Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » The "What makes me go insane!" thread (Page 21)

 
This topic comprises 45 pages: 1  2  3  ...  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  ...  43  44  45 
 
Author Topic: The "What makes me go insane!" thread
Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-24-2009 07:07 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve-Rick... I agree with you both however its a prime example of the lopsidedness here in You-Taw Government in that those who wear funny underwear around here typically get off while those who don't get the shaft. It happens all the time! A number of the comments in the Salt Lake Tribune made after the article hit suggested the dog owner begin a civil lawsuit against the flier kid... I don't know if the dog's owner ever did that or not. I certainly would have, it would have included the Flier company as well!

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 10-24-2009 08:11 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Chris Slycord
Can you say "non sequitur"?
quote: Chris in another thread
Can you say "nonsequitur"?
quote: Chris in another thread
Can you say "non sequitur"?
How's it go again?

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 10-24-2009 08:30 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
[Razz]

Webster's says it is pronounced as "\ˈnän-ˈse-kwə-tər also -ˌtu̇r\"

 |  IP: Logged

Chad Souder
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 962
From: Waterloo, IA, USA
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 10-24-2009 10:06 PM      Profile for Chad Souder   Email Chad Souder   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark - [thumbsup] Some guys just have the one barrel.

My point was that an unsupervised 5 year old allowed to wander around outside could get hurt or killed any number of ways. It's awful that he was attacked by a poorly trained dog, but had it been a rabid skunk or raccoon or whatever may be wild on the streets of Utah, people would be asking the parents where they were. Like with Bobby's original story, the only one I know wasn't at fault here is the dog. The dog's owner and the parents of the child need to come under heavy interrogation.

Bobby - I agree completely about your description of most pit bull owners. They look the same around here. It's not the breed's fault. I personally never buy purebreds - I have adopted all mixed breeds from the Humane Society - but while breeds may be predisposed to certain behaviors, it takes specific nurturing to bring out those behaviors and specific nurturing to keep them suppressed. Any breed can be taught to attack - some are just a lot better at it. Regarding Molly, she can be cured. Dogs very much live in the moment. They remember behaviors during which they were given affection and repeat those behaviors. They become dominant when nobody dominates them. It sounds like Molly was either traumatized then given affection to calm her down, which reinforced her current state of fear, or had nobody to be dominant after her trauma so she became her own leader. Either way, her owner isn't acting as a truly dominant owner and correcting her behavior - don't worry it's very common and I was the same not long ago. I am a HUGE fan of Dog Whisperer with Cesar Millan. Yes, it's a cheesy title and he works with prissy celebrities and it seems to good to be true but his philosophy and methods work. I have completely transformed the behavior of my dogs just by following what he suggests and they are happier for it. The biggest problem is that people treat their dogs too much like their damn kids. They are not people and should not be treated as such. The owner needs to be the alpha. I would highly recommend the show to your coworker. It's on Nat-Geo, so many people don't get it, but I cannot overemphasize how well it works. If you don't get Nat-Geo he has books and DVD's too but I've never looked at any of those. He has covered dozens of cases like Molly's where the dog had a tremendous fear of something and through very simple but very persistent methods the dog will be fine. It's all about the owner consistently acting properly and Molly will be a much happier dog once she is no longer afraid.

Some time ago, I started a thread about my beagle being afraid during thunder storms. He would shake, pant and get up in my face, which made it very difficult for me to sleep. I thought petting him and giving affection was the way to go because it would sooth him. I thought that's just the kind of dog he was and there was no fixing it. I even tried playing a CD of thunderstorm sounds to desensitize him. Wrong answers. It turns out it was my wife's fault (she hates when I say that). She also gets frightened during severe storms when I'm at work and the dog at some point picked up on her energy, so he too became frightened. She would then coddle him to calm him (and herself) down, then when I would get home I would do the same, which only further encouraged the behavior. After watching Dog Whisperer (I really don't like the title) I tried simply correcting my beagle when he began displaying the same behavior during the next storm. My wife also corrected him. Literally during the first storm his behavior changed. Once he learned that behavior was not acceptable, he stopped doing it. My wife may still become afraid during severe weather, but she doesn't go to the dog for comfort. The beagle, I am happy to say, has no problems with thunder storms anymore. He just snoozes right on through.

I also agree with you 100% on dog fighting, Bobby. It makes me sick to my stomach. I don't understand how people accept it as cultural.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-24-2009 10:10 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
6 months in jail was not enough punishment for that fat lady to go through after sicking her dog (oh look what a coincidence, a pit bull) on the officer. 2 years would've been more suitable, and regardless, the dog should've been put down. The officer was right in his comment, an attack with OR WITHOUT injury should be grounds to remove the dog from this world.

There are hundreds of GOOD dogs that get put down every day in shelters. There is no need to keep a dog that poses a potential risk to someone's well being. Had that dog tried to attack me or I witnessed it attacking someone else, it WOULD be dead.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 10-24-2009 11:27 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Chad Souder
My point was that an unsupervised 5 year old allowed to wander around outside could get hurt or killed any number of ways. It's awful that he was attacked by a poorly trained dog, but had it been a rabid skunk or raccoon or whatever may be wild on the streets of Utah, people would be asking the parents where they were. Like with Bobby's original story, the only one I know wasn't at fault here is the dog. The dog's owner and the parents of the child need to come under heavy interrogation.
I think it's dubious to say that the parents need to come under "heavy interrogation." What you see as neglectful, many see as a parent setting their 5-year old out in their front lawn then grabbing a glass of milk for a second... and in that second a problem occurred.

And you didn't say "kids can get hurt other ways." You instead used a strawman argument of suggesting that people who don't want pit bulls to be in their neighborhood must want all breeds to not be around.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-25-2009 12:12 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Chad,

You mis-understood that I absolutely agree. The prevelence of single barrel parents is all the more prevelent here in You-Taw. Hey, this has got to be the only state where at least one little kid a week(no joke but sad!)gets backed over in his driveway by his own parent! There are way too many parents around here that shouldn't have ever been parents. However, with the religeon thats at large in this part of the country there seems to be no end to the lineup of stupid parents.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-25-2009 12:40 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The non-stop coverage of the "balloon boy" thing is currently driving me insane.

 |  IP: Logged

James Westbrook
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1133
From: Lubbock, Texas, Usa
Registered: Mar 2006


 - posted 10-25-2009 01:32 PM      Profile for James Westbrook   Email James Westbrook   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It's STILL on the news? What is left for the media to report on this case? "The parents admitted this is a publicity stunt and the authorities are going to press charges." Sounds like DONE in regards to news to me.
The pilots that lost radio contact with the control tower and overshot their destination with passengers aboard sounds interesting...

 |  IP: Logged

Chad Souder
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 962
From: Waterloo, IA, USA
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 10-26-2009 11:20 AM      Profile for Chad Souder   Email Chad Souder   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
Chad,

You mis-understood that I absolutely agree.

Sorry, Mark, I should have been more clear myself! I was giving the thumbs up to Mark M. for humorously pointing out some embarrassing monotony, then further responding to the article. I should have used a last initial earlier. I think we're both in agreement here on the protective duty of parents and the apparent lack of such parents in your news article. That being said, I still hold the dog's owner responsible. Even if someone did let the dog out as a joke, he should have had a lockable kennel or some other method of preventing tampering.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-26-2009 06:32 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
An update on the latest dog mauling....

Article

"Dog that mauled WVC boy may be destroyed"

Animal control officers have cited the owner of the dog who bit a West Valley City boy on Friday and may seek to destroy the pit bull.

Kelly Davis, director of West Valley City Animal Services, said in an e-mail Monday his agency issued one citation covering allegations of having a dog running at large and attacking, having no license and having no proof of rabies vaccination. Davis' staff is keeping the pit bull in quarantine for at least 10 days, he said.

Davis said Friday was the first time his agents encountered the dog and owner but the events might encourage him to ask a judge for permission to destroy the dog.

Davis did not have an update on the condition of the 5-year-old boy on Monday. West Valley City police on Friday said the pit bull was loose on the street when it encountered and bit the boy on his face and head. A helicopter flew the child to Primary Children's Medical Center.

quote: Mike Blakesley
The non-stop coverage of the "balloon boy" thing is currently driving me insane.

I concur Captain!

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 10-26-2009 06:54 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I haven't been watching any of the 24-hour cable news channels for the past few months. They're on the shit list of things that make me go insane. Piss yellow journalism. If it's a 24-hour news network, it's utter crap. Coverage of balloon boy proves that.

I haven't even been watching The Daily Show and Colbert Report on Comedy Central nearly as much either. That's because their insults of the 24-hour cable news networks are pretty funny, but at the same time pretty depressing as well. On top of that The Daily Show and Colbert Report are still being produced in crappy standard definition while much of Comedy Central's other programming is HD. I just end up watching Letterman, Conan O'Brien or something entirely different instead.

 |  IP: Logged

Alex Edwards
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 114
From: Iowa
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 10-26-2009 09:23 PM      Profile for Alex Edwards   Email Alex Edwards       Edit/Delete Post 
Bobby, you're saying that you prefer Letterman to Stewart or Colbert just because he's in HD? I could understand prefering to watch a sporting event or Discovery in HD to get the shows full detail but a talk show? Don't you watch them for the content and not just because they look better?

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 10-26-2009 09:43 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Letterman, Colbert and Stewart are pretty interchangeable.

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-26-2009 10:16 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
T.V. pretty much turns me off, in general, these days.

There are about a half dozen shows that I even care to watch. Even then, I don't worry about watching them on a regular basis. If I miss them the first time all I have to do is wait two weeks. I'll see them in reruns.

I don't have cable T.V. or satellite. I don't watch it enough to make it worth it. I've got an antenna on the roof. Because I am virtually line-of-site to all four major T.V. transmitters in this area, I get everything I could ever want to watch off-air.

For the rest of my entertainment needs, the internet is more than sufficient.

If it wasn't for 9/11 I wouldn't even own a T.V. The only reason I got one was in case of disaster, I might need to watch the news to find out what's happening.

(That assumes that T.V. news is any good in the first place... See "Balloon Boy" above. )

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 45 pages: 1  2  3  ...  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  ...  43  44  45 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.