Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » Dolby's new sound system (Page 18)

 
This topic comprises 38 pages: 1  2  3  ...  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  ...  36  37  38 
 
Author Topic: Dolby's new sound system
Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-23-2013 11:23 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I wonder how many ATMOS installations have gone to the trouble of adding two more speakers behind the screen. Most seem to concentrate on the ceiling channels, the ones people can see.

 |  IP: Logged

Jarod Reddig
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 513
From: Hays, Ks
Registered: Jun 2011


 - posted 05-24-2013 01:18 AM      Profile for Jarod Reddig   Email Jarod Reddig   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Pertaining to what Bobby said about not seeing Dolby Atmost on any movie poster. I have a Brave movie poster that says "Persented in Dolby Atmos" at the bottom of it.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-24-2013 05:27 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As to LC/RC...I think more than you would suspect. In the big cost of things...those two are not that expensive as compared to the whole rigging and wiring of the ceiling surrounds. Note too, the additional side surrounds towards the front of the theatre (typically 2-3 speakers per side) have nearly identical performance requirements as stage channels (40Hz - 16KHz and able to hit 105dBc in the critical listening area).

Whereas LC/RC are "recommended" for large theatres (40' screens and greater)...the types of auditoriums that are likely to get Atmos, most will fall into that category.

There are also many SDDS-8 theatres out there still and they would likely be candidates for Atmos since they were the larger theatres of the SDDS days.

 |  IP: Logged

Sean Goodrich
Film Handler

Posts: 22
From: Dallas, TX, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 05-24-2013 11:47 AM      Profile for Sean Goodrich   Email Sean Goodrich   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It's a shame that SDDS-8 didn't take off. Imagine if 5 screen channels were more common when the digital revolution happened, then we'd see DCPs of 70mm movies with their original soundtrack, instead of remixing for 5.1.
Even if it's a hit, I doubt we'll see Sound of Music in Dolby Atmos just for the two extra screen channels, and mono surround.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-24-2013 09:23 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
5 screen channels was always in the DCI description.

 |  IP: Logged

Peter Angelo Bua-ay
Film Handler

Posts: 8
From: Quezon city , Philippines
Registered: Mar 2013


 - posted 05-31-2013 10:38 PM      Profile for Peter Angelo Bua-ay   Email Peter Angelo Bua-ay   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We've just finished installing/set up a dolby atmos sound cinema. We don't have yet the processor since as per dolby, they will be the one to install and align since we're not certified yet. I'm looking it to be one of the best sound system that we set up. For this new set up of sound, the only hard thing is the ceiling speakers installation

 |  IP: Logged

Jarod Reddig
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 513
From: Hays, Ks
Registered: Jun 2011


 - posted 06-01-2013 01:08 AM      Profile for Jarod Reddig   Email Jarod Reddig   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Peter is it a 5 speaker stage setup or 3?

 |  IP: Logged

Peter Angelo Bua-ay
Film Handler

Posts: 8
From: Quezon city , Philippines
Registered: Mar 2013


 - posted 06-01-2013 02:32 AM      Profile for Peter Angelo Bua-ay   Email Peter Angelo Bua-ay   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jarod,

5 screen channels/stage speakers.

 |  IP: Logged

Jarod Reddig
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 513
From: Hays, Ks
Registered: Jun 2011


 - posted 06-03-2013 12:43 AM      Profile for Jarod Reddig   Email Jarod Reddig   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Excellent thanks.

 |  IP: Logged

Gavin Lewarne
Master Film Handler

Posts: 278
From: Plymouth, UK
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 06-03-2013 02:01 PM      Profile for Gavin Lewarne   Email Gavin Lewarne   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
is there a minimum auditorium size for Atmos to function effectively ? im wondering about possibly speccing it for our potential new build - a 2 screener with approx. 200 / 250 seats per screen

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-03-2013 02:50 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think it should function fine in auditoriums of that size.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-03-2013 04:04 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Considering the high price for Atmos that money would go a lot farther in significantly bigger auditoriums. I have doubts a minimal configuration would be worth all the extra expense of installing a CP850 along with whatever else was added or replaced in the sound system just to get "Atmos" listed on the marquee.

I saw an article from the L.A. Times about Atmos, stating the Dolby CP850 Atmos processor has a list price of over $33,000. They clarify in parenthesis no one actually pays that full amount, but I'd still like to know how much of a discount is typically applied for commercial theater customers. If the CP850 is still costing north of $20,000 after discounts it still makes Dolby Atmos a very expensive sound system upgrade. The theater still has to budget in all the extra amplifiers, new speakers, installation costs, etc. And then there's the added maintenance costs that will be needed to keep an Atmos system working and sounding properly.

Back in the 1990s, when surround sound was actually still a marketable attraction (before stadium seating, digital projection, 3D and fake giant format experiences stole the limelight) movie theaters weren't paying nearly as much to install 5.1 digital surround sound.

The first Cinema Digital Sound and Dolby Digital processors carried $20,000 price tags. DTS shook that up with the $2,500 and $3,500 introductory prices for the DTS-S and DTS-6 players. Dolby ran pricing specials on the DA-20 system, getting it well below the $10,000 level. Cinema processors that integrated Dolby Digital (CP-500, CP-650) made the cost even more reasonable to install 5.1 surround.

Atmos is taking cost requirements in the opposite direction and possibly doing so at an extreme. Worse, this is happening when it seems like very few people (including many movie theater tech geeks) give a tinker's damn about good quality sound.

If it has to cost north of $50K-$60K to install Dolby Atmos in a single theater auditorium, in an effective configuration, I'm not optimistic the sound format is ever going to catch on with theater operators or even the general public if the marketing continues to be extremely weak. A theater operator looking to spend that kind of money might prefer to put it toward IMAX instead even if IMAX digital would cost more money than Atmos.

There's a decent number of movies coming out this summer with mixes in Dolby Atmos. Too bad the nearest Atmos equipped theater is more than 200 miles away, and probably will stay that way. Warren Theaters are big on everything Dolby, but have passed on Atmos to this point.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-03-2013 05:28 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
He didn't ask if it would be practical. He asked if it would work.

We only have 194 seats here and I'd still install Atmos if there was a way to do it for, say, 10 to 15 grand. Of course I'm a gadget freak so I immediately fell for it when I heard it. But there are other things on my wish list ahead of it. (Stage curtain, for example.)

 |  IP: Logged

Gavin Lewarne
Master Film Handler

Posts: 278
From: Plymouth, UK
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 06-03-2013 06:40 PM      Profile for Gavin Lewarne   Email Gavin Lewarne   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Given the new build won't be hapenning until 2016 I was merely looking into its viability for our needs. Regardless of what will eventually be installed I have to start thinking of cost options and designs now as the financing stage takes a long time. Giving multiple options is a requirement .

I'd imagine it will be standard 7.1 but it doea not hurt to ask, and we never know we might get a yes

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Jentsch
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: New Berlin, WI, USA
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 06-04-2013 10:29 AM      Profile for Scott Jentsch   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Jentsch   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think you're looking at it from the right perspective. You shouldn't start saying "no" to things when you're still in the ideas stage.

Better to keep yourself open than to assume that something isn't doable when it is, or will be.

If I were a financial backer of a proposed project, I would consider it to be irresponsible for the person doing the planning not to consider all options, especially if they deliver the best results. You can always say no if conditions warrant, but you can't say yes to a question that was never asked.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 38 pages: 1  2  3  ...  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  ...  36  37  38 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.