Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Gas Prices in your area (Page 16)

 
This topic comprises 55 pages: 1  2  3  ...  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  ...  53  54  55 
 
Author Topic: Gas Prices in your area
Pete Naples
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1565
From: Dunfermline, Scotland
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 08-07-2005 01:43 PM      Profile for Pete Naples   Email Pete Naples   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Governments who build their countries economic system on taxes raised in the name of environmental protection are what pushes up prices Randy, the treasuries are rubbing their hands every time that Hummer fills up. It's somewhat short sighted, ok when you price fuel out of the reach of all but the rich, what happens? All that revenue ceases pouring into the states coffers, and the house of cards built on it collapses. It's the same reason they don't really want you to give up smoking and drinking.

I'd love not have to use my car almost everywhere I go, but certainly in the UK there is no viable alternative. Public transport is unreliable, expensive, doesn't serve a lot of the community and is unsafe. I find the current UK taxation scheme on company cars particularly unfair for people like me. I cannot do my job without a vehicle, there is no way I can carry me and all the tools, test kit etc from place to place any other way. I didn't ask for the car, I don't use it when not working, yet I'm taxed to the hilt, in essence I pay do to do my job! I have no beef with taxing people who are given a flash car, have fuel provided for them and drive 1 1/4 miles to and from work each day, but for someone like me who is provided with a modest vehicle, only gets fuel for business use paid for and has to drive hundreds of miles a day it seems a tad unbalanced.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 08-07-2005 05:48 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Pete Naples
Governments who build their countries economic system on taxes raised in the name of environmental protection are what pushes up prices. [...] Randy, the treasuries are rubbing their hands every time that Hummer fills up.
An increase in energy taxation is really an increase in direct taxation in all but name. As far as road fuel goes, even if you don't drive yourself you will buy goods which have been delivered by lorry and you will buy the services of people who have to drive to work.

quote: Pete Naples
It's somewhat short sighted, ok when you price fuel out of the reach of all but the rich, what happens? All that revenue ceases pouring into the states coffers, and the house of cards built on it collapses.
I'm not entirely sure I agree there: burning fossil fuel energy is something which is essential for survival in a developed world country: so if the price goes up (either due to market forces or taxation), people are going to cut back on other sorts of consumer spending. For example, now that gas price increases have put a tenner or so on my quarterly bill, I'm going to find that money by not going to the pub one night or not buying a book or a DVD or two: I won't be finding it by letting the flat go cold in winter. Likewise, I have to get to work, so if the price of LPG goes up, I'll just have to pay it and cut back on non-essential spending. So the state continues to get its cut: though granted, it may then lose some of that in the form of lower VAT on other spending.

quote: Pete Naples
It's the same reason they don't really want you to give up smoking and drinking.
Agreed entirely. If it's agreed that tobacco is an unacceptably destructive drug, why faff around with a taxation system to offset the financial cost of its health effects and silly laws that ban you from smoking in pubs, apart from those which don't serve food; and just outlaw the stuff? Probably because that would be a hellish difficult law to enforce: people would just smuggle tobacco in from Europe, just as they smuggled booze across the border from Canada when the United States bought in prohibition in the '20s. But even so, there are obviously double standards going on.

 |  IP: Logged

David Buckley
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 525
From: Oxford, N. Canterbury, New Zealand
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted 08-07-2005 08:13 PM      Profile for David Buckley   Author's Homepage   Email David Buckley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Guys, the purposes of governments are to take money from everyone and use it for purposes they decide. Theres nothing 'fair'or 'equitible', its where they chose to grab the cash from.

quote: Pete Naples
... treasuries are rubbing their hands every time that Hummer fills up. It's somewhat short sighted, ok when you price fuel out of the reach of all but the rich, what happens?
What happens is "demand destruction" and is a necessary step towards balancing the supply side and the demand side. Prior to that happening there will be lots of people for whom the choice will be fuel or food, and once they cant afford fuel they cant get to work. As usual, it is those with least money upon whom this will fall the hardest and the soonest.

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Macaulay
Film God

Posts: 2321
From: Toronto, Canada
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 08-07-2005 08:57 PM      Profile for Dave Macaulay   Email Dave Macaulay   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Why should some asshole be allowed to use FIVE TIMES MORE GAS than me and get away with it, simply because he can afford it!?
Looks like you answered your own question.

 |  IP: Logged

Kelly Skaggs
Film Handler

Posts: 68
From: Springdale UT
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 08-08-2005 06:21 PM      Profile for Kelly Skaggs   Author's Homepage   Email Kelly Skaggs   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well today in Greater Cincinnati the gas prices have hit $2.50 a gallon. They have gone up .35 cents in less then a week. [puke]

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-08-2005 08:20 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, if they can afford the gas then they can afford to pay the exicse tax. Can't they?

If it wasn't for the fact that the government let the auto makers weasel them into classifying S.U.V.s as "Trucks" instead of "Passenger Vehicles" they WOULD be subject to minimum fuel mileage standards and we probably would be in this situation in the first place. OR at least, the situation wouldn't be as bad as it is.

How about we set the price of gas according to the formula:

$17.00/gal. - (average highway mileage of the vehicle * 0.5)

The computer in the pump scans the bar code under the V.I.N. sticker near the fuel filler cap then sets the price according to a preprogrammed database of vehicle mileage statistics.

Any attempt to thwart the system results in permanent revocation of the vehicle's registration privileges. Vehicles used to make "Straw Purchases" are also subject to revocation.

Okay. I realize how unrealistic that is but it's a dramatic way to illustrate my point. People who drive gas guzzlers decrease the supply of gasoline for others and drive up prices. Putting some kind of punitive measure in place for gas guzzling vehicles would:

A) Slow the growth of sales of gas guzzling vehicles.
B) Lower gas prices for EVERYBODY.
C) Decrease pollution. (Gas guzzlers usually pollute more, too.)

It's a Win-Win situation, AFAIC. The government tried to do it 25 years ago, the LAST time we had gas shortages but they let the auto makers weasel them into relaxing the standards.

We need to put those laws back in place to make up for lost time!

Oh! And FLEET VEHICLES should get tax breaks! Sharing vehicles is good for gas consumption, reduces the number of cars on the road AND reduces pollution REGARDLESS of the average fuel mileage of the vehicle in question. DOUBLE tax breaks for fleet vehicles which meet minimum fuel mileage standards would be even BETTER!

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 08-08-2005 11:05 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
87 octane in Lawton relaxed a bit over the latter part of last week and through the weekend to $2.29 per gallon. To start off the work week, it kicked up to $2.38 per gallon. That's an all time high for this area.

Crude oil hit $64 per barrel today. The stock market still isn't reacting much. Add a few more dollars and I think the economy will. There's a lot of other stuff that has been getting too pricey. Gasoline prices are just a highly visible tipping point. You can't drive through your town without seeing some gas price changer sign reminding you of the expense.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 08-09-2005 03:36 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Driving into work just now there was an interesting piece on the Today programme (you can hear it here, though this link will only be good for 24 hours from the date of this post), asking why the oil price rises dont' seem to have buggered the British economy in the way that they did during the last spike in the '70s. The tentative conclusions were (i) interest rates are a lot lower, which are holding off the inflationary pressures which exacerbated the effect of oil price rises then, (ii) fierce competition, especially from India and China, is preventing retailers from passing on energy price rises to consumers in manufactured goods, and (iii) the slowdown in some parts of the economy caused by more expensive oil is being offet by the higher profits of oil companies, which is keeping the stock market healthy.

The only real sign of trouble ahead is that house prices are either flatlining or going down slightly, depending on whose figures you believe. But given that they've inflated so far out of line with earnings in the last 9 years, that had to happen anyway. To be honest I can't really work out why higher fuel prices don't seem to have hit other sectors of the economy. People only earn so much, and if they are pouring a higher proportion of it into their cars, then surely they must be spending less elsewhere. If I hadn't had my car converted to run on LPG last November (which is rapidly starting to look like the best investment I ever made), I reckon I'd be paying around £150 a month on petrol, compared to £110-120 at the time I converted my car (the monthly LPG bill comes in at around £65 [Cool] ). So I'd have had to save that by cutting back on leisure spending.

Something doesn't seem right, and I'm not sure what.

 |  IP: Logged

David Buckley
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 525
From: Oxford, N. Canterbury, New Zealand
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted 08-09-2005 06:56 AM      Profile for David Buckley   Author's Homepage   Email David Buckley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Perhaps the British economy isn't buggered yet.

I cant recall the UK prices for fuel back in the '70s, but both the barrel price and the US pump price has yet to reach the 70s price after inflation is taken into account.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 08-11-2005 12:07 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Crude oil hit $66 per barrel today.
[Mad]

quote: Leo Enticknap
To be honest I can't really work out why higher fuel prices don't seem to have hit other sectors of the economy. People only earn so much, and if they are pouring a higher proportion of it into their cars, then surely they must be spending less elsewhere.
Here's what all the money chasing MBAs don't want people to mention: many millions of Americans are paying their bills with borrowed money and equity cashed out of their homes. The pricing structure of our economy has very wrongfully changed to assume that money is real income when it is extremely the reverse. People in the United States now have the lowest level of savings since the Great Depression.

The insane run up in home prices is largely due to speculators trading property like they were trading baseball cards. Truly, prices in most markets in the United States are hyper-inflated far beyond what the market would actually bear if we were talking about mortgages supported by real income. Our whole damned economy is effectively on a credit card. It's going to be ugly when that housing market bubble pops. You're going to see lots of people "upside down" owing a lot more money than their house is actually worth.

Speculation, rather than market reality, has pushed oil to very wrong, over priced levels. This is another bubble that can pop. I hope some of those folks rolling in oil drilling rights royalty money don't go changing their lifestyles as if that extra income is going to be dependable. I don't think it will be there (at least at these levels) for much longer.

 |  IP: Logged

Bob Maar
(Maar stands for Maartini)


Posts: 28608
From: New York City & Newport, RI
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 08-11-2005 02:59 PM      Profile for Bob Maar   Author's Homepage   Email Bob Maar   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
On the upper Eastside of Manhattan they are getting $2.87 per gallon for octane 87. In Rhode Island I pay $2.43 for the same gallon.

 |  IP: Logged

Jon Miller
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 973
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 08-11-2005 03:30 PM      Profile for Jon Miller   Email Jon Miller   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As I write this I am on vacation in Northern California for a few days, enjoying a little breather in the town of Danville after attending a conference in San Francisco. Since I don't fly and didn't want to make the trip in my thirsty F-150, I rented a Ford Focus. Thirty MPG on the freeway ain't bad (well, compared to the pickup truck anyway).

When I left San Diego last Saturday, I topped off the Focus at $2.619 a gallon for regular at a neighborhood Arco station. Two-hundred fifty miles later...another Arco station, this time in Buttonwillow (off Interstate 5 in the middle of California's produce department and summertime pizza oven known as the San Joaquin Valley [Smile] ), $2.559/gallon.

Arco's usually one of the least expensive major gasoline brands, but apparently not here in Danville. Try $2.819/gallon for regular, up to $3.019/gallon for super. Other brands of gas are just as steep. [Eek!] [Eek!] [Eek!] Guess I won't be filling up here...

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 08-11-2005 03:36 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bobby: very interesting. You could substitute 'America' for 'Britain' in your last post and it would almost all be just as true.

quote: Bobby Henderson
Here's what all the money chasing MBAs don't want people to mention: many millions of Americans are paying their bills with borrowed money and equity cashed out of their homes. [...] People in the United States now have the lowest level of savings since the Great Depression.
It made the news earlier this year when Britain's total consumer debt busted the £1 trillion mark. Savings have also slumped. The reasons given for this vary. Opponents of the present government point to a big increase on the taxation on personal pensions introduced when it came to power in 1997, while others point to lower stock market returns (especially after the dot com bubble burst in 2000) and higher property prices encouraging people to regard their house as their retirement fund.

But, mortgage lending aside, I just can't figure out why this credit-led spending binge has gone on for so long and shows no sign of slowing. Surely, sooner or later people will reach the limit on their credit cards, or see that an extra fiver a week on their petrol bill is adding up, and decide that it's reality check time? Not yet, it seems.

quote: Bobby Henderson
The insane run up in home prices is largely due to speculators trading property like they were trading baseball cards. Truly, prices in most markets in the United States are hyper-inflated far beyond what the market would actually bear if we were talking about mortgages supported by real income.
This is where the difference comes, I think, although it's true that mortgage lending has gone up. It used to be said that a sensible level of mortgage lending was three times someone's annual income. Well, a very basic one-bedroom apartment in my neighbourhood costs 5-6 times my annual income. Unless there's a crash, there's no way I could ever afford to buy: and if there is a crash, the economy will be so well and truly sodomised that I will probably no longer have a job to pay the mortgage with! But I think that the house price increases here are supported by real money: money which has flowed out of the stock market and other forms of investment over the last 7-9 years and into residential property. The problem is that this shift seriously damaged our manufacturing industry (albeit indirectly) and locked those of my generation, and the one behind me, which don't have the capital to invest in the first place, out of the market.

quote: Bobby Henderson
The pricing structure of our economy has very wrongfully changed to assume that money is real income when it is extremely the reverse.
Agreed totally, and one thing I don't hear talked about is that the era of low interest rates is making that worse. During the last housing boom and bust of the late '80s/early '90s, interest rates were running at the 10-15% mark. So the real value of people's mortgages relative to their income was being eroded year by year. Now that rates are pretty much stable in the 3-5% bracket, they aren't. The average Brit's mortgage payment, especially for those who bought during the recent boom, is likely to be a higher proportion of their real income for a lot longer.

quote: Bobby Henderson
Our whole damned economy is effectively on a credit card. It's going to be ugly when that housing market bubble pops. You're going to see lots of people "upside down" owing a lot more money than their house is actually worth.
That's what happened in the early '90s here, which ushered the term 'negative equity' (mortgage value exceeding market value of property) into the dictionary. The big fear is, of course, of this happening again. The housing market is in a bit of a 'phoney war' at the moment: prices are effectively static, but, worryingly, the number of properties changing hands is plummeting. Because, as yet, unemployment hasn't risen significantly (we avoided a recession, unlike most other European markets, because of a healthy consumer and service sector), so people don't need to move. So if they're not getting what they're asking for their houses, they're just not selling. But if, for whatever reason, these people are forced to sell, then it logically follows that the UK economy will go TU very quickly.

quote: Bobby Henderson
Speculation, rather than market reality, has pushed oil to very wrong, over priced levels.
Especially since it's reported that the supply problem is caused by limited refining capacity, not limited crude availability. If anything I'd have thought that should push the cost of crude down, since there's no point in buying it if you then have to store it for a long time before it can be processed.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 08-11-2005 04:03 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Leo Enticknap
But, mortgage lending aside, I just can't figure out why this credit-led spending binge has gone on for so long and shows no sign of slowing.
The reason is people are spending out all their home equity. Their houses rise in value on paper, but those folks are spending it all in real cash. Speculators keep on pushing housing prices farther and father into the stratosphere and the average American is spending the cash like a junky hooked on heroin. They just can't stop.

As interest rates keep creeping higher and higher that's going to finally put a lid on this skyrocketing housing prices. Those people will have no more equity to spend. And they'll have a ton of bills they have no way to pay.

I would expect to see a spike in bancruptcies, repossessions, estate liquidations and especially divorces.

On the bright side, some people may make out very well even when the housing bubble bursts. But those smart few are going to be the ones who simply rolled all that extra equity into other more stable investments. Or you might have an elderly guy with no heirs who properly set up a reverse mortage to use the gravy for living costs. There's lots of reverse mortgages that are outright scams however.

Anyway, whenver these feared bubbles pop I sure don't want to be one of the folks drowning in debt at that time. I have very little debt to speak of, but that's only because I'm living humbly well within my means.

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Mehocic
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 804
From: New Castle, PA, USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-13-2005 07:50 PM      Profile for Aaron Mehocic   Email Aaron Mehocic   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
$2.45 for regular unleaded both east and west of the Penn-Ohio line.

quote: Leo Enticknap
It used to be said that a sensible level of mortgage lending was three times someone's annual income
I went for a mortgage this past April and that is the general rule the realtor used for me when I first began to look at some properties. In my neck of the woods you can find a solid home in a nice neighborhood with a good school for under $100,000. My mortgage is only $50 more than what I was paying to rent, so we're not seeing the mind-numbing increases that folks in other parts (albeit more wealthier parts) of the nation are seeing. I paid about 130% of my yearly gross income for a ranch-style home approximately 40 - 45 years old. The interest rate on my loan is 5.25%. I believe that what I got for the price paid was well worth it.

quote: Bobby Henderson
People in the United States now have the lowest level of savings since the Great Depression.
. . . and has been since the early 1990's. When I first started working for pay on a local farm at age 14 my parents required me to put 80% of my net in the bank. This soon built up a small nest egg that actually helped bridge the gap between what my college loans paid out and the actual tuition of the college I attended. Friends and co-workers were very suprised at this. So to were some adults and even an economics teacher at my high school. People somehow believed that by sacrificing myself from the newest fashions or latest CD I wasn't the "normal" kid. Not to be political, but when the Treasury Department sent me my $300 refund after the Bush election, mine went into the bank where it still sits today. I think the two biggest reasons why nobody saves today like in past generations is:
Availability of easy credit.
Relaxed bankruptcy laws.
Or in other words, live for the moment because somebody else can always bail you out.

Gone are the days of individualism . . .

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 55 pages: 1  2  3  ...  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  ...  53  54  55 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.