|
|
|
|
Author
|
Topic: The "What makes me go insane!" thread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 08-28-2009 09:21 PM
I saw 2001 many times, ran it many times as well and I NEVER read the book and I probably never will. I never thought it SHOULD be explained beyond the language of the film. Whatever you make of it should come ONLY from the film. A novel and a movie are two very different art forms. And why CAN'T some of the film remain ambiguous rather than literal? That aspect never bothered me. As for shortening it, if anything needed to be shortened, it MIGHT have been the space walk to repair the module. But there is so much that’s right….I would even say that's brilliant about this film that who am I to tell the director, hey, you should shorten this scene 'cause I would like it better. Maybe he WANTS to make me feel the ponderous boredom of life in space. Oh, and to keep this On Thread.... I HATE when people say about any movie, “oh, I read the book and the movie isn't as good." (which I know you did not say, Joe).
quote: Joe Redifer The whole ending sequence pissed me off. He turns into a giant baby and floats to Earth. WTF? People will say that's beyond brilliance because it is so artsy-fartsy.
Actually that ending just comes full circle -- the monolith -- what ever you personally come to think it means, is there at the first evolution of the species from ape to man and there it is there again at the end, presumably when man is evolving into the next, more advanced species.
I only saw it stoned once – my one Cinerama time and I am quite sure that being stoned made it the LEAST satisfying of all.
But this is off topic soooo.....I HATE sentences like this: quote: used after an indefinite singular antecedent in place of the definite masculine form his or the definite feminine form her
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 45 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 43 44 45
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|