Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » The "What makes me go insane!" thread (Page 20)

 
This topic comprises 45 pages: 1  2  3  ...  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  ...  43  44  45 
 
Author Topic: The "What makes me go insane!" thread
Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 10-23-2009 10:56 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think the short-range aspect is exactly what makes pepper spray a bad choice. If the dog is already at high speed and close range the pepper spray could simply be useless because the dog's already gone into it's attack motion. And it could just end up making the thing angry (like if you were to shoot a grizzly with an arrow and miss the major organs).

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-23-2009 11:52 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Chad Souder
I think many people buy pit bulls because they think it will make them look cool.
Actually, it makes them look like white trash who are themselves inbred, just like their dogs.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-24-2009 02:33 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
If the officer only had a few seconds to react, I can just about guarantee you that he can pull his gun faster than he can pull his pepper spray and make sure it is pointed at the dog and not himself.

It really doesn't matter how much you love dogs. If the animal is attacking, the guy was justified to take any means he felt he had the time for to defend himself.

How would you feel if you were in that neighborhood with your child or your wife and that dog was in full motion to attack one of them?

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-24-2009 05:17 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Brad Miller
If the animal is attacking, the guy was justified to take any means he felt he had the time for to defend himself.
EXACTLY. The same thing applies to humans.

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 10-24-2009 09:21 AM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Frank Angel
People who should certainly know better who say ex cetera.
That one, and asterICK bugs the hell outta me. It's ASTERISK, as in taking a risk... not 'RICK. News people say it wrong all the time. [Mad]

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-24-2009 11:05 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There was an interesting incident with a pet owner in West Jordon, UT in late September. His kids were playing with their yellow lab in their yard when a kid delivering flyers came around. The dog was not on a leash but in their yard... and apparently STAYED in their yard the whole time. The dog began barking at the flyer delivery kid, apparently scared of the dog the kid left. He soon returned with a baseball bat and started beating the dog with it and shoved the dog owner's daughter to the ground. This all went to court and the kid got off and the judge gave the dog's owner a fine for not having the dog on a leash even though it was in it's own yard and never left. Had I been the judge it woulda certainly been different. All I can say is the kid must have been wearing his funny underwear and the dog's owner probably wasn't. Thats how it goes around here sometimes. I think it would have been the other way round in any other State.

Article

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-24-2009 11:05 AM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Regardless of the type of dog, whether it be a Chihuahua or a Pit Bull, the owner is responsible for CONTROLLING HIS DOG AT ALL TIMES while in public.

If a dog goes after a person; it doesn't matter if that person is a police officer or an ordinary "Joe," walking down the street; he has the right to do what he believes is reasonable to defend himself.

If it is a small dog, it might be reasonable for a person to simply side-step it. A larger dog might need to be kicked, punched or hit with a stick in self defense. A large dog like a Rottweiler or a type of dog that is known to be fierce will certainly require more drastic measures in self defense. I'm sorry to say that shooting might very well be the best course of action.

If it can be shown that the owner of the dog either ordered it to attack or negligently allowed the dog to attack a person, the owner is JUST AS LIABLE AS IF HE ATTACKED THE OTHER PERSON HIMSELF. Yes, a dog can be considered to be a weapon in the right (wrong?) circumstances.

As such, a police officer has the right to act according to the circumstances. It is not out of the question to think that a Pit Bull might be trained to attack policemen. I don't know all the circumstances but it is reasonable to believe that shooting the dog might have been the safest course of action.

*****

So... This gets me to one of my pet peves: People who don't control their dogs when asked.

My wife and I were walking on the beach when we came upon a guy playing with his German Shepherd at the water's edge. The dog, being friendly, came running over to greet us.

My wife is afraid of big dogs. She started to freak out.
I hollered to the guy, "Control your dog, please!" but the dog kept running toward us and the idiot owner just stood there.

I stepped between the dog and my wife, grabbed it by the collar and hoisted its front legs off the ground. The dog yelped as I dragged it back to the guy. "Control your DOG!" I shouted. "She's afraid of dogs!"

The guy tried to get huffy with me for manhandling his dog.
"Leash laws!" I replied.
My wife and I walked off. The guy just gave us dirty looks.

Personally, I would have petted the dog when it came up but Melanie was having a shit-fit. I did what was reasonable under the circumstance.

It's a lucky thing she wasn't by herself! Melanie has a Concealed Carry Permit and she packs heat. If I wasn't with her, she very well might have shot that dog!

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-24-2009 11:39 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Another incident just yesterday. They said on last night's news that this little kid will probably have to have part of his face removed. HE is still too young for plastic surgery.
Article

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-24-2009 12:08 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Site rules on news stories Mark...

quote:
Dog mauls child in West Valley

By Nate Carlisle

The Salt Lake Tribune
Updated: 10/23/2009 06:39:26 PM MDT

A pit bull bit and seriously injured a 5-year-old boy Friday in West Valley City.

The dog bit the boy on the face and head, said West Valley City police Lt. Dalan Taylor. A helicopter flew the boy to Primary Children's Medical Center.

The "attack," as Taylor called it, happened about 5 p.m. near 3000 S. Ray St. (4175 West). The boy lives across the street from the dog's owner and both the 5-year-old and the animal were on the street a few houses down.

Taylor said police had not yet found a witness to the attack and do not know what, if anything, spurred the dog to bite. The dog's owner said the dog was in a kennel and on a leash in a fenced yard when he left for work in the morning and does not know how the dog got loose.

Animal control officers took possession of the dog and are investigating the case. Taylor said no citations have been issued.

The dog needs to be put down. I don't care if it was the only time the dog ever attacked someone, there shouldn't be a "three strikes" policy on this sort of shit.

And how odd, yet again it was a pit bull. THAT is probably why the officer said to himself "screw this, its a pit bull" and shot the dog in the earlier article. That poor kid will now have to live with his new face for the rest of his life, not to mention whatever damage that may or may not have done to him mentally being attacked like that.

Why is it people cannot have ferrets as a pet but having a historically dangerous pit bull is ok?

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-24-2009 01:34 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad,

I agree 100%. There IS no excuse for this type of dog being at large. In the other case however the flier delivery kid returned and attacked the owner's dog on the owner's property. To me that is more of a case of not only trespassing but animal cruelty and probably falls under some criminal act law.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Chad Souder
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 962
From: Waterloo, IA, USA
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 10-24-2009 02:15 PM      Profile for Chad Souder   Email Chad Souder   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
And what about the neglectful parents? If defenseless 5 year olds allowed to wander around in public unsupervised is the standard, then all dogs of all breeds that are seen off leash should be shot on sight. No questions asked.

I'm not saying a dog never needs to be put down. My grandfather had to shoot his old German Shepard farm dog years ago when my 8 year old niece went to pet it while he was sleeping. The dog was startled and nipped her through her upper lip. She turned out fine but it's sad because it could have been avoided.

This video kind of goes along with the point I'm trying to make. They should have shot the owner.

Here's one of an officer who kept his cool. The dog needs to be removed from it's owner who clearly is incapable of control.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 10-24-2009 02:17 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The flier kid should have been charged with trespass and everything else. He CAME BACK TO BEAT THE DOG!!!!!

Change this to a homicide. What is the difference between a person shooting another person in the heat of the moment and a person that goes, gets the gun, comes back and then shoots. In court it is HUGE the difference...one is 1st degree murder.

However something rings fishy about this case. They state that it was clearly self-defense. Nobody goes, gets a weapon, comes back in a self-defense case. Certainly a lawyer would pursue that for their client so I'm not sure we have the full story here.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 10-24-2009 03:20 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Chad Souder
And what about the neglectful parents? If defenseless 5 year olds allowed to wander around in public unsupervised is the standard, then all dogs of all breeds that are seen off leash should be shot on sight. No questions asked.
Can you say "non sequitur"?

1)No one suggested that all dogs that could CONCEIVABLY cause damage to a person needs to be put down. The suggestion regarding pit bulls is specifically because that breed has a clear history of causing damage.

2) The discussion has been about shooting a dog that is actually attacking someone. Using that and saying "No surprise it was a pit bull" isn't a suggestion that dogs not attacking people should be shot.

 |  IP: Logged

Rick Raskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1100
From: Manassas Virginia
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 10-24-2009 03:44 PM      Profile for Rick Raskin   Email Rick Raskin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The flier kid should be charged with criminal trespass and assault & battery. They could also throw in a weapons charge since he used a bat to do the deed. No question the act was premeditated, hence my view that there was criminal intent.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 10-24-2009 03:46 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't currently own a dog, but if some jerk made the choice to walk on to my property to beat a dog on my front lawn with a baseball bat, I would probably get a gun and shoot that asshole. Then I would tell the cops, "he brazenly walked on my property armed with a baseball bat and beat my dog. I thought I was next. I was in fear for my life, officer." Honestly, that's really what I would think. A baseball bat is a deadly weapon. People do get bludgeoned to death with hard objects swung as a weapon.

We have the "make my day" and "stand your ground" laws in effect here in Oklahoma. You have the right to absolute safety on your own property.

A couple of weeks ago, nearby in Cache, OK, Martha and Carl Miller were murdered by some asshole (29 year old Mica Martinez of Indiahoma) who happened to be free on bail under a charge of aggravated assault on another woman.

Before dawn, this character was shooting a 30-30 rifle from his car while parked in a semi-rural neighborhood west of Lawton. Investigators believe Carl Miller went outside to see why someone would be firing a gun. Coyotes maybe? Martinez confronted Carl Miller, attacking him by using the 30-30 rifle like a club. Carl Miller was left laying unresponsive in his driveway. Martinez then entered the Miller home through an open garage door. He found Martha Miller sleeping in her bedroom. Martinez beat her repeatedly with the rifle. He may have sexually assaulted her as well.

The Millers' son, Shawn Monk (aged in his 30's), had spent the night and was sleeping in another room. At first he thought the noises he was hearing was from the Millers' TV set. Carl would sometimes watch TV in the middle of the night when he couldn't sleep. Shawn got up to check out things and found Mica Martinez leaving the bedroom. The two immediately started fighting. Shawn Monk suffered injuries to his head and body in the process of over-powering Martinez and getting control of the rifle. He then called 9-11 before Martinez got up to continue fighting and try to escape. When deputies from the Comanche County Sheriff's Dept. arrived they found Shawn Monk and Mica Martinez in the kitchen still fighting. Monk was bleeding profusely from his head wounds.

Deputies found Martha Miller in her bedroom, still alive, but in very critical condition. She died hours later at Comanche County Memorial Hospital. Three days later, Carl Miller died of his injuries. He never regained consciousness. Carl died the day of Martha Miller's funeral. The Comanche County D.A. charged Mica Martinez with two counts of first degree murder and two counts of assault. Martinez was denied bond. It looks very likely that, if convicted, Martinez will face the death penalty.

Onto the stuff about pit bulls.

I agree 100% that it is a very sad thing for a police officer to have to shoot a pit bull charging at him at full speed. In that circumstance I mentioned earlier, the officer really didn't have a choice.

Pepper spray can be very messy stuff. You'll only avoid getting that crap on you in a lucky, perfect encounter. There is no guarantee it will stop the dog either. You have only one chance with trying to use a tazer, and a fast running dog would be hard to hit. Chances are better you'll stop an attacking dog with a few shots fired from a .45 caliber Glock.

Overall, the culture of pit bull ownership is pretty damned screwy.

I don't know how it is in some places, but around Lawton most pit bull owners look like white trash tweekers. Not that they're on crank, but they do look like meth heads. Lots of irresponsible, scummy people gravitate to owning pit bulls. I personally know a few people who own pit bulls, and nearly all of those folks are a bit on the trashy side. They have problems. The only one who doesn't is a coworker who is also a former police officer. He rescued a pit bull from a busted dog fighting operation. His dog, Molly, was used as a bait dog. Other dogs would attack her savagely. It's common for smaller pit bulls to be used in this manner. It's also common for dog fighters to steal other people's pets to use as pit bull bait (the stolen dogs are often killed). Molly recovered from her physical wounds, but has been left all but permanently traumatized. Molly is scared of everything. She won't even go outside to pee without someone coming outside with her. Pretty damned sad.

On the topic of "what makes me go insane," I have nothing but absolute contempt for anyone who uses pit bull dogs to fight. I judge them to be deviant perverts who get their rocks off on cruelty. The same goes for anyone attending dog fights and/or betting on the outcome. They are lower than that sludge which accumulates at the bottom of a rotting garbage dumpster on a hot 100° day.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 45 pages: 1  2  3  ...  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  ...  43  44  45 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.