Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » The "What makes me go insane!" thread (Page 34)

 
This topic comprises 45 pages: 1  2  3  ...  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  ...  43  44  45 
 
Author Topic: The "What makes me go insane!" thread
Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-16-2009 08:29 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree. Cinematographers who can only "follow trends" aren't exactly very creative.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 12-16-2009 11:40 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Again, I repeat, this isn't the fault of the cinematographers. It's the asshole directors who are behind this nonsense.

Nearly every Michael Bay movie has one of those silly circle pan shots. That's Bay calling it, not the DP of the month. Tony Scott had a circle pan of the top of a building shot from a helicopter in Spy Game. He had the aerial circle pan intercut with closeups of Brad Pitt and Robert Redford arguing. He probably had big sketchpad story boards with a shit load of swoosh marks all over the stick figures. CIRCLE PAN THIS PART, BITCH! Do it from the SKY!!! Aaarrggh!

While we're at it, "shaky cam" in the Bourne movies? I think that's more on the director, Paul Greengrass rather than whatever DP was hired for the shoot.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 12-17-2009 08:47 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Another thing that makes me go insane: when people confuse "dolly" with "pan". I really should have said circle-dolly rather than circle-pan. I'm such an asshole.
[Razz]

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-17-2009 09:48 AM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Don't they also call it a "Carousel Shot?"

Yeah, it's way overused! (Whatever it's called.)
It's like what happens when somebody is just learning how to edit video with "Movie Maker" or "iMovie." You'll see them use every transition in the book when they aren't necessary.

You try to tell them to either use a simple cross dissolve or even just cut to the next shot but they insist on putting in every "ripple," "slide," "cube spin" and "page peel" effect they can get their hands on until the video looks like a damn circus!

The same thing happens when you are trying to teach people to shoot video and they keep zooming in and out all the time. You have to, pretty much, slap them upside the head and yell at them to keep their damn fingers off the zoom button!

I have a rule when I teach kids to make videos. They are only allowed to use an effect ONE TIME. If they want a zoom shot, they are allowed to zoom in or zoom out and that's it. If they want a ripple transition at the beginning or end of a scene, they are allowed to do it once and that's it.

I think there should be the same rule for the circle shot. (or carousel shot or whatever it's really called.) If he wants to use it, he's allowed to do it ONCE. If he wants to use it a second time in the same movie, he las to let some big, badass stagehand kick him in the nuts first! [evil]

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 12-17-2009 12:20 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No, it should not be used in ANY movie, not even once. But whoever is responsible should definitely be kicked in the nuts just for considering it.

I think the concept behind it is that it shows a 360 view. You don't see the director, crew and equipment anywhere, therefore completely immersing you into the film's "world". Please... [Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 12-17-2009 12:55 PM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
and people who confuse "pan" with "tilt"

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 12-17-2009 03:05 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Joe Redifer
I think the concept behind it is that it shows a 360 view. You don't see the director, crew and equipment anywhere, therefore completely immersing you into the film's "world". Please...
Yeah, "immersed" is a pretty ridiculous claim for that kind of shot. I have the opposite reaction when I see the circle-dolly carousel thing. It makes me think about what kind of Technocrane might have been rented or what kind of custom set may have been built all just to get the circular dollying shot.

Normally, you think of a camera angle as a sort of natural point of view into the story (character's POV, third person POV) or conventional establishing/covering shots that don't draw attention to themselves. The carousel shot doesn't fit that at all. If it was a character's POV it would be that of a spastic idiot roller skating circles around the other guys in the scene. And then we hope of the other characters finally loses it and beats the skater half to death!

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-17-2009 03:35 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hearing the top ten Christmas "carols" on the radio 3,874 times each before Dec. 25th, making me wish that Nat King Cole's own nuts were roasting on an open fire....in one of the lower rings in hell.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-17-2009 06:11 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Even though I enjoy the Christmas music, that post made me crack up.

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-17-2009 06:31 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There are two Christmas carols.

  1. "Adeste Fidelis"
    Sung in Latin by a huge choir.
    Accompanied by a monstrous pipe organ that plays so loud it makes you pee your pants when you hear it.
    And, of course, it would be impossible to faithfully record. You would have to attend a live performance.
    .
  2. "Linus and Lucy"
    Played by the Vince Guaraldi Trio.
    But, since Vince Guaraldi is dead, you would have to listen to this on recording.
Other than that, all songs are crap, not Christmas.

Okay, Maybe I'd give in to "Veni, veni, Emmanuel" but only if sung by choir, unaccompanied, in Latin and arranged in its original antiphonal harmony. Again, a true rendition of this would be unrecordable.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-17-2009 11:05 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'll give you that, Randy, but even the best of the best would drive you insane if you have to hear them starting at Halloween....Hallow EFFIN WEEN!.

Even I can't stand "The First Noel," more than a few times, and that is a song which my Mom said they sang especially for me on my birthday, given that I was born on the 25th of December and gave me the middle name of Noel (and yes, it's pronounced "noel" not "knoll"). I believed they did all those decorations for me too until I was about 6 yro. [thumbsup] Then they broke it to me. [thumbsdown]

 |  IP: Logged

James Westbrook
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1133
From: Lubbock, Texas, Usa
Registered: Mar 2006


 - posted 12-17-2009 11:56 PM      Profile for James Westbrook   Email James Westbrook   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Worst Christmas novelty song: Grandma Got Run Over By a Reindeer. I don't know or care who originally performed it.
Best Christmas novelty song: Christmas at Ground Zero by "Weird Al" Yankovich. (I think I spelled his name right...)

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Hill
I love my cootie bug

Posts: 7595
From: Hollywood, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 12-18-2009 12:19 AM      Profile for Phil Hill   Email Phil Hill       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: James Westbrook
Worst Christmas novelty song: Grandma Got Run Over By a Reindeer.
Oh come on, James! Where's your sense of humor? Don't be a Grinch! [Razz]

It's been a traditional xmas tune for umteen years. I personally would NOT think of celebrating Christmas without it!

Grandma Got Run Over by a Reindeer

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 12-18-2009 12:38 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I prefer Grandma's Frozen on the Porch Swing.

Also:
-Let's Put the Lights on the Trailer.
-Is That Rudolph's Nose or Daddy's?

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 12-18-2009 08:35 AM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I always liked "Jingle Bells" by the barking dogs. Ever since I was a kid.

Also, in my radio days, I used to like to play "Santa's Rap" (the bleeped version, of course) from Beat Street. One day, the GM heard me playing it and came into the control room after it was over. He said, "what in the hell was that," asked me to give it to him, and he threw it away! [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 45 pages: 1  2  3  ...  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  ...  43  44  45 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.