Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » The Afterlife   » Anyone consuming HD or Blu-ray? (Page 97)

 
This topic comprises 105 pages: 1  2  3  ...  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  ...  103  104  105 
 
Author Topic: Anyone consuming HD or Blu-ray?
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-02-2008 06:52 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bruce Hansen
This sounds like more marketing BS from Toshiba. The reason that HD-DVD failed was that Blu-Ray has almost TWICE the storage, and a much higher max data rate. So now Toshiba is going to use a DVD?
Toshiba probably sees Apple squeezing a 2 hour 720p movie into only 4GB of space and managing to get their balls licked and ass kissed by the computing technology press at the same time. Naturally, one could extrapolate that a 1080p movie at the same severe level of compression might be able to work in 8GB of space.

The trouble is Toshiba doesn't have Apple's ungodly level of brand worship to use in hiding the fact a pretty shitty product is being sold. People will buy shit from Apple and eat it like it's chocolate ice cream because it has a pretty Apple logo stamped on it (although it doesn't appear customers are downloading HD movies from iTunes like crazy). I don't think Toshiba will be extended the same advantage. The Toshiba brand doesn't have the same level of fashionable mystique. Maybe if Sarah Jessica Parker was pimping a Toshiba notebook in Sex in the City instead of a MacBook Pro it might help. Or not. I don't know. I just know this new HD on plain DVD thing is going to go nowhere.

quote: Joe Redifer
I just bought Rambo (4) because it is way better than movies like The Other Boleyn Girls, etc.
I'm thinking about picking up the first two Rambo movies in Blu-ray format. Sam's Club is selling them for $14.95 each. They have the 3 movie BD package for $36. But I thought Rambo III sucked. I may consider renting Rambo (4). There's a really gruesome screen shot in the review at Blu-ray.com.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Schindler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1039
From: Oak Park, IL, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 06-02-2008 07:37 PM      Profile for Mike Schindler   Email Mike Schindler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I read somewhere that Mike Nichols wanted to direct FIRST BLOOD with Dustin Hoffman as Rambo. That might've been a good movie.

EDIT: Okay, maybe not.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-02-2008 09:29 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
First Blood is my favorite. I agree that Rambo 3 is the low point, but since the box set was so cheap I decided "Hell, why not?" It's not a horrible movie, but definitely doesn't hold a candle to any of the others. Rambo 4 is a bit slow but still good and very brutal. It's not like Saw or those type of movies with its gore. Most of the gore happens very, very fast.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Schindler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1039
From: Oak Park, IL, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 06-02-2008 11:38 PM      Profile for Mike Schindler   Email Mike Schindler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Speaking of crappy movies, Sony has just announced their catalog titles for 8/12. They're releasing HALF PAST DEAD, MAXIMUM RISK, 7 SECONDS, and XXX: STATE OF THE UNION.

Call me crazy, but if it were up to me, I think I'd release stuff like DESPERADO and PUNCH-DRUNK LOVE before digging into the canon of direct-to-video Wesley Snipes movies.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-02-2008 11:59 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The only thing I really remember about Desparado is that it was SDDS only. Same with From Dusk Till Dawn I think. We rocked it ATRAC style and the audiences loved it so much that MiniDisc sales spiked just because customers wanted to experience the same type of compression on a consumer level.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-03-2008 01:03 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I watched Desperado in Dallas at the AMC Grand 24 when it was still a brand new theater. The show was playing in a smaller auditorium. The sound system was tuned well enough that the 360° clapping surround effect very early in the film moved around the auditorium very well. Not really all that great a movie though. I didn't bother buying the "Superbit" DVD version even though it had DTS on it.

I'm pretty sure From Dusk Til Dawn had both Dolby Digital and SDDS audio tracks. It was a Dimension title and in early 1996 they were doing most of their shows as SRD/SDDS prints.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 06-03-2008 08:32 AM      Profile for Bill Gabel   Email Bill Gabel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You should buy Patton. It looks and sounds Great for an older title making the transfer to HD. [thumbsup] [thumbsup]

And they carried over all the other feature material from the last special edition on SD.
The Dirty Harry collection also looks Great on Blu-ray too.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Jentsch
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: New Berlin, WI, USA
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 06-03-2008 11:05 AM      Profile for Scott Jentsch   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Jentsch   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wow, you guys read a lot more into that news report than I did!

Aside from demonstrating that they may not have a complete grasp on technical reality (e.g. using SACD as an example of "adding on" data to an existing format), it almost seems like they are taking a molehill and crafting a mountain from it.

What I've gathered from other news reports about the Toshiba development is that they are going to be using the Cell processor (remember they bought the Cell processor plant) to upconvert standard definition DVD's with better quality than what has been possible from other products so far.

The head of Toshiba has been quoted as saying that the technology they're developing will rival high definition images on HD DVD discs.
quote:
If you watch standard DVDs on our players, the images are of very high quality because they include an "upconverting" feature. And we're going to improve this even more, so that consumers won't be able to tell the difference from HD DVD images. The players would be much cheaper than Blu-ray players too. Next-generation DVD players are in a much weaker position than when standard DVD players were first introduced.
One of the criticisms that people have had of HD DVD and Blu-ray is that they couldn't tell the difference between them and standard definition DVD's. If Toshiba is successful in creating an even better upconverting player than the current crop of player, at a price level that is much lower than Blu-ray players, they have a potential market.

I don't think Toshiba's trying to create a new format, I don't think they're trying "add on" some new additional data to the DVD format, and I don't think that the results they will achieve will really be equivalent to high definition possible on Blu-ray.

I do think that it's possible that a high end processor can do some great things when it comes to upsampling/upconverting video. I also think that the Blu-ray format hasn't gained a true foothold in the market, and they are going to have to reduce their prices, increase their visibility, and get rid of the under-featured players that are currently on the market.

Just because there isn't another high definition video format to compete against, it doesn't mean that Blu-ray is going to succeed by default. That's a reality that Blu-ray hardware manufacturers don't appear to understand.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-03-2008 01:19 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One thing the manufacturers didn't understand was the possibility the format war could end at any time and they weren't prepared for it. They weren't set to scale up production for bigger volume orders and get newer models with better capability to the market faster and at lower prices. It's currently a slow time of year for video sales, but they have to be ready to deliver some good products and deals this fall.

quote: Scott Jentsch
The head of Toshiba has been quoted as saying that the technology they're developing will rival high definition images on HD DVD discs.
It's a quote that has drawn quite a bit of laughter. A 345,600 pixel image blown up 600% isn't going to be equal to an image with 2 megapixels of native image detail.

quote: Scott Jentsch
One of the criticisms that people have had of HD DVD and Blu-ray is that they couldn't tell the difference between them and standard definition DVD's.
That kind of claim has been repeated very often, but it's still very ridiculous.

The claim raises too many questions about viewing varibles. For starters, how good is the viewer's eye sight? What native resolution is the viewer's TV? 1080p? 720? Or perhaps a mere 480 X 852 "EDTV?" Lots of inexpensive EDTVs capable of receiving DTV signals display only 480 x 852 resolution, even if it is being fed a 1080p signal via HDMI from a Blu-ray player. What size of TV is being used? What's the viewing distance? Last, but not least, what specific Blu-ray movie is the viewer watching? Is the viewer watching a movie widely acclaimed for its image quality (such as Cars) or one that has been drubbed by critics for having a bad transfer (like Robocop or Training Day)?

The people saying Blu-ray doesn't look any different than DVD are conveniently leaving out all of that critical information.

quote: Scott Jentsch
If Toshiba is successful in creating an even better upconverting player than the current crop of player, at a price level that is much lower than Blu-ray players, they have a potential market.
There's two problems.

1. They have to get studio support for the format. Good luck on that, Toshiba.

2. They have to get retailers to carry the hardware. That may be an even longer shot.

High end electronics stores are already announcing plans to eliminate standard DVD players from their store shelves and replace them with Blu-ray players since those players can also play DVDs and unconvert them. They're doing that because there's actually a profit margin in Blu-ray hardware.

Cheap DVD players are unprofitable and present very little in the way of upsell opportunity for accessories and other gear. That's because everyone buying a DVD player these days is merely buying a replacement for one that stopped working.

After the heated HD-DVD versus Blu-ray battle, I'm certain movies studios are sick of format wars and not interested in entering another one which could threaten to confuse both Blu-ray and SD DVD markets.

Hollywood studios haven't forgot just how slow disc sales were for both HD-DVD and Blu-ray when the format war was raging. Now that studios have united behind Blu-ray, disc sales for the format are growing. Some deeper price discounts are now taking place.

I pulled up the website for Wal-Mart early this morning and was surprised to see them pricing the new Blu-ray of Cloverfield just under $20. They have the 5-disc edition of Bladerunner priced at only $15! There's several other WB titles priced at $15. Some titles, like those from Fox, are still high. But it looks like they're doing more to match the lower prices at Amazon.com.

Edited to correct a typo.

[ 06-04-2008, 12:42 AM: Message edited by: Bobby Henderson ]

 |  IP: Logged

Sam Graham
AKA: "The Evil Sam Graham". Wackiness ensues.

Posts: 1431
From: Waukee, IA
Registered: Dec 2004


 - posted 06-03-2008 09:03 PM      Profile for Sam Graham   Author's Homepage   Email Sam Graham   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
I pulled up the website for Wal-Mart early this morning and was surprised to see them pricing the new Blu-ray of Cloverfield just under $20. They have the 5-disc edition of Bladerunner priced at only $15! There's several other WB titles priced at $15. Some titles, like those from Fox, are still high. But it looks like they're doing more to match the lower prices at Amazon.com.
They're doing this in the stores too. I bought the "Close Encounters" BD for three bucks cheaper than Amazon's price last week.

Wal-Mart's aforementioned expansion of players is a full-blown Blu-ray showcase. Each store is devoting an aisle of their Electronics department to Blu-ray (some are putting the PS3 next to the Magnavox, Panasonic, and Samsung players) and are surrounding them with their BD disc inventory. And they've lowered the prices on many of those to be more Amazon-like. There were a few $15 titles, but most seemed to be between $18.99 and $24.99.

I got the Funai/Magnavox player a couple of weeks ago. The Toshiba is staying in my setup too, so I'm purple.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-04-2008 12:41 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
More about the Wal-Mart deal:

Wal-Mart pushing sales of Blu-ray players

quote: Reuters
Tue Jun 3, 2008 3:43pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - With the high definition DVD format war settled, Wal-Mart Stores Inc is now aggressively promoting sales of Blu-ray players.

The world's largest retailer said on Tuesday that from June 8-14, it is offering a $100 Wal-Mart gift card with the purchase of any Blu-ray player in its stores.

Wal-Mart has also increased the brands of Blu-ray players it sells, adding Magnavox, Samsung and Panasonic, and it will sell select Blu-ray movie titles for $15 starting June 8, including "3:10 to Yuma", "Shooter" and "300".

Until earlier this year, consumers who were seeking sharper movies on high-definition DVDs had to choose between two competing standards -- the Blu-ray high-definition DVD format, developed by Sony Corp and the rival HD DVD camp, which was backed by Toshiba Corp.

The competing standards stalled the shift to the new technology in the $24 billion home DVD market as consumers, worried they would be stuck with obsolete technology, avoided buying the players.

But in February, Wal-Mart said it planned to exclusively back the Blu-ray format and later that month, Toshiba said it would end its HD DVD business.

Wal-Mart, which has been working to boost sales of consumer electronics, also said on Tuesday it has completed the redesign of its consumer electronics department in stores nationwide.

The redesigned departments include more space for consumers to test video games, an expanded selection of GPS navigation products, a new display center for computers and a bigger selection of high-definition TVs.

(Reporting by Nicole Maestri; editing by Maureen Bavdek)

I'll repeat that Wal-Mart is already offering some deeply discounted Blu-ray movies at its web site. Customers have to wait a few more days for those prices to be applied to BDs in the retail stores. The $100 gift card deal is pretty interesting. I wonder if Playstation 3 consoles are included.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-04-2008 01:55 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Does Wal*Mart still sell only censored movies? I remember that they used to offer only movies with all of the violence, nudity, sex and evil cussing taken out. I never bought movies at Wal*Mart because I didn't want censored versions.

 |  IP: Logged

Shane Cooper
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 232
From: Little Rock, Arkansas
Registered: Jun 2004


 - posted 06-04-2008 02:49 AM      Profile for Shane Cooper   Email Shane Cooper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't think that Wal Mart is still censoring videos, (at least not all of them), anymore. I bought Sunshine on BR and Sweeney Todd at the same time at my local Wal Mart. Both were fully intact.

I live in a dry county [Frown] in Arkansas so I imagine if they sell them complete here that is happening most places!

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-04-2008 05:10 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Oh geez Shane, wow. Are you ok? Do you need someone to come pick you up and get you out of that place? [Eek!]

 |  IP: Logged

Larry Myers
Master Film Handler

Posts: 371
From: Herndon, VA, USA
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 06-04-2008 07:12 AM      Profile for Larry Myers         Edit/Delete Post 
Maybe it me but I see the DVD's themselves being variable. On my DVD-HD projection system, the very best for now is "Phantom of the Opera" in HD_DVD. To me it looks like I have a 70mm system in the house. Then the very worst in SD-DVD, "Greatest Story Ever Told" which is in 2.75 70mm. It is so bad it's almost unwatchable.

The new director cut of "The Exorcist" in SD-DVD looks great and almost looks HD. One reason I am sure is because the image needs less magnification on the screen for a 1.85 image.

A HD-DVD of "2001" in 2.20 also looks great but not as good as Phantom of the Opera in sharpness and tone quality and it was originally shot in standard 70mm.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 105 pages: 1  2  3  ...  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  ...  103  104  105 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.