curve in red-readers...I would say we are 95% there if not more so.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 03-28-2004 08:09 PM      Profile for Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Author's Homepage   Email Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Do you actually think that the quality of reproduction will go up with cyan track over high-magenta?
I would only hope that a cyan only track would be better optimized for a red LED source, since it's the only source that the cyan track would be compatible with, than a high magenta track which is optimized for both red LED and IR illumination.

So yes, I would think that the quality of reproduction using a red LED and cyan track would be superior than that of a red LED and high magenta track, but still inferior to the quality of reproduction with a silver track optimized for IR illumination using an IR source.

As to conversions, the few I've done have been to replace exciter lamp systems when the solar cell has started to die and the owner thought that he'd make the change, getting to deduct the cost of a solar cell from the coversion cost.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-28-2004 09:16 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As Daryl notes, the cyan dye tracks will be optimized for minimum cross-modulation distortion on red LED readers.

Traditional cyan+magenta+silver tracks and B&W silver tracks did not have the same cross-modulation optimization density for red LED and white light readers, so the "high magenta" (magenta+silver) track was developed as a temporary compromise for the current mix of readers.

Once there is only type of reader in use, both color prints (cyan dye) and B&W prints (silver only) can be optimized for minimum cross-modulation distortion on red LED readers.

Old prints that were optimized for white light readers will have a few percent cross-modulation distortion on a red LED reader, but will certainly still be playable, as most theatres have already found.

Errors in applying the viscous soundtrack developer for dye+silver tracks sometimes caused audible sound defects such as thumping (variations in density or width of the silver area) or pops (bubbles or skips in the developed area). Rarely, a few reels might even accidently go out without silver application. Any soundtrack developer that got onto the picture area left behind visible silver spots, stains, or "bleeding".

This was all discussed in the Paul Goldberg paper:

Paul Goldberg SMPTE Paper

Here is the Disney announcement:

Disney Switches to Cyan Dye Tracks in Fall 2004

quote:

Disney Announces Switch to Environmentally Friendly Pure-Dye Cyan Soundtracks on Worldwide Film Release Prints Starting This Fall

BURBANK, Calif., March 22 /PRNewswire/ -- Starting this fall, Buena Vista Pictures Distribution will begin issuing 35mm prints of Walt Disney Pictures and Touchstone Pictures releases with environmentally friendly pure-dye cyan soundtracks, it was announced today (3/22/04) by Chuck Viane, president of Buena Vista Pictures Distribution, and Jeff Miller, executive vice president, Worldwide Post Production and Operations for The Walt Disney Studios. This new soundtrack technology represents a significant environmental advance for the motion pictures industry, and eliminates the use of traditional silver- applicated tracks and the caustic chemicals involved in that process. Buena Vista plans to switch entirely to cyan soundtracks on all of its worldwide release prints by January, 2005. To accomplish this goal, the Disney distribution arm is working closely with Dolby, Kodak, Technicolor and NATO to perfect the technology and encourage theater owners to install RED LED soundtrack readers on their projectors. RED LED readers, which are now standard in all US manufactured projectors, are currently installed in the vast majority of projectors in use in this country. MGM has also announced that they will be issuing pure-dye cyan soundtracks on all release prints beginning this May.



 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 03-29-2004 12:07 AM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
The recent United Airline commercial with a guy flying to an interview is brilliant, entirely without dialogue and tells a complete story in 30 seconds.

Agreed! Marvelous spot. Actually I must correct myself; Hitch said it was the purest form of cinema.

 |  IP: Logged

William Hooper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1879
From: Mobile, AL USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-29-2004 03:25 AM      Profile for William Hooper   Author's Homepage   Email William Hooper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Old prints that were optimized for white light readers will have a few percent cross-modulation distortion on a red LED reader, but will certainly still be playable, as most theatres have already found.

This is an example of evasion of technical issues in an uncomfortable area. Suddenly the discussion switches from performance measurement to a print merely being 'playable'. A print with a green scratch all the way through it is 'playable'. A 'few percent' is all of the picture that is affected.

quote:
Sensitivity to a few percent cross-modulation distortion varies with the individual and the program material. Dialog with lots of "spitty" S sounds tends to emphasize the sibilant distortion.
This will be an utter delight & program-killer in venues like historic theaters that are often bangy & otherwise tricky to EQ. Once again, it's just the offhand dismissal of a segment deemed unimportant or, wilfully or via a need for psychological evasion, not considered at all.

quote:
Once there is only type of reader in use, both color prints (cyan dye) and B&W prints (silver only) can be optimized for minimum cross-modulation distortion on red LED readers.

Old prints that were optimized for white light readers will have a few percent cross-modulation distortion on a red LED reader, but will certainly still be playable, as most theatres have already found.

quote:
Pure silver should be fine IF the cross-modulation distortion was optimized for that reader. An old track optimized for a tungsten reader will have some sibilant distortion.
This is an example of impracticability of a method to maintain use of prints with previous technology. Now, when you get a new-looking print with a silver soundtrack, what will be the method to discern if it was optimized for a tungsten or cyan reader?

---

The adoption of Cinemascope is an example of how the ability to run previous formats was MAINTAINED with the addition of a new system. Addition of Cinemascope did NOT affect running non-anamorphic titles at all. This is where SMPTE is truly getting a black mark for running counter to its previous role in maintaining standards. SMPTE previously ensured compatibility & the use of previous inventory by safeguarding important technical points as placement & specs of soundtrack, picture area, etc. New ideas had to be compatible. Adddition of SRD, DTS, & SDDS had to be compatible with existing sound formats.

As I've mentioned before, Steve Guttag & I disagree profoundly on ecology issues, but I'll agree that using them in ANY way to support this change is duplicitous. In other industries which affect the environment, the resposnibility for maintaining an environmentally sound operation falls with the industry. The industry here is the labs. As an example, in the polluting coal-fired electrical plant industry, it's the PLANTS which must install scrubbers & otherwise invest in systems to maintain their services, they pass their costs on as the cost of the service. Imagine switching to something which would require all consumers to change their outlets, & offering adapters for older appliances which would make them run, but only poorly. But what a boon to the appliance & outlet manufacturers! In this case, though, the beneficiaries are Dolby & the labs, happily passing the costs & deficiencis all to the end user, enabled only by pushing it through via SMPTE.

It's interesting that the directed "smooth rollout" of cyan precluded the gradual introduction of cyan trailers, & just went straight to the point of switching over. This in turn eliminated the possibility of any disagreement & discussion of the system as the tracks appeared, & enabled the unneccessary-to-discuss-the-technical-issues, "Ha, ha, ha, it's too late now, you're screwed, give it up because you can't do anything about it" response from Dolby.

This ingenuous, 'but we told everybody so nobody should argue' stand is dishonest in many ways. Bzzt & smoke go programs, venues, systems of running prints existing to be run pre-cyan. There was in the Moving Image Archivists discussion of the staid platters-vs.-changeover issue related to owners of archive & specialty prints, but there has NEVER been brought to the attention of the archive folks who send their prints out to some theaters that run platters, some changeover, that with the red readers that were mandated for cyan tracks that their prints will now sound distorted, sibilant, & 'spitty'. They're not just archives, but companies like Kino which have as a business maintaining a library of specialty titles for rental. For a huge burst of excitement, it would be nice to see a plain, technical, operationally-inclusive & performance-oriented statement such as the above broadcast to them. It would be honest, at least, & the resulting entertainment would be the deserved reward for that honesty.

--
As a fun trivia tidbit, there was a theater dating from the silent days on Canal Street in New Orleans, narrow building, about a 20 foot wide screen, which NEVER ran a scope film. That would have resultied in a screen only about 8 feet high! It would have been stupid esthetically & thus in any business sense to put such a picture up. So they never added scope, just ran non-anamorphich titles & did pretty well up through the early 1970's, when the theater was sold to create a parcel to accommodate a new larger building. Cinemascope was an ADDITION, an option, not a replacement, & non-destructive; completely the reverse of the cyan soundtrack & red reader mandate.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 03-29-2004 03:35 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Addition of Cinemascope did NOT affect running non-anamorphic titles at all.
Yes it did; and as you point out in relation to John's post about silver tracks and in your closing anecdote, the issue is one of relative performance rather than whether you can play them at all. Try showing an Academy ratio film in a '30s auditorium which was been rebuilt in the '50s for 'scope, and the picture will as likely as not be about the size of a postage stamp, with several square miles of black masking fabric all around it.

It's very rarely that you find a theatre which has the masking on all four sides needed to show 1-38 at its best (the place in Vancouver where the screenings at last year's AMIA conference took place was a lovely exception, with a big, tall screen which virtually filled your field of vision). Seems to me that the compatibility issue with 'legacy' tracks and red readers is a very similar one. You'll still be able to play them, but they won't sound as good.

Personally, rather than bring in cyan tracks, I'd have got rid of the analogue SVA track altogether and started issuing Super 35 release prints with two Dolby digital tracks, one between each set of perforations (one being a backup). That would solve the environmental problem (if there ever was one), give you a much bigger frame, and if theatres are going to be forced to install new equipment anyway, they might as well go digital at that point. After all, 99.9% of mainstream film releases now have digital sound anyway; and the small number of foreign titles which don't could continue to use a silver track. Given the number of release prints they account for, there can't be much of an environmental argument against that. Theatres which show archive and rep titles could then have kept their exciter bulbs and everyone would have been happy. Sure, theatres would need new lenses and plates (not to mention realigning their projectors to account for the change in optical centre of the frame), and such an idea would screw DTS (the timecode would have to go at the edge of the new frame and readers in the field modified accordingly). But given the huge increase in image quality, I'd say it would have been worth investigating.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-29-2004 07:13 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So Leo...now your idea is to have exhibitors that do not have digital sound be forced into purchasing one...and with a specific brand at that.

Why, for instance should a Drive-In be forced into a high-tech multi-channel sound system? Were are you going to put the subwoofer and keep it isolated from the other theatres [Wink] With just SVA, one can create a nifty system that can either use traditional poles or using two different frequencies create a front and rear sound field.

CDS tried to do the eliminate the soundtrack idea...it didn't fly too well. Sony was also thinking along the same lines with SDDS. Analog sound will always have a robustness that digital will not have. Sure, the sound may get more degraded with time, if not properly cared for but generally it work and it can be kept working. Digital either works or it doesn't.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 03-29-2004 08:31 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There'd be nothing new about forcing exhibitors into buying or leasing specific, patented technologies - this has been going on throughout the history of the industry. For example, if you want to show a certain feature you have to pay for the print stock and the services of the specific lab which made the print (albeit indirectly) - you don't get any choice in the matter. If you think Kodak prints look better than Fuji but all the prints for a given title were made on Fuji, there's nothing you can do to change that.

And a drive-in wouldn't need to install a 5.1 sound system - it could mix all the channels into a single one for playback/transmission, just as there are still some theatres that play SVA tracks in mono. And in any case, when the relevant patents run out, I'm sure we'll be seeing DD processors produced by other manufacturers; just as there are non-Dolby processors available now which can play SVA tracks.

Granted, the reliability of digital optical tracks - and specifically the risk of total failure - is a tougher nut to crack.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-29-2004 07:02 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Not so fast on other brands of DD processors...While in the consumer market they like to license...in the professional market, they have always kept it all to themselves. Did they ever license either Dolby-A or Dolby-SR to any other manufacturers? I don't know of anyone they have licensed their professional digital encode/decode to either.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 03-30-2004 12:31 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Did they ever license either Dolby-A or Dolby-SR to any other manufacturers?
No, but that hasn't stopped other manufacturers producing hardware which will play back Dolby SVA tracks (e.g. 'CopyCat' CP cards for A-type and SR); though Dolby will of course claim that the reproduction is inferior. I'd be astonished if, sooner or later, someone will find a way of producing a 'generic' SR-D processor using software that doesn't infringe on Dolby's patents. And eventually, the patents themselves will expire.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 42 pages: 1  2  3  ...  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  ...  40  41  42 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.