Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE
Topic Closed  Topic Closed


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Hey you, you suck! (AKA: Outing bad film handlers) (Page 66)

 
This topic comprises 100 pages: 1  2  3  ...  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  ...  98  99  100 
 
Author Topic: Hey you, you suck! (AKA: Outing bad film handlers)
Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 01-27-2005 01:15 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Richard Greco
wound it wrong?

If the film is wound with soundtrack inboard, base out and being heads up, this reel, or print, was broken down on a Christie MUT, for the reel direction of those MUTS winds anti-clockwise for rewind.

What the operator, using these Christie MUTs, needs to do when breaking down a print, is to have the soundtrack inboard, facing the roller pole to counter this reverse winding, so the film can look to be wound soundtrack outboard and base inward on a normal heads up wind.

The Christie MUT has the reel spindle on the left side of the unit, not as on top of the deck as with the STRONG and the SPECO (Drive-in) LP-271's.

The other MUTS winds in the normal, or clockwise with soundtrack up (as with the STRONG, or the LP-271' MUTS like you have), thus it looks like the prints are being wound correctly - like ready to be placed in the upper magazine of a reel machine.

I agree with Brad also, TEC doesn't care how the wind is on the reel, as long as the leaders are attached and in order, so they don't belong in the "you suck" department.

Hope this clears this up some, for I've ran into these reverse Christie winds before on print arrivals from both ETS and TECH, in as well working with the Christie MUTS.

good luck-Monte

[ 01-27-2005, 04:05 AM: Message edited by: Monte L Fullmer ]

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 01-27-2005 09:43 AM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What's the big deal? If you don't like the soundtrack orientation, you just half-twist it and you're done, right? Am I (a changeover projectionist) missing some MUT sublety?

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 01-27-2005 11:24 AM      Profile for Darryl Spicer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Monte L Fullmer
If the film is wound with soundtrack inboard, base out and being heads up, this reel, or print, was broken down on a Christie MUT, for the reel direction of those MUTS winds anti-clockwise for rewind.

What the operator, using these Christie MUTs, needs to do when breaking down a print, is to have the soundtrack inboard, facing the roller pole to counter this reverse winding, so the film can look to be wound soundtrack outboard and base inward on a normal heads up wind.

The Christie MUT has the reel spindle on the left side of the unit, not as on top of the deck as with the STRONG and the SPECO (Drive-in) LP-271's.

The other MUTS winds in the normal, or clockwise with soundtrack up (as with the STRONG, or the LP-271' MUTS like you have), thus it looks like the prints are being wound correctly - like ready to be placed in the upper magazine of a reel machine.

If you are pulling the film off the platter correctly, that is when you bring the film off to the first roller of the mutt. The soundtrack should always be away from you or close to the pole that holds the rollers. Doing this prevents the film from having a grating effect against the platter surface. On a christie mutt that spins counter clockwise, this puts the soundtrack in the correct wind on the reel with no twist. The soundtrack will be away from you on the finished reel.

On the newer Speco mutts the mutt spins in the clockwise direction requiring you to put a twist in the film to get it to wind with the soundtrack close to you on the finished reel.

quote:
Hey, whomever wound my print of Alone In The Dark during the WONDERFUL inspection process at TES, YOU SUCK!!!

Mine came the same way. I used to use the old wooden tables and my advice to you if you are not doing it already is to never use the damn rollers on that piece of shit. I would just make the film up straight to the center platter adjusting the hieght of the table to allow the film to properly run on. I know with the drive-in opperation you have two prints so just move it to the top and put the next one on or if they are smaller titles not very long run both of them on back to back. Put some back tension on the reel to prevent it from winding to loose. This beats those croppy rollers if they are still on the damn thing. I would break down the same way too. Center platter only. Also never be paying out from the bottom while breaking down from the center. Unless you want a hell of a brain wrap.

 |  IP: Logged

Jason Gazaille
Film Handler

Posts: 46
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 01-27-2005 08:36 PM      Profile for Jason Gazaille   Email Jason Gazaille   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In my history of building, most all Lion's Gate films are wound on backwards like that. Godsend, Fahrenheit 9/11, and Shattered Glass were all like that. I can't remember if the Artisan prints like The Punisher were also. Just expect it from LGF.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-27-2005 08:56 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
ACtually the proper method specified in the SMPTE recomended practice is emulsion in

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-27-2005 09:05 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
And as always I will chime in after Gordon and clarify that the SMPTE recommendation is 3 decades old and was based upon filmstocks that are no longer in use.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 01-28-2005 05:36 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, the study of preferred winding orientation done by Paul Preo of Kodak was based on triacetate prints. With polyester prints, anecdotal evidence seems to show that the best winding orientation is more humidity dependent, so use whatever works best (best focus stability, least tendency for "static cling") in your situation and on your equipment. Definitely use the largest core or reel hub diameter possible to minimize "core set".

Here's is the Preo SMPTE paper:

http://www.film-tech.com/warehouse/wareview.php?id=1027&category=2

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-28-2005 03:31 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have found that poly stock reacts the same and focus is more stable when wound emulsion in and I beleieve steve noticed the same

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-28-2005 05:31 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
And there are plenty of people who have also observed that winding exclusively emulsion out maintains superior focus and the film doesn't suffer from warping over time.

Gordon, the only reason I pick on you for this is because you quote SMPTE's completely outdated and useless paper every time. If you just mentioned that you have personally noticed it to be better one way or another, I wouldn't always be having to clarify things for the general public in reference to them thinking that SMPTE actually has a valid and current paper on the issue. [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-28-2005 08:52 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
See, see now...this is how it all starts....we have a perfectly fine platter bickering arguement going on here and you drag a reel-to-reel issue into it...never mind that it is going to run better on reels no matter which way you orient the emulsion [Wink]

I mean really...keep your silly platter problems to yourselves [Cool]

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 01-28-2005 08:57 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It's not like emulsion orientation is tied to a specific soundtrack orientation. Steve, I'm waiting for the RP39 reference [Smile]

Pick only two: Emulsion orientation, Soundtrack orientation, Head-out/Tail-out.

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-28-2005 09:21 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Emulsion out/head out. That pretty much gets the soundtrack in the proper orientation anyway! [Confused] [Razz]

 |  IP: Logged

Dominic Espinosa
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1172
From: California, U.S.A.
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 01-30-2005 11:43 AM      Profile for Dominic Espinosa   Email Dominic Espinosa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hey, Watsonville Greenvalley 6 you suck!

Now, before the rant, please pardon my poor quality phone-cam pictures...

Here's the head leader of R1, R1 meanwhile is missing about 150' at the beginning.
Of course the leader on R1 was the only one attached to the right end of the reel. All the others were tail on the head and head on the tail. I bet it came tail out and the idiots who built it didn't put the leaders in the right place for breakdown.

 -

The last 100' of R3 of course was on the head of R4 which made identifying them much more fun. This made it much more fun.
I love this yellow crap!
 -

Another interesting note about the leaders is all, but the tail of R1 pictured above, the leader was spliced back on with a double sided splice. How about that?

And let's also not forget the tag on the tail...
It read "Finding Nemo Neverland" with the nemo part scratched out slightly.

In addition to the mound of masking tape that reached nearly 2 full inches when stacked there was also some human hair tangled into it...yay!

And another great example of splicing gone wrong...
R3, R4, and R4 were all cut like this:
 -

And let's not forget the emulsion and base scratches ON BOTH SIDES! I hope the soundtracks still work...
Woot for competence!

 |  IP: Logged

Thomas King
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 119
From: Sheffield, Yorkshire, England
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted 01-30-2005 06:15 PM      Profile for Thomas King   Author's Homepage   Email Thomas King   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just so I'm sure: what is the correct way to make down? I always wind reels soundtrack down, winding on clockwise from the bottom, because that's the way 90% of my reels arrive. Also, How do I tell which side is the emulsion and which side is the base?

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 01-30-2005 07:38 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Woot for competence!

Welcome to in receiving prints from theatres with personnel who either don't care, or just don't know what we know.

World ain't fair, so we have to deal with it as such.

quote: Thomas King
How do I tell which side is the emulsion and which side is the base?

There are many ways to find out which side is what on the film:

1- with the film in the machine and the soundtrack where it supposed to be, the emulsion is always away from the screen, or towards the lamphouse, for 35mm. For 16mm, the soundtrack is inboard away from the individual but still emulsion out.

2-Base side is more shiner than the emulsion, which has more of a dull sheen.

3-with a wet finger, the base will not stick to your finger, whereas the emulsion loaded with the gels will be prone to stick to the wet finger.

4-The emulsion will have the contour relief of the image on the print if seen at the reflection of the surface of the film. Base stays with the shine.

5-When scratching the film, the base will just "frost" up with white shavings, whereas the emulsion shavings will be of the dye colors.

..and et.al.

Going back to emulsion wind in topic, we notice that all trailers received from either Technicolor, DeLuxe, and other labs, that the wind on the core is emulsion in, heads or tails out.

thx-Monte

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 100 pages: 1  2  3  ...  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  ...  98  99  100 
 
   Open Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.