|
|
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Cyan Tracks
|
|
|
Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 03-15-2004 07:45 AM
Brad, no doubt the trailer idea is quite do-able, especially since they already do dual inventories of trailers for scope and flat versions. The only thing is, you wouldn't want to use trailer elements as a substitute for real test materials, given what we know of the quality control on most trailers. You sure couldn't use them as a reference level, given that trailers are recorded 6db hotter than they should be in the first place.
But certainly just for a cheap, down and dirty, "let's see how this red reader sounds with a cyan track" kind of thing, going to dye tracks on trailers before the cyan features begin rolling out in full force is the sane way to go -- something I would think the SMPTE subcommittee would strongly suggest to all parties involved. In fact,this would be way to gauge how many theatres still are not equipped with red readers. Just send out cyan track trailers exclusively, and then document how many theatres complain that they need silver track versions. That will be the best kind of survey (and a cheap one at that) as to what kind of trouble a distributor will get into (or not) if he goes with a cyan-only release.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 03-16-2004 10:55 AM
Ted Costas of Dolby mentioned that another feature or two using cyan dye analog tracks would be announced next week at ShoWest.
Steve: How is your SMPTE technical paper coming? Is your amplitude performance, cross-modulation performance, or noise performance data any different than that presented in fellow "cyan clown" ( ) Paul Goldberg's paper published for peer review in the May 1998 SMPTE Journal?:
http://www.dyetracks.org/ci.os.0012.reddye.html
Coming to a different conclusion is valid, and well within the scope of rational engineering discussion. But good engineering judgement looks at ALL the factors (including the quality lost due to application problems, and missed opportunities for general improvement), not just one or two that you pick and choose.
quote: Submitting a Paper for Publication in the SMPTE Journal
Papers from all areas of motion imaging technology are welcome for submission in the Journal. After submission, all papers are reviewed by the Board of Editors. Submitted papers should be sent to SMPTE, at smpte@smpte.org.
The SMPTE Board of Editors will help you in your choice of words, choosing more professional terms than "clowns", "bull shit", "bozos", "stupid", "cow farts", "envirowackos", etc., that betray your personal bias.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|